How a score became a payment: the measures
MIPS measure 370 pays on a PHQ-9 below 5 at twelve months. Measure 134 pays on a screen plus a documented follow-up plan within two days. Health plans report the same PHQ-9 measures to NCQA. The score is now a unit of account.
We have not finished checking this source. No judgement either way. how we score evidence
Caveat on this rating: Measure 134 is a process measure and its follow-up plan definition is broad by design; a documented referral counts, and the specification itself warns against reflexive prescribing. Measure 370 is an outcome measure and remission is a legitimate goal. The critique in this trail is about incentives around a screening score, not about the measures' stated intent, which is quoted.
Significant findings
Two federal quality measures turn the questionnaire into money.
Quality ID 134, "Screening for Depression and Follow-Up Plan", is a process measure: the "Percentage of patients aged 12 years and older screened for depression on the date of the encounter or up to 14 days prior to the date of the encounter using an age-appropriate standardized depression screening tool AND if positive, a follow-up plan is documented on the date of or up to two days after the date of the qualifying encounter." The specification names the PHQ-9, the PHQ-2 and others as acceptable tools, and defines the plan: "Documented follow-up for a positive depression screening must include one or more of the following: Referral to a provider for additional evaluation and assessment...; Pharmacological interventions; Other interventions or follow-up for the diagnosis or treatment of depression." It carries its own caution: a clinician should "Only order pharmacological intervention when appropriate and after sufficient diagnostic evaluation."
Quality ID 370, "Depression Remission at Twelve Months" (CBE 0710), is an outcome measure, marked "High Priority": "The percentage of adolescent patients 12 to 17 years of age and adult patients 18 years of age or older with major depression or dysthymia who reached remission 12 months (+/- 60 days) after an index event date." The index event is a diagnosis plus "an initial Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 item version (PHQ-9)... greater than nine". Remission is "a PHQ-9 or PHQ-9M score of less than five." The specification is copyrighted "MN Community Measurement, 2024", the Minnesota non-profit that developed it. Its own clinical text calls the PHQ-9 "an effective monitoring and management tool" and notes that "A five-point drop in PHQ-9 score is considered the minimal clinically significant difference."
Health plans answer to a parallel set from NCQA's HEDIS: screening and follow-up; "Utilization of the PHQ-9 to Monitor Depression Symptoms", the share of members with a depression diagnosis "who had an outpatient encounter with a PHQ-9 score present in their record"; and remission or response within 4 to 8 months, remission again below 5. Medicare's own coverage rule dates to 2011: annual screening "up to 15 minutes", once per 12 months, with staff-assisted supports.
Worth asking
None of these measures is dishonest, and the outcome one asks for something worth wanting: fewer symptoms a year on. But notice which behaviours are rewarded. A screen with a plan documented inside 48 hours; a PHQ-9 present in the record; a score under five. The form has become the unit of account. What happens to your care when the number is the thing being counted?
Source
Quality ID #370 (CBE 0710): Depression Remission at Twelve Months. 2025 MIPS Clinical Quality Measure specification, version 9.0 — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Quality Payment Program (measure copyright MN Community Measurement) (2024)
How this was scored
- Study design
- not recorded
- Funding
- not recorded
- Published in
- not recorded
- Sample size
- not recorded
- Preregistered
- not recorded
- Conflicts disclosed
- not recorded
- Independent of proponent
- not recorded
- Retracted
- No
We have not finished checking this source, so there is no scoring to show yet. “We have not checked this yet” and “this is disputed” are different statements, so no scored band is shown rather than a low one.
Read the full scoring rubric, including what it can't tell you.
Published September 15, 2026.
Questions
How strong is the evidence behind this?
veisund rates this source "not yet assessed". We have not finished checking this source. No judgement either way. One caveat travels with that badge: Measure 134 is a process measure and its follow-up plan definition is broad by design; a documented referral counts, and the specification itself warns against reflexive prescribing. Measure 370 is an outcome measure and remission is a legitimate goal. The critique in this trail is about incentives around a screening score, not about the measures' stated intent, which is quoted. The score is calculated from recorded facts about the source — study design, funding, publication venue, sample size, preregistration — not typed in by an editor.
What is the source for this?
Quality ID #370 (CBE 0710): Depression Remission at Twelve Months. 2025 MIPS Clinical Quality Measure specification, version 9.0 — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Quality Payment Program (measure copyright MN Community Measurement) (2024). The full source is linked on this page so you can read it yourself.
Is this medical advice?
This is information to bring to your prescriber, not medical advice and not a reason to change anything on your own. Nothing here is an instruction to stop or reduce a medication. If you are in crisis, call or text 988.
This is information to bring to your prescriber, not medical advice and not a reason to change anything on your own. Nothing here is an instruction to stop or reduce a medication. If you are in crisis, call or text 988.