Medication approval journey

gabapentin (Neurontin)

Approved for Postherpetic neuralgia, and adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures

page first published · last updated

Also answers to “the everything bagel” — its codename in our videos and posts. The full codebook

FDA approvedGabapentinoidTaper risk: high

How this page reads

The page as written, with the clinical terms

Plain language uses the same facts, the same numbers and the same caveats. It does not leave anything out. Quotes from the FDA label are never reworded in either setting.

Before you stop or change your gabapentin dose

Stopping abruptly can be dangerous — never do it without medical supervision

Do not stop abruptly. Abrupt discontinuation of gabapentin or pregabalin can trigger seizures, including in people who have never had one. Any change should be a prescriber-supervised taper.

what the gabapentin warnings mean

label facts below are read from the gabapentin capsules FDA label on DailyMed, set id 4615aaa7-73d4-4473-8f26-e7a982f8a166, version 1, effective august 27, 2026 (published august 31, 2026), the version the dossier above cites. the section numbers in brackets are the label’s own. every source is linked at the end of this section. last checked 2026-10-05.

gabapentin was approved on december 30, 1993 as an add-on treatment for partial seizures, later for the nerve pain that follows shingles, and the label lists no psychiatric indication [label 1; approval]. about 11.5 million americans filled a prescription for it in 2024, up from about 7.6 million in 2014 [meps], and most of that use is for something not on the label: pain of other kinds, anxiety, sleep. it is not a federally controlled substance [label 9.1] and its label carries no boxed warning [label; fda-2019]. what it does carry is ten numbered warnings, including the respiratory-depression warning the fda added in december 2019 for use with opioids and other sedatives, the suicidality warning that every antiepileptic drug carries, a hypersensitivity syndrome that has been fatal, and a candid section on misuse, dependence and withdrawal. this section says what each means in plain words, what the approval trials measured and for how long, which side effects the label counts and how often, and what the trials of its unapproved uses found, in both directions. every number is from the label, an fda communication, or a study linked at the end.

this is information to take to a prescriber. nothing here is a reason to start, stop or change a dose on your own; the label says that stopping abruptly can raise seizure frequency and that withdrawal symptoms have followed even short-term use, and the taper it asks for is quoted below.

no boxed warning, and what the 2019 breathing warning says

the gabapentin label has no boxed warning. that is worth being accurate about, because the december 2019 fda action is often described as a black box and it was not; the fda required new wording in the warnings and precautions section, and required manufacturers to run clinical trials on abuse potential, particularly in combination with opioids [fda-2019]. the fda’s communication, dated december 19, 2019 and still live on fda.gov, says serious breathing difficulties may occur in people using gabapentin or pregabalin who have respiratory risk factors: opioids or other central nervous system depressants taken at the same time, conditions that reduce lung function such as copd, and older age [fda-2019]. it lists the symptoms to watch for: confusion, unusual dizziness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or shallow breathing, unresponsiveness, and bluish skin [fda-2019].

the label’s wording, section 5.8: "there is evidence from case reports, human studies, and animal studies associating gabapentin with serious, life-threatening, or fatal respiratory depression when coadministered with cns depressants, including opioids, or in the setting of underlying respiratory impairment." when the two are prescribed together, or gabapentin is prescribed to someone with impaired breathing, it says to monitor for slowed breathing and sedation and to consider starting at a low dose [label 5.8]. the interactions section adds that respiratory depression and sedation, "sometimes resulting in death", have been reported with morphine, hydrocodone, oxycodone and buprenorphine; morphine raises gabapentin blood levels, and gabapentin lowers hydrocodone exposure [label 7.1]. the overdose section records fatal respiratory depression with gabapentin alone and in combination with other cns depressants [label 10].

the size of the opioid risk comes from one study. among opioid users in ontario, 1,256 who died of an opioid-related cause were matched with 4,619 opioid-using controls; 12.3% of the deaths and 6.8% of the controls had been prescribed gabapentin in the prior 120 days, an adjusted odds ratio of 1.49 (95% ci 1.18 to 1.88). at moderate and high gabapentin doses (900 mg a day and above) the odds were about 60% higher. the same design found no association for a non-sedating painkiller, nsaids, which is what you would expect if the gabapentin finding is about sedation rather than about the kind of patient who takes a second drug [gomes-2017]. it is a case-control study in administrative data: association, not proof of cause, and ontario only [gomes-2017].

the suicidality warning that every antiepileptic carries

section 5.5 says antiepileptic drugs, "including gabapentin, increase the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior in patients taking these drugs for any indication". the evidence is a pooled analysis of 199 placebo-controlled trials of 11 antiepileptic drugs: people randomised to a drug had about twice the risk of suicidal thinking or behaviour (adjusted relative risk 1.8, 95% ci 1.2 to 2.7). in absolute terms, 0.43% of 27,863 people on a drug against 0.24% of 16,029 on placebo, about one additional case for every 530 people treated over a median of 12 weeks. there were four suicides on drug and none on placebo, a number the label says is too small to allow any conclusion. the risk appeared as early as one week in and persisted through the trials, which mostly ended by 24 weeks [label 5.5].

the label breaks it down by why people were taking the drug, per 1,000 patients: epilepsy 3.4 on drug against 1.0 on placebo; psychiatric conditions 8.5 against 5.7; other conditions 1.8 against 1.0; in total 4.3 against 2.4, a difference of about two extra people per thousand [label 5.5, table 2]. two things to read carefully. this is a class-wide analysis, not a gabapentin-specific one; the label says the risk "was generally consistent among drugs" and applies it to all of them. and the label pairs it with the illness: anyone prescribing must weigh the risk "with the risk of untreated illness", since epilepsy and the psychiatric conditions these drugs are used for raise the risk of suicidal thoughts themselves [label 5.5]. suicidal behaviour and ideation have also been reported after gabapentin is stopped [label 5.5, 5.6].

dress, anaphylaxis and the other warnings, in plain words

the warnings section runs from 5.1 to 5.10. the april 2025 revision rewrote 5.5 and 5.6 and removed a former 5.10 on sudden unexplained death in epilepsy [label, recent major changes]. the rest:

  • dress, or multiorgan hypersensitivity [5.1]: fever, rash or swollen lymph nodes together with organ involvement such as hepatitis, nephritis, blood abnormalities, myocarditis or myositis, "sometimes resembling an acute viral infection". the label says some of these reactions have been fatal or life-threatening, that early signs can appear before any rash, and that the drug should be stopped if no other cause is found.
  • anaphylaxis and angioedema [5.2]: difficulty breathing and swelling of the lips, throat and tongue, "after the first dose or at any time during treatment"; stop the drug and seek immediate care.
  • driving [5.3]: driving studies with a prodrug of gabapentin showed significant impairment; the label says people cannot reliably judge their own competence or how sleepy they are, and that how long the impairment lasts after starting is unknown.
  • sleepiness, dizziness and unsteadiness [5.4]: in the epilepsy trials at up to 1,800 mg, somnolence 19% against 9% on placebo, dizziness 17% against 7%, ataxia 13% against 6%; in the shingles-pain trials at up to 3,600 mg, somnolence 21% against 5% and dizziness 28% against 8%. the label says to watch for cns depression when other sedating drugs are on board "because of potential synergy".
  • stopping [5.6]: antiepileptic drugs "should not be abruptly discontinued"; when gabapentin is stopped, "the dose should be tapered over at least a one-week period". withdrawal symptoms have followed both short-term and long-term use, usually within 48 hours, and have included seizures, depression, suicidal ideation, agitation, confusion, psychotic symptoms, anxiety, insomnia, nausea, pain, sweating and tremor [5.6, 9.3].
  • status epilepticus [5.7]: 0.6% on gabapentin against 0.5% on placebo in the controlled epilepsy trials; the label cannot say whether the drug changes the rate.
  • children aged 3 to 12 [5.9]: emotional lability 6% against 1.3%, hostility 5.2% against 1.3%, hyperkinesia 4.7% against 2.9%, thought disorder 1.7% against 0.
  • tumours [5.10]: gabapentin increased pancreatic tumours in rats; the label says the clinical significance is unknown and that the premarketing trials cannot tell whether the tumours seen in people were affected by treatment.
  • kidneys and age [2.3, 8.5]: gabapentin is cleared almost entirely by the kidneys, so the dose is adjusted to kidney function, and older people, in whom kidney function falls, got a larger effect from the same dose in the pain trials; peripheral oedema and ataxia rose with age.
  • antacids [7.3]: an aluminium and magnesium hydroxide antacid cut gabapentin absorption by about 20%; the label says to take gabapentin at least two hours after it.
  • after marketing [6.2]: jaundice and raised liver tests, low sodium, rhabdomyolysis, movement disorders, breast enlargement, sexual side effects, and the skin reactions stevens-johnson syndrome and erythema multiforme have been reported, at rates the label cannot estimate.

misuse, dependence and withdrawal: what the label and the reviews say

gabapentin "is not a controlled substance" under federal law [label 9.1]. the label says misuse and abuse "have been reported in the postmarketing setting and published literature", that most of the people described had a history of polysubstance abuse, that some were taking more than the recommended dose for unapproved uses, and that "the abuse potential of gabapentin has not been evaluated in human studies" [label 9.2]. it asks prescribers to check for a history of drug abuse and to watch for self-escalation of the dose and drug-seeking [label 9.2]. the dependence section says the same of dependence potential: not evaluated in human studies, but withdrawal symptoms observed after short- and long-term treatment, usually within 48 hours of stopping [label 9.3].

the published literature the label refers to has been reviewed three times by the same group. the 2021 update found 55 new studies in four years and concluded that gabapentinoids "are increasingly abused or misused to self-medicate", that they "can produce desirable effects alone but are often used concomitantly with other drugs", that opioid use disorder "is the greatest risk factor" for their abuse, and, "the most concerning finding", growing evidence of patient harm including hospital use and opioid-overdose mortality [evoy-2021]. the 2026 update, 100 further studies to january 2025, found "more compelling evidence that gabapentinoids increase overdose risk, particularly when used with opioids or benzodiazepines", with misuse newly documented in adolescents and in people with chronic pain [evoy-2026]. the uk guideline on medicines associated with dependence lists gabapentinoids alongside opioids, benzodiazepines, z-drugs and antidepressants, says withdrawal "may take several months or more", and asks for a written taper; gabapentinoids are the one class it reduces by a fixed amount at each step rather than proportionally [nice-2022].

what the approval trials measured, and for how long

the shingles-pain indication rests on two randomised placebo-controlled trials in 563 people with pain lasting more than three months after the rash healed: one 8-week trial at 3,600 mg a day (113 on gabapentin, 116 on placebo) and one 7-week trial at 1,800 and 2,400 mg (223 against 111). pain was scored daily on a 0 to 10 scale; both trials beat placebo at every dose, with the difference visible by week one, and the label says the extra benefit of going above 1,800 mg "was not demonstrated" [label 14.1, 2.1].

the seizure indication rests on three add-on trials in 705 people aged 12 and over and one in 247 children aged 3 to 12, each with a 12-week treatment period after a 12-week baseline, in people still having at least two to four seizures a month on their existing drugs. the outcome was the share of people whose seizures fell by half: 23% against 9% at 1,200 mg in the first trial; 16% against 8% at 1,200 mg in the second, which was not statistically significant, with 26% at 1,800 mg, which was; 22% against 10% at 900 mg in the third. in the children, the response ratio was significant but the responder rate (21% against 18%) was not, and a trial in infants aged one month to three years found no difference [label 14.2]. nothing on the label is placebo-controlled beyond 12 weeks, and nothing on it tested a psychiatric condition.

side effects, with the label’s numbers

in the shingles-pain trials (336 on gabapentin at up to 3,600 mg against 227 on placebo): dizziness 28% against 8%, somnolence 21% against 5%, peripheral oedema 8% against 2%, weakness 6% against 5%, diarrhea 6% against 3%, dry mouth 5% against 1%, constipation 4% against 2%, ataxia 3% against 0, abnormal thinking 3% against 0, blurred vision 3% against 1%, weight gain 2% against 0. 16% of people on gabapentin and 9% on placebo stopped because of a side effect, most often dizziness, somnolence and nausea [label 6.1, table 3].

in the add-on epilepsy trials in people over 12 (543 against 378): somnolence 19% against 9%, dizziness 17% against 7%, ataxia 13% against 6%, fatigue 11% against 5%, nystagmus 8% against 4%, tremor 7% against 3%, double vision 6% against 2%, blurred vision 4% against 1%, weight gain 3% against 2%, amnesia 2% against 0, depression 2% against 1%, impotence 2% against 1%. somnolence and ataxia rose with dose. about 7% of people in the premarketing trials stopped for a side effect [label 6.1, table 4]. in children aged 3 to 12 (119 against 128): viral infection 11% against 3%, fever 10% against 3%, nausea or vomiting 8% against 7%, somnolence 8% against 5%, hostility 8% against 2% [label 6.1, table 5].

anxiety and sleep: not an approved use, and what the trials say

gabapentin for anxiety, insomnia or mood is not an approved use. the fda has never reviewed evidence for it, the label contains no trial of it, and the suicidality warning above applies to the drug "for any indication" [label 1, 5.5]. the evidence that exists is published trials, and it points both ways.

in favour. the largest synthesis, a 2022 systematic review of 55 double-blind randomised trials and 15 open-label studies of gabapentin and pregabalin in bipolar disorder, anxiety and insomnia, found "a consistent but not universal effect in favour of gabapentinoids compared to placebo" across the anxiety spectrum (standardised mean differences from −2.25 to −0.25), with the clearest signal in anxiety before surgery (gabapentin −0.92, 95% ci −1.32 to −0.52), and concluded there is "moderate evidence of the efficacy of gabapentinoids in anxiety states" [hong-2022]. the best-known single trial randomised 69 people with social phobia to gabapentin at 900 to 3,600 mg a day or placebo for 14 weeks and found a significant reduction in symptoms on clinician and patient scales, with more dizziness, dry mouth, somnolence, nausea and decreased libido on the drug [pande-1999]. a 2015 systematic review found that of 34 trials of adequate quality, those in some anxiety disorders and in alcohol craving and withdrawal showed benefit [berlin-2015].

against, or smaller than it sounds. the same 2022 review found "minimal evidence in bipolar disorder and insomnia" (four double-blind trials in bipolar disorder, none poolable; insomnia "inconclusive") and said the drugs "should be used for these disorders only with strong justification" [hong-2022]. the panic-disorder trial from the same programme, 103 people over 8 weeks, found no difference from placebo on the primary scale (p = 0.606); the reported benefit in the more severely ill is a post hoc analysis [pande-2000]. the 2015 review noted "there are no studies for generalized anxiety disorder", the condition it is most often prescribed for, and no clear evidence in depression, ptsd prevention or ocd [berlin-2015]; a 2019 review of 54 papers reached the same shape, benefit in preoperative anxiety and social phobia, little as a sole treatment, and warned that many of the positive studies were open-label [ahmed-2019]. a 2019 clinical overview of off-label gabapentinoid prescribing concluded that "review articles and guidelines tend to overstate gabapentinoid effectiveness" and that prescribers "should acknowledge to patients that potential benefits are uncertain for most off-label uses" [goodman-2019].

who paid. the 2022 review was funded by the uk department of health; two of its authors hold an unrestricted educational grant from johnson & johnson on unrelated work, and one has received fees from angelini pharma [hong-2022]. the 1999 and 2000 trials predate routine funding statements and the abstracts read for this page carry none, so their funding is recorded as unknown rather than inferred [pande-1999; pande-2000]. the 2015 review was supported by a national institute on aging grant [berlin-2015].

what the research says, in both directions

in favour. the approval trials show a real effect on refractory partial seizures and on post-shingles pain, visible in the first week [label 14.1, 14.2]. in anxiety, the pooled randomised evidence is moderate and mostly positive, strongest before surgery and in social phobia [hong-2022; pande-1999]. the respiratory warning is specific: the label and the fda tie it to co-prescribed depressants and to existing lung disease, not to healthy people taking gabapentin alone [label 5.8; fda-2019].

against. the drug has no approved psychiatric use and its longest controlled evidence is 12 weeks [label 14]. the panic trial was negative, generalised anxiety has no trial, insomnia is inconclusive, and the people who reviewed the off-label literature most carefully say its effectiveness is overstated [pande-2000; berlin-2015; hong-2022; goodman-2019]. the misuse literature has grown from 59 studies to more than 200 in nine years, and the harm it documents concentrates where gabapentin is stacked on opioids or benzodiazepines [evoy-2021; evoy-2026].

the warnings, measured. the breathing warning’s size is the ontario study: about one and a half times the odds of an opioid-related death with a gabapentin prescription in the prior four months, rising with dose [gomes-2017]. the suicidality warning’s size is the label’s own pooled analysis: about two extra people per thousand with suicidal thoughts or behaviour, over about 12 weeks, across the whole drug class [label 5.5]. the dependence warning’s timescale is in the uk guideline [nice-2022]. gabapentin has a legal and safety record page on this site, which keeps the court and regulatory record separately from the label facts here [legal].

questions to ask your prescriber about gabapentin

each one comes from a warning or a study above. they are questions, not instructions; the answers depend on a history nobody here has.

  • what is this prescribed for, and is that use on the label? if it is for anxiety or sleep, what is the evidence you are going on, and what would we expect to see by when?
  • is any opioid, benzodiazepine, sleeping pill, muscle relaxant or alcohol in the picture? the label says the breathing risk is in the combination, and the fda says the dose should start low when it is.
  • do i have copd, sleep apnoea or any other reason my breathing is already impaired, and does my age change the dose?
  • what is my kidney function, and is the dose adjusted to it? the label says the drug is cleared almost entirely by the kidneys.
  • the label says antiepileptic drugs raise the risk of suicidal thoughts in about two extra people per thousand. what should i and the people around me watch for, and who do i call?
  • if we ever stop, the label says to taper over at least a week and that withdrawal can start within 48 hours. what would my schedule be, and what would withdrawal look like against my original symptoms coming back?
  • fever, rash or swollen glands early on can be the first sign of the hypersensitivity syndrome. what should make me stop and call the same day?

questions people ask

does gabapentin (neurontin) have a black box warning?
no. the gabapentin label has no boxed warning. in december 2019 the fda added a warning to the warnings and precautions section, not a box, saying that serious and potentially fatal breathing problems can occur in people taking gabapentin or pregabalin who have risk factors: opioids or other central nervous system depressants taken at the same time, lung conditions such as copd, and older age. the fda also required manufacturers to run trials on abuse potential, particularly with opioids. the label carries nine other numbered warnings, including the class-wide suicidality warning for antiepileptic drugs and a multiorgan hypersensitivity reaction (dress) that has been fatal.
can you take gabapentin with opioids?
the label does not forbid it, but it says that evidence from case reports, human and animal studies links gabapentin with serious, life-threatening or fatal respiratory depression when taken with cns depressants including opioids, and that respiratory depression and sedation, sometimes resulting in death, have been reported with morphine, hydrocodone, oxycodone and buprenorphine. when the two are prescribed together it asks for monitoring for slowed breathing and sedation and a low starting dose. in a study of opioid users in ontario, those who died of an opioid-related cause were about one and a half times as likely to have had a gabapentin prescription in the prior four months, rising with dose. the combination is a question for whoever prescribes either drug, and both need to know about the other.
is gabapentin a controlled substance, and is it addictive?
gabapentin is not a federally controlled substance; the label says so in section 9.1. the same label says misuse and abuse have been reported after marketing and in the published literature, mostly in people with a history of using several substances, sometimes at doses above the recommended ones for unapproved uses, and that its abuse potential "has not been evaluated in human studies". physical dependence is a separate thing: the label says withdrawal symptoms have followed short-term and long-term use, usually within 48 hours of stopping. systematic reviews of the misuse literature, now more than 200 studies, find that opioid use disorder is the biggest risk factor for gabapentinoid misuse and that overdose risk rises when they are combined with opioids or benzodiazepines.
does gabapentin work for anxiety?
anxiety is not an approved use; the fda has never reviewed it and the label contains no trial of it. the published trials point both ways. a 2022 systematic review of 55 double-blind trials found moderate evidence that gabapentinoids reduce anxiety against placebo, clearest for anxiety before surgery and in social phobia, where a 69-person 14-week trial was positive. the panic-disorder trial, 103 people over 8 weeks, found no difference from placebo. there are no trials in generalised anxiety disorder, insomnia evidence is inconclusive, and the reviewers say gabapentinoids should be used for these conditions "only with strong justification". whatever the reason for a prescription, the label’s suicidality warning applies to any indication.
what happens if you stop gabapentin suddenly?
the label says antiepileptic drugs should not be stopped abruptly because seizures can become more frequent, and that gabapentin should be tapered over at least one week. withdrawal symptoms have been observed after both short and long courses, usually within 48 hours, and have included seizures, depression, suicidal ideation and behaviour, agitation, confusion, disorientation, psychotic symptoms, anxiety, insomnia, nausea, pain, sweating, tremor, headache and dizziness. the uk guideline on dependence-forming medicines lists gabapentinoids with opioids and benzodiazepines and says withdrawal may take several months or more. a taper plan belongs with a prescriber.
what are the most common gabapentin side effects?
in the label’s post-shingles pain trials at up to 3,600 mg a day: dizziness 28% vs 8% on placebo, sleepiness 21% vs 5%, swollen ankles 8% vs 2%, diarrhea 6% vs 3%, dry mouth 5% vs 1%. in the add-on epilepsy trials: sleepiness 19% vs 9%, dizziness 17% vs 7%, unsteadiness 13% vs 6%, fatigue 11% vs 5%, tremor 7% vs 3%, double vision 6% vs 2%. sleepiness and unsteadiness rose with dose, and the label says not to drive until you know how it affects you, since driving studies showed significant impairment and people misjudge their own sleepiness. in children aged 3 to 12 the label adds hostility (8% vs 2%) and emotional lability.

sources for this section

the library rows link to our one-page summary of each study, with the original paper, its funding and our evidence grade on that page.

  1. gabapentin capsules prescribing information, fda label on dailymed (set id 4615aaa7-73d4-4473-8f26-e7a982f8a166, version 1, effective august 27, 2026): sections 1, 2.1 to 2.3, 5.1 to 5.10, 6.1 tables 3 to 5, 6.2, 7.1, 7.3, 8.5, 9.1 to 9.3, 10, 14.1, 14.2, recent major changes
  2. drugs@fda, nda 020235 (neurontin), approved december 30, 1993; the approval record the dossier above cites
  3. ahrq medical expenditure panel survey, prescribed medicines public-use files 2014 (hc-168a) and 2024 (hc-254a): people with at least one gabapentin purchase, weighted; computed by veisund, method on the usage section of this page
  4. fda drug safety communication, december 19, 2019: fda warns about serious breathing problems with seizure and nerve pain medicines gabapentin (neurontin, gralise, horizant) and pregabalin (lyrica, lyrica cr); page re-read live on fda.gov on the verification date (library row)
  5. the neurontin (brand) label’s sections 5.6 and 5.8 quoted, dailymed set id 97935fd9-1d4a-43b6-a5d9-de994591187b, spl version 48, august 2026; the same wording as the generic label read for this section (library row)
  6. gomes t, juurlink dn, antoniou t, mamdani mm, paterson jm, van den brink w. gabapentin, opioids, and the risk of opioid-related death: a population-based nested case-control study. plos medicine 2017 (library row)
  7. national institute for health and care excellence. medicines associated with dependence or withdrawal symptoms: safe prescribing and withdrawal management for adults (ng215), 2022 (library row)
  8. hong jsw, atkinson lz, al-juffali n, awad a, geddes jr, tunbridge em, et al. gabapentin and pregabalin in bipolar disorder, anxiety states, and insomnia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and rationale. molecular psychiatry 2022;27:1339-1349 (pubmed 34819636; abstract and declarations read on the verification date; not yet a library row)
  9. pande ac, davidson jr, jefferson jw, janney ca, katzelnick dj, weisler rh, et al. treatment of social phobia with gabapentin: a placebo-controlled study. journal of clinical psychopharmacology 1999;19:341-348 (pubmed 10440462; abstract read; funding statement not in the record)
  10. pande ac, pollack mh, crockatt j, greiner m, chouinard g, lydiard rb, et al. placebo-controlled study of gabapentin treatment of panic disorder. journal of clinical psychopharmacology 2000;20:467-471 (pubmed 10917408; abstract read; funding statement not in the record)
  11. berlin rk, butler pm, perloff md. gabapentin therapy in psychiatric disorders: a systematic review. primary care companion for cns disorders 2015;17(5) (pubmed 26835178; abstract read; national institute on aging grant on the record)
  12. ahmed s, bachu r, kotapati p, adnan m, ahmed r, farooq u, et al. use of gabapentin in the treatment of substance use and psychiatric disorders: a systematic review. frontiers in psychiatry 2019;10:228 (pubmed 31133886; abstract read)
  13. goodman cw, brett as. a clinical overview of off-label use of gabapentinoid drugs. jama internal medicine 2019;179:695-701 (pubmed 30907944; abstract read)
  14. evoy ke, sadrameli s, contreras j, covvey jr, peckham am, morrison mn. abuse and misuse of pregabalin and gabapentin: a systematic review update. drugs 2021;81:125-156 (pubmed 33215352; abstract read)
  15. evoy ke, drain d, pedigo j, covvey jr, ramey o. misuse of pregabalin and gabapentin: a second systematic review update. drugs 2026;86:1365-1378 (pubmed 42236659; abstract and declarations read; authors declare no relevant conflicts)

How long the gabapentin trials actually ran

We could not establish a longest trial length for gabapentin. That is a gap in what we can show you — not evidence that the trials ran long.

The label carries a clinical studies section describing the trials the approval rested on.

The gap between how long the trials ran and how long people actually take these medications is the single most important thing on this page. It is not evidence that longer use is unsafe or ineffective. It is evidence that longer use was not what got tested.

People often stay on these drugs for far longer than the trials ran. The trials behind the seizure approval ran 12 weeks.

That does not mean longer use is unsafe. It does not mean the drug stops working either. It means longer use was never the thing that got tested.

If you have been on it a long time, that is a fair thing to ask your prescriber about.

No boxed warning on the gabapentin label

The FDA label we quote for gabapentin carries no boxed warning. A boxed warning is the strongest warning the FDA can put on a label, and this label does not have one. That is a fact about the label. It is not a rating of how safe the drug is, and it does not mean the label warns about nothing: what it does warn about is in the sections below.

FDA label effective August 27, 2026. Read the full label on DailyMed

What gabapentin is FDA approved for, and the trials behind it

Approved for adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in adults and pediatric patients 3 years and older with epilepsy, and management of postherpetic neuralgia in adults; the label lists no psychiatric indication in 1993, under application NDA 020235. Source: FDA Drugs@FDA.

Effectiveness as add-on therapy for partial seizures was established in multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trials: three trials in 705 patients aged 12 and older and one in 247 pediatric patients aged 3 to 12, with gabapentin or placebo added to existing antiepileptic drugs for a 12-week treatment period. Responder rates (a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency) ranged from 16% to 26% on gabapentin versus 8% to 10% on placebo across the three adult trials. The postherpetic neuralgia indication rests on two placebo-controlled trials totaling 563 patients over 7 to 8 weeks.

The FDA approved gabapentin in 1993. There were two approved uses. One is added-on treatment for partial-onset seizures in adults and in children aged 3 and older with epilepsy. The other is nerve pain after shingles in adults. The label calls that postherpetic neuralgia. The label lists no mental health use. The file number is NDA 020235. The source is Drugs@FDA, the FDA's own database.

The seizure approval rests on trials run at several sites against a placebo. Nobody knew who got the drug. The groups ran side by side (double-blind, parallel-group).

Three trials held 705 patients aged 12 and older. One held 247 children aged 3 to 12. The drug or a placebo was added on top of the epilepsy drugs people already took, for 12 weeks.

Across the three adult trials, 16 to 26 out of every 100 people on the drug had their seizures cut by at least half. On the placebo it was 8 to 10 out of 100.

The nerve pain use rests on two trials against a placebo. They held 563 people in total, over 7 to 8 weeks.

Trials
3 adult and 1 pediatric placebo-controlled trials
Duration
12 weeks
Participants
705 patients aged 12 and older, plus 247 children
Compared against
Placebo, added to existing antiepileptic drugs
Evidence of effectiveness was obtained in three trials conducted in 705 patients (age 12 years and above) and one trial conducted in 247 pediatric patients (3 to 12 years of age).

Verbatim from the gabapentin FDA label, Clinical Studies section, effective August 27, 2026 — read the full label on DailyMed.

Side effects of gabapentin in the approval trials

Incidence among 543 patients on gabapentin versus 378 on placebo, pooled from the placebo-controlled add-on epilepsy trials in patients over 12; in these studies gabapentin or placebo was added to each patient's existing antiepileptic drug therapy. The label cautions that rates observed in clinical trials cannot be directly compared with other trials and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.

Read the limits first. These numbers are pooled from the add-on epilepsy trials against a placebo in patients over 12. 543 people took the drug and 378 took a placebo.

In those trials the drug or the placebo was added on top of the epilepsy drugs each person already took.

The label warns that you cannot line these rates up against other trials. It warns that real life may not match them either.

  • Somnolence (19% vs 9% on placebo)
  • Dizziness (17% vs 7%)
  • Ataxia (13% vs 6%)
  • Fatigue (11% vs 5%)
  • Nystagmus (8% vs 4%)
  • Tremor (7% vs 3%)
  • Diplopia (6% vs 2%)
  • Amblyopia, often described as blurred vision (4% vs 1%)
  • Increased weight (3% vs 2%)
  • Dysarthria (2% vs 1%)
The most common adverse reactions with gabapentin in combination with other antiepileptic drugs in patients >12 years of age, not seen at an equivalent frequency among placebo-treated patients, were somnolence, dizziness, ataxia, fatigue, and nystagmus.

From the gabapentin FDA label, Adverse Reactions section, effective August 27, 2026 — DailyMed.

More from the gabapentin label: drug abuse and dependence

  • Not federally scheduled, but misuse reported

    Gabapentin is not a controlled substance. The label nonetheless reports misuse and abuse in the postmarketing setting and published literature — mostly in people with a history of polysubstance abuse, some taking higher-than-recommended doses for unapproved uses — and advises evaluating patients for a history of drug abuse and watching for self-dose escalation and drug-seeking behavior.

    FDA label, Drug Abuse and Dependence section.

  • Withdrawal symptoms after stopping

    Withdrawal symptoms have been observed after discontinuation of both short-term and long-term treatment, usually within 48 hours; reported reactions include seizures, anxiety, insomnia, nausea, pain and sweating. The label notes the dependence potential has not been evaluated in human studies.

    FDA label, Drug Abuse and Dependence section.

  • Taper over at least a week

    As an antiepileptic drug, gabapentin should not be abruptly discontinued because of the possibility of increased seizure frequency; when it is being discontinued, the label says the dose should be tapered over at least one week.

    FDA label, Warnings and Precautions section.

How many Americans take gabapentin

Survey-based federal estimates, published with a lag of about two years. They count prescriptions filled, not outcomes.

These are federal survey numbers. They come out about two years late. They count prescriptions filled. They do not tell you if the drug helped.

46,937,114
prescriptions in the United States (2024), refills included
11,481,839
people filling them (2024), ± 1,108,682 (95%)

Prescriptions are up 19% from 2014 to 2024, a change larger than the survey’s margin of error. Whatever you decide about gabapentin, you are deciding alongside about 11,481,839 other people in 2024.

Prescriptions by year: 2014 39,361,473 · 2015 43,316,475 · 2016 44,154,514 · 2017 46,043,168 · 2018 45,586,654 · 2019 47,149,506 · 2020 49,961,067 · 2021 47,125,974 · 2022 40,141,487 · 2023 45,964,506 · 2024 46,937,114.

Prescriptions are up 19 percent since 2014. About 11.5 million people in the United States took it in 2024.

Correction (29 September 2026). An earlier version of this section took its numbers from ClinCalc DrugStats, a third-party site that republishes this survey; we now compute them from AHRQ’s public-use files ourselves. It showed 11,472,603 people and 46,839,967 prescriptions for 2024; the file gives 11,481,839 and 46,937,114.

Source: AHRQ Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Prescribed Medicines public-use files, 2014 (HC-168A) through 2024 (HC-254A), computed by veisund. People with at least one purchase where the Multum generic name (RXDRGNAM) equals the drug, weighted by the year’s person weight; purchases include refills. Standard errors by Taylor linearization on VARSTR/VARPSU. AHRQ’s reliability rule: a year is not shown when fewer than 60 survey respondents reported the drug or the relative standard error is over 50%. AHRQ cautions that its 2018 questionnaire redesign and the 2020–2022 pandemic years make year-to-year comparisons less certain.

What people report to the FDA about gabapentin

Read this before the numbers.

Anyone can file an adverse event report — patients, doctors, manufacturers — and nobody verifies that the drug caused what was reported. There is no denominator: tens of millions of prescriptions generate reports at an unknowable rate, and reporting rises with news coverage, not necessarily with harm. Counts below are report volumes, not rates, and cannot be compared between drugs. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical decisions — we show it because you deserve to see what is in the public record, with its limits stated plainly.

Read this before the numbers.

Anyone can send a report to the FDA. Patients can. Doctors can. Drug makers can. Nobody checks that the drug caused what the report describes.

There is also no bottom number. Tens of millions of prescriptions turn into reports at a rate nobody knows. Reports go up when a drug is in the news, and that is not the same as more harm.

So these are counts of reports. They are not rates. You cannot use them to compare one drug with another. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical choices.

We show it because it is on the public record, and you should get to see it with its limits named.

361,481
reports mentioning gabapentin, all time
229,940
filed as serious (a report-level flag covering every drug and outcome in the report)
filed as serious. That flag covers the whole report, and one report can name more than one drug and more than one outcome.

Most-reported reactions

  • Drug ineffective29,638
  • Fatigue24,972
  • Nausea22,728
  • Pain21,181
  • Off label use19,807
  • Diarrhoea18,114
  • Headache17,897
  • Dizziness16,238
  • Fall15,536
  • Dyspnoea14,256

“Drug ineffective” ranking this high is worth noticing: a report of not being helped counts as an adverse event too, and people file them in large numbers.

It is worth noticing how high “drug ineffective” ranks. A report that the drug did not help counts as an adverse event too. People file a lot of them.

Source: FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), via openFDA, openFDA dataset refreshed 2026-07-30 (the refresh date of the query endpoint, not the date reports run through).

Drug interactions listed on the gabapentin label

The FDA label’s interactions section, verbatim. A pharmacist checking your actual medication list beats any published list — including this one.

Below is the part of the FDA label that lists other drugs. It is copied word for word.

No list on the web can see what else you take. A pharmacist can. Ask one to check your full list.

Read the label’s interactions section

7 DRUG INTERACTIONS Concentrations increased by morphine; may need dose adjustment (5.4,7.1)

7.1 Opioids Respiratory depression and sedation, sometimes resulting in death, have been reported following coadministration of gabapentin with opioids (e.g., morphine, hydrocodone, oxycodone, buprenorphine) [ see Warnings and Precautions (5.8) ]. Hydrocodone Coadministration of gabapentin with hydrocodone decreases hydrocodone exposure [ see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. The potential for alteration in hydrocodone exposure and effect should be considered when gabapentin is started or discontinued in a patient taking hydrocodone. Morphine When gabapentin is administered with morphine, patients should be observed for signs of CNS depression, such as somnolence, sedation and respiratory depression [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

7.2 Other Antiepileptic Drugs Gabapentin is not appreciably metabolized nor does it interfere with the metabolism of commonly coadministered antiepileptic drugs [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

7.3 Maalox® (aluminum hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide) The mean bioavailability of gabapentin was reduced by about 20% with concomitant use of an antacid (Maalox ® ) containing magnesium and aluminum hydroxides. It is recommended that gabapentin be taken at least 2 hours following Maalox administration [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

7.4 Drug/Laboratory Test Interactions Because false positive readings were reported with the Ames N-Multistix SG ® dipstick test for urinary protein when gabapentin was added to other antiepileptic drugs, the more specific sulfosalicylic acid precipitation procedure is recommended to determine the presence of urine protein.

