Medication approval journey

mirtazapine (Remeron)

Approved for Major depressive disorder in adults

page first published · last updated

Also answers to “the midnight snack” — its codename in our videos and posts. The full codebook

FDA approvedAtypical antidepressantTaper risk: moderate

How this page reads

The page as written, with the clinical terms

Plain language uses the same facts, the same numbers and the same caveats. It does not leave anything out. Quotes from the FDA label are never reworded in either setting.

Before you stop or change your mirtazapine dose

Stopping abruptly causes withdrawal effects that can be severe

Withdrawal effects vary a lot across this group but are real. Any change should be prescriber-supervised rather than abrupt.

what the mirtazapine warnings mean

label facts below are read from the mirtazapine tablets FDA label on DailyMed, set id e38c96d4-ea33-3f1a-e053-2a95a90a0903, version 2, effective august 26, 2026 (nucare, anda 076921), the version the dossier above cites. the section numbers in brackets are the label’s own. every source is linked at the end of this section. last checked 2026-10-13.

mirtazapine was approved on june 14, 1996 under the brand remeron, for major depressive disorder in adults, and that is still the only use on its label [label 1; approval]. about 1.5 million americans filled a prescription for it in 2024, against about 1.3 million in 2014; the number of prescriptions moved from about 6.6 million to 5.6 million, a change within the survey’s margin of error [meps]. it is not a controlled substance; the label describes no abuse studies and lists "drug dependence" only as a rare trial report [label 6.1]. two numbers in its label explain most of what it is prescribed for outside that indication: somnolence in 54% of people against 18% on placebo, and increased appetite in 17% against 2% [label 5.7, 5.8]. sleep is not an approved use, and neither is appetite. the label carries one boxed warning and fifteen numbered warnings, among them a rare blood-count emergency, a serotonin syndrome contraindication, and weight and cholesterol figures that independent comparisons place at the top of the antidepressant list. this section says what each means in plain words, what the label does and does not say about its own trials, which side effects it counts and how often, and what the research has found about the approved use and the unapproved ones, in both directions. every number is from the label or from a study linked at the end.

this is information to take to a prescriber. nothing here is a reason to start, stop or change a dose on your own; the label itself says to reduce the dose gradually rather than stop abruptly whenever possible [label 2.6].

the boxed warning: suicidal thoughts and behaviors, by age

the boxed warning says antidepressants increased the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in pediatric and young adult patients in short-term studies, that everyone on one should be monitored closely for worsening, and that mirtazapine "is not approved for use in pediatric patients" [label, boxed warning and 5.1]. the number behind it is pooled placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants covering about 77,000 adults and 4,500 children. the label states the difference against placebo per 1,000 people treated: under 18, 14 additional patients; 18 to 24, 5 additional; 25 to 64, 1 fewer; 65 and older, 6 fewer [label 5.1, table 1]. it notes "considerable variation in risk" among drugs, that the risk beyond four months is unknown, and that prescribers should consider changing the regimen, "including possibly discontinuing mirtazapine", in anyone whose depression is persistently worse [label 5.1].

the warning is specific, not blanket: thoughts and behaviors, not deaths; the first months, not years; and above age 24 the pooled trials did not show an increase at all [label 5.1; age-ceiling]. the pediatric line rests on evidence the label describes: two placebo-controlled trials in 258 children and adolescents whose data "were insufficient to establish the safety and effectiveness" of the drug, and in one 8-week trial 49% of children on mirtazapine gained at least 7% of their body weight against 5.7% on placebo, a mean of 4 kg against 1 kg [label 8.4].

sleep and appetite are not approved uses, and what the record says about them

the indications section names one condition, major depressive disorder in adults [label 1]. insomnia is not an approved use, poor appetite is not an approved use, and no sleep or appetite trial appears anywhere in the label. what the label does carry is the dosing instruction to take it "preferably in the evening prior to sleep" [label 2.1], a warning that somnolence "may impair judgment, thinking, and/or motor skills" and that "it is unclear whether tolerance develops to the somnolent effects" [label 5.8], and, in the depression trials, superiority over placebo on the "sleep disturbance factor" of the depression rating scale, which is a cluster of items within a depression trial and not a sleep study [label 14]. the pharmacology section attributes the drowsiness to the drug’s blocking of histamine h1 receptors [label 12.2].

in favour. the two label numbers that drive the off-label uses are real and large: somnolence 54% against 18% and increased appetite 17% against 2% [label 5.7, 5.8]. in a cochrane review of 29 randomised trials in 4,974 people with depression, mirtazapine produced a response faster than ssris at two weeks (odds ratio 1.57) with a small edge remaining at six to twelve weeks (1.19), and caused less nausea and less sexual dysfunction than ssris [watanabe-2011]. in a meta-analysis of antidepressant trials in which sexual function was measured by questionnaire, mirtazapine was among the drugs showing no significant difference from placebo, while sertraline, venlafaxine, citalopram and paroxetine headed the list [serretti-2009]. for someone whose depression comes with insomnia, poor appetite, nausea on an ssri or sexual side effects, those are the facts a prescriber is weighing.

