we sell a therapist listing, so read these with that in mind — and then notice we still tell you when a competitor is the better fit. every page covers real pricing (verified 2026), what the fee actually buys, and who each platform genuinely suits. veisund is new; where our audience is smaller or a feature doesn't exist, the page says so.
for therapists whose $29.95/mo listing stopped producing. reputation-building vs. static listing.
7 real options compared: Headway, Alma, Zencare, GoodTherapy, TherapyDen, Mental Health Match, and veisund.
when $59–69/mo plus setup buys a beautiful profile nobody walks past. the boutique-directory math, honestly.
the CE bundle vs. the directory itself — verified 2026 tiers, and what to do if the referrals never came.
real billing replacements — Headway, SonderMind, Grow Therapy, direct credentialing — and where veisund actually fits.
the unpublished cut, the billing complaints, and the honest replacements. veisund is the reach layer, not the billing swap.
Yes, as a listing channel, not a search directory. veisund is a free peer-support app (formerly Resolv Social, renamed September 2026) where therapists can hold a listing that members see when they decide they want professional help. Listings are free, and veisund never takes a percentage of session fees. Psychology Today is $29.95 a month for a profile in a search directory with far more traffic.
A directory shows your profile to people searching for a therapist. veisund shows your listing to people already talking through a mental-health struggle with peers in a community, at the moment they decide peer support is not enough. The audience is smaller and newer than a directory; the fit is a flat-fee listing you can add without betting anything on it.
No insurance billing, no credentialing, no EHR, and no client-matching service. Alma and Headway handle billing and credentialing; veisund is a listing plus a community. It is peer support, not therapy, and says so in the app.
Every research summary veisund publishes carries a trust score computed from the source itself — study design, funding, venue, sample size, preregistration — and a retracted paper scores zero and is blocked from publication. It's all free to read on the web with no account, so you can check the standard before you attach your licence to it.
read the evidence library · how the scoring works, including what it can't tell you
two fields, about a minute. the app is live and public in both stores — go look first if you'd rather: app store · google play