FDA label for gabapentin, effective August 27, 2026 — DailyMed.

Label history: when this label changes, it is recorded in What changed.

Who pays for gabapentin

Two claims datasets and one survey, covering different populations with different instruments — they cannot be reconciled by arithmetic, and where their sum crowds the all-payer estimate, that is a finding about the estimates rather than a percentage.

Medicare Part D · claims · 2024Medicaid · claims floor · 2024All-payer · survey · 2024Commercially insured adults · not publishedChildren · no per-drug data
Medicare Part D
Read the under-65 group correctly before the numbers: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population — among the sickest, highest-need people in the program — and reading their utilization as typical adult use would be a category error. The beneficiary total sums brand-level rows, so treat it as an upper bound on distinct people. 7,966,024 beneficiaries filled 36,824,304 claims in 2024 — 6,600,966 aged 65 and over, and 1,365,058 under 65.
Medicaid
At least 12,411,432 prescriptions in 2024 — a floor, because 420 of 2,285 national data rows are suppressed for privacy and contribute zero. Medicaid covers more children than any insurer in the country and publishes no age split — how much of this number is pediatric use is not knowable from public data.
All payers (survey estimate)
A survey estimate from 842 respondents, which we computed from AHRQ’s MEPS 2024 Prescribed Medicines file (people with at least one purchase, weighted; purchases include refills), puts the whole country at 46,937,114 purchases and 11,481,839 people in 2024. Subtracting the public programs from it would produce a number for everyone else — and we do not print that number, because subtracting a survey from claims counts manufactures precision that does not exist.
The population nobody counts
The commercially insured working-age adult — statistically, the likeliest person to be reading this page — is the one population with no public per-drug count anywhere. Private claims data exists and is sold, but nothing a patient can check is published. For children the record is thinner still: no public source counts pediatric use of gabapentin specifically; the closest the public record comes is condition-level treatment rates for children, which we have traced for one condition in how childhood ADHD got counted.

Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers — by Geography and Drug, data.cms.gov, National rows, data year 2024 (published with ~17-month lag). Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data 2024, data.medicaid.gov, national aggregate rows. Retrieved 2026-09-01.

Who has been paying for gabapentin, 2019–2024

Medicare Part D

Claims, all ages — the one payer with a public per-drug series.

20192024

31,565,326 → 36,824,304 claims

Medicare under 65

Beneficiaries, not ordinary working-age adults: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population. A gap is a suppressed split, not zero.

20192024

1,575,444 → 1,365,058 beneficiaries

Medicaid

A floor each year — small-cell rows are suppressed federally and excluded from the sum.

20192024

13,011,943 → 12,411,432 prescriptions (floor)

Commercially insured adults

No public dataset publishes per-drug commercial claims for any year — the absence is the finding, and it is rendered, not interpolated. The population this library most wants to inform is the one with no public per-drug series, in any year — insurers and PBMs hold that data privately. What the federal surveys do measure — how many adults take these medications at all — is on the adult-usage page.

Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers by Geography and Drug (data.cms.gov, national rows, per data year); Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data (data.medicaid.gov, national rows). Claims, fills and beneficiaries are different units — compare each series only with itself.

The gabapentin approval, step by step

  1. Step 1

    What the approval was actually based on

    Which studies did the FDA rely on, how long did they run, and who was in them?

    NEURONTIN was evaluated for the management of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of a total of 563 patients with pain for more than 3 months after healing of the herpes zoster skin rash (Table 6).

    FDA-approved labelling, 14 CLINICAL STUDIES 14.1 Postherpetic Neuralgia — read the label on DailyMed

    Our reading

    Read the indication, not the quote. Gabapentin is approved for nerve pain after shingles and as an add-on for epilepsy. It is not approved for anxiety, for bipolar disorder, for sleep, for alcohol withdrawal or for anything else psychiatric — and it is prescribed for all of them, constantly. There is no approval-grade evidence for any of those uses because no such application was ever made. In 2004 Parke-Davis's parent pleaded guilty and paid $430 million over the illegal promotion of gabapentin for exactly these off-label psychiatric uses. That is not an argument that it cannot help you. It is the reason you should ask what the recommendation is based on.

  2. Step 2

    The approval

    When was it approved, under what application, and by whose review?

    Approved
    December 30, 1993
    Application
    NDA020235
    Review
    PRIORITY
    Original sponsor
    Parke-Davis (now Viatris)
    Holds it now
    Viatris
    Label submissions since
    38

    Source: openFDA Drugs@FDA, original application ORIG-1

  3. Step 3

    What was added after it was on the market

    Which warnings arrived only after millions of people were already taking it?

    • Gabapentin and pregabalin can suppress breathing, and that is not a boxed warning

      26 years after approval

      In December 2019 the FDA warned that gabapentin and pregabalin can cause serious and potentially fatal respiratory depression. The risk concentrates in people with specific risk factors: taking opioids or other central nervous system depressants at the same time, existing respiratory impairment such as COPD, and older age.

      Being precise about what the FDA actually did, because this gets misreported constantly: it required new Warnings and Precautions labelling, not a boxed warning. The current Neurontin label has no boxed warning at all. Anyone telling you gabapentin carries a black-box warning for breathing problems is wrong, and getting it wrong makes the real warning easier to dismiss.

      The FDA also required manufacturers to run trials on abuse potential, particularly combined with opioids.

      Worth asking

      Does anything else I take count as a CNS depressant, and given my lungs and my age, what is the lowest dose that would work for me.

      Neurontin, Gralise, Horizant (gabapentin) and Lyrica, Lyrica CR (pregabalin): Drug Safety Communication — Serious Breathing Problems — U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2019)

    • Gabapentin, widely thought harmless, carries a respiratory depression warning for use with opioids and sedatives

      33 years after approval

      Gabapentin is prescribed for nerve pain, seizures, and off-label for anxiety and sleep. In 2019 the FDA added a breathing warning to its label. This is what the label now says.

      Significant findings

      NEURONTIN prescribing information (Viatris, August 2026), section 5.8, Respiratory Depression: "There is evidence from case reports, human studies, and animal studies associating gabapentin with serious, life-threatening, or fatal respiratory depression when coadministered with CNS depressants, including opioids, or in the setting of underlying respiratory impairment."

      What it asks of the prescriber: "When the decision is made to co-prescribe NEURONTIN with another CNS depressant, particularly an opioid, or to prescribe NEURONTIN to patients with underlying respiratory impairment, monitor patients for symptoms of respiratory depression and sedation, and consider initiating NEURONTIN at a low dose. The management of respiratory depression may include close observation, supportive measures, and reduction or withdrawal of CNS depressants (including NEURONTIN)."

      The same label's section 5.6 is the reason not to act on this alone: "Antiepileptic drugs should not be abruptly discontinued because of the possibility of increasing seizure frequency. When NEURONTIN is being discontinued, the dose should be tapered over at least a one-week period." It adds that withdrawal symptoms, and suicidal behaviour and ideation, have been reported after discontinuation.

      Worth asking

      Gabapentin is often added to a regimen that already contains a benzodiazepine, an antipsychotic or an opioid, precisely because it is thought to be the safe one. The label says the risk is in the stacking. Ask the prescriber which sedating drugs you are on, whether gabapentin is being started at a low dose because of them, and what symptoms of slowed breathing to watch for. The Gomes 2017 row in this wave gives the size of the opioid risk.

      NEURONTIN (gabapentin): FDA-approved prescribing information, Warnings and Precautions 5.6 and 5.8 — Viatris Specialty LLC; US Food and Drug Administration (2026)

  4. Step 4

    What independent research has found since

    What has been learned by people who were not selling it?

    • Opioid users co-prescribed gabapentin had about 50 percent higher odds of an opioid-related death

      24 years after approval

      The gabapentin label warns about breathing with opioids. This is the study behind the size of that risk.

      Significant findings

      Gomes and colleagues (PLoS Medicine, 2017) ran a population-based nested case-control study among opioid users in Ontario, Canada, from 1997 to 2013. Cases were opioid users who died of an opioid-related cause; each was matched with up to four opioid-using controls on age, sex, year, kidney disease and a disease risk index. "After matching, we included 1,256 cases and 4,619 controls."

      "Overall, 12.3% of cases (155 of 1,256) and 6.8% of controls (313 of 4,619) were prescribed gabapentin in the prior 120 days. After multivariable adjustment, co-prescription of opioids and gabapentin was associated with a significantly increased odds of opioid-related death (odds ratio [OR] 1.99, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.47, p < 0.001; adjusted OR [aOR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.88, p < 0.001) compared to opioid prescription alone."

      Dose mattered: moderate (900 to 1,799 mg daily) and high (1,800 mg or more) gabapentin "was associated with a nearly 60% increase in the odds of opioid-related death relative to no concomitant gabapentin use." The control comparison was clean: "we found no significant association between co-prescription of opioids and NSAIDs and opioid-related death," which is what you would expect if the gabapentin finding is about sedation rather than about being the kind of patient who takes a second drug.

      The abstract's framing sentence: "Although gabapentin is widely perceived as safe, drug-induced respiratory depression has been described when gabapentin is used alone or in combination with other medications."

      Worth asking

      Case-control designs cannot prove cause, and the authors adjusted for what the databases could see. What the NSAID comparison adds is a negative control: a second painkiller that does not sedate showed no such association. If you take gabapentin for anxiety or sleep and an opioid is proposed, or the reverse, the question is whether the prescriber has weighed this study, and at what gabapentin dose.

      Gabapentin, opioids, and the risk of opioid-related death: A population-based nested case-control study — Gomes T, Juurlink DN, Antoniou T, Mamdani MM, Paterson JM, van den Brink W (2017)

    • Withdrawal from these medications can take months, and NICE says so

      29 years after approval

      NICE guideline NG215 covers safe prescribing and managed withdrawal for five groups of medication: opioids, benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids, Z-drugs and antidepressants. It is the closest thing there is to an official answer on how coming off actually goes.

      It states that withdrawal can be difficult and may take several months or more, that symptoms vary widely in type and severity, that they affect both physical and mental health, and that they can be delayed in onset and can persist. Two recommendations are worth quoting to a prescriber. Do not stop a medicine abruptly except in exceptional medical circumstances. And taper using a slow, stepwise reduction proportionate to the current dose, so the decrements get smaller as the dose gets lower — not a fixed cut each time.

      That last detail is the one most commonly missed. Gabapentinoids are the exception in the guideline and are reduced by a fixed amount at each step.

      Worth asking

      Can we write the taper down, what size are the steps near the end, and how long do I hold at each step before the next reduction.

      Medicines associated with dependence or withdrawal symptoms: safe prescribing and withdrawal management for adults (NG215) — National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2022)

  5. Step 5

    What still is not known

    Which questions you might reasonably have has nobody answered yet?

    • If you were prescribed gabapentin for anxiety, sleep or mood, that use is not on the label and has no registration trial behind it.
    • The off-label psychiatric market for this drug was built by a marketing campaign that resulted in a criminal conviction. Where did your prescriber's confidence come from?
    • It is increasingly recognised as having withdrawal effects and misuse potential, neither of which was part of the 1993 approval.

The gabapentin legal and safety record

Settled and adjudicated matters only, from primary sources — including the litigation that was decided for the manufacturer, and the cases this drug is verifiably not part of.

Read the gabapentin legal and safety record

Deciding about gabapentin?

Open gabapentin (Neurontin) in veisund

The app has the full approval journey, the resources behind it, and people working through the same questions.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Browse the evidence library