against, or smaller than it sounds. the library holds no randomised trial of mirtazapine for insomnia or for appetite in people who are not depressed, and this page states that absence rather than filling it. in the label’s own trials somnolence was the most common reason for stopping, 10.4% against 2.2% [label 6.1, table 2], and in the pooled premarketing studies 8% of people stopped for weight gain [label 5.7]. in a meta-analysis of 17 placebo-controlled trials in 2,131 adults, mirtazapine roughly quintupled the risk of weight gain (relative risk 4.75; about one extra person affected per ten treated), more than doubled somnolence (2.61; about one per four) and dizziness, and showed a possible but statistically unconfirmed increase in serious adverse events (odds ratio 1.82, confidence interval 0.95 to 3.48); several of its authors are prominent critics of antidepressants and disclosed royalties and consulting tied to deprescribing work, which the library record states [kamp-2025]. in the cochrane review the same sleepiness and weight gain that make the drug attractive for some were the side effects on which it did worse than ssris [watanabe-2011]. the drowsiness has no off switch at the doses the label describes, and its half-life of 20 to 40 hours, longer in women (37 hours) than men (26), means it is still present the next day [label 12.3].

the drug most often set beside mirtazapine for the sleep question is trazodone, which has its own explainer and the same "not an approved use" status for sleep [trazodone-explainer]; the two are compared side by side on this site [compare-trazodone].

weight, appetite and cholesterol, with the label’s numbers

warning 5.7 reports that in the us controlled trials appetite increase was 17% against 2% and weight gain of 7% or more of body weight was 7.5% against 0%; in the larger pool that included long-term open-label treatment, 8% stopped for weight gain; and in the 8-week pediatric trial, 49% against 5.7% gained 7% or more [label 5.7]. warning 5.11 adds the lipids: non-fasting cholesterol rising to 20% or more above the upper limit of normal in 15% against 7%, and triglycerides reaching 500 mg/dl or more in 6% against 3% [label 5.11]. the label gives no mean weight change in adults and no figure beyond six weeks of controlled treatment.

the independent record points the same way. a review of 116 studies of antidepressants and body weight placed mirtazapine, with amitriptyline and paroxetine, among the drugs with the greatest risk of weight gain, while bupropion and short-term fluoxetine tended toward loss; it included non-placebo-controlled studies and is graded conservatively in the library [serretti-2010]. the 17-trial placebo-controlled meta-analysis put the relative risk at 4.75 [kamp-2025]. the cochrane comparison found more weight gain or increased appetite than on ssris [watanabe-2011]. nothing in the label or the library says the weight comes back off.

the other warnings, in plain words

the warnings section runs from 5.1 to 5.15. the label describes mirtazapine as an antagonist at alpha-2 adrenergic, serotonin 5-ht2 and 5-ht3, histamine h1, peripheral alpha-1 and muscarinic receptors, and says its mechanism in depression "is unclear" [label 12.1, 12.2]. beyond those above:

  • agranulocytosis [5.2]: in the premarketing trials, 2 of 2,796 people developed agranulocytosis (a white-cell count below 500 with fever or infection) and a third developed severe neutropenia without symptoms, detected on days 61, 9 and 14; all three recovered after stopping. the label’s instruction: "if a patient develops a sore throat, fever, stomatitis, or other signs of infection, along with a low white blood cell count, treatment with mirtazapine should be discontinued". that is about one in a thousand in the trials, and it is a stop-and-test instruction to the prescriber, not routine monitoring.
  • serotonin syndrome and maois [4, 5.3, 2.4]: too much serotonin signalling, with agitation, hallucinations or delirium, racing heart, swinging blood pressure, sweating, fever, tremor, rigidity, muscle jerking, overactive reflexes, seizures, nausea and diarrhoea. the risk rises with triptans, tricyclics, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, tryptophan, buspirone, amphetamines and st john’s wort, and it can occur on mirtazapine alone. use with an maoi, including the antibiotic linezolid and intravenous methylene blue, is contraindicated within 14 days either way.
  • severe skin reactions [4, 5.6]: drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (dress), stevens-johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis have been reported after approval, and dress "is sometimes fatal"; the contraindication was added in november 2021 [label, recent major changes]. the instruction is to stop immediately if dress is suspected.
  • heart rhythm [5.5]: a 54-volunteer study found a relationship between mirtazapine concentration and qt prolongation, but at 45 mg and at 75 mg, 1.67 times the maximum dose, the prolongation "was not at a level generally considered to be clinically meaningful". after approval, qt prolongation, torsade de pointes, ventricular tachycardia and sudden death have been reported, mostly in overdose or in people with other risk factors or on other qt-prolonging drugs. the label asks for caution in known heart disease or a family history of long qt. in the trials, heart rate rose a mean 3.4 beats a minute against 0.8 [6.1].
  • low blood pressure and heart disease [5.15]: significant orthostatic hypotension in early volunteer studies, infrequent in depressed patients; the drug "has not been systematically evaluated" in people with a recent heart attack or other significant heart disease.
  • mania [5.9]: treating a depressive episode in someone with bipolar disorder can precipitate a mixed or manic episode; mania or hypomania was reported in 0.2% of trial patients, with bipolar disorder generally excluded; the label asks for screening first [2.3].
  • seizures [5.10]: one seizure among 2,796 trial patients; caution in a seizure disorder.
  • low sodium [5.12]: hyponatremia, with cases below 110 mmol/l, usually from inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion; signs are headache, poor concentration, memory impairment, confusion, weakness and unsteadiness "which may lead to falls"; older people and people on diuretics are at greater risk [8.5].
  • liver [5.13]: alt rising to three times the upper limit of normal in 2.0% (8 of 424) against 0.3% (1 of 328); in some people the enzymes returned to normal on continued treatment. clearance is about 30% lower in liver impairment and 30% to 50% lower in kidney impairment, and 75% of the drug leaves by the kidney [12.3].
  • glaucoma [5.4]: pupil dilation can trigger an angle-closure attack in an eye with untreated narrow angles.
  • benzodiazepines and alcohol [5.8, 7]: the impairment of thinking and motor skills "produced by mirtazapine alone" is additive with alcohol and with diazepam, and the label says to avoid both; alcohol did not change blood levels, the impairment is pharmacodynamic [12.3].
  • other drugs [7, 2.5]: carbamazepine and phenytoin roughly double clearance and cut blood levels by 60% and 45%; ketoconazole raises exposure by about 50%; cimetidine by more than 50%; the label says the dose may need to move with each. warfarin: a 0.2 rise in inr, so monitor. lithium and amitriptyline: no relevant change either way; mirtazapine did not change the levels of paroxetine or risperidone.
  • pregnancy and breastfeeding [8.1, 8.2]: "prolonged experience with mirtazapine in pregnant women, based on published observational studies and postmarketing reports, has not reliably identified a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, miscarriage or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes"; animal studies found no malformations at up to 20 times the human dose, with more pup deaths at that dose. in breast milk the relative infant dose was 0.6% to 2.8% in 8 mother-infant pairs, with no adverse effects reported in the infants.
  • older people [8.5, 12.3]: about 190 trial patients were 65 or over; clearance was 40% lower in older men and 10% lower in older women; the label warns of confusion and over-sedation and asks for a low starting dose.
  • post-marketing reports [6.2]: torsade de pointes, raised prolactin with milk production and breast enlargement, rhabdomyolysis, sleepwalking "and other complex behaviors out of bed", priapism, and the severe skin reactions above. these are voluntary reports, and the label says their frequency and cause cannot be established from them.

what the label says about its own trials

efficacy "was established in 4 placebo-controlled, 6-week trials in adult outpatients", dosed from 5 to 35 mg a day with a mean completer dose of 21 to 32 mg; overall the drug beat placebo "on at least 3 of the following 4 measures", the 21-item hamilton scale, its depressed-mood item, the clinical global impression and the montgomery-asberg scale [label 14]. the label does not report how many people were in each trial or the size of any difference; the adverse-reaction tables indicate the pooled us 6-week trials covered 453 people on mirtazapine against 361 on placebo [label 6.1]. a relapse-prevention study randomised people who had responded over 8 to 12 weeks to continued drug or placebo for up to 40 weeks, with "relapse during the double-blind phase ... determined by the individual investigators", and found lower relapse on the drug [label 14]. the dosing section describes 15 mg at night rising to a maximum of 45 mg, with changes no closer together than one to two weeks [label 2.1]. the label says no more than that, and the approval record on drugs@fda is linked below [approval].

side effects, with the label’s numbers

the label’s one-line summary: the most common reactions, at 5% or more and twice the placebo rate, are "somnolence, increased appetite, weight gain, and dizziness" [label 6]. among the 453 people on mirtazapine against 361 on placebo in the 6-week us trials: somnolence 54% against 18%, dry mouth 25% against 15%, increased appetite 17% against 2%, constipation 13% against 7%, weight gain 12% against 2%, asthenia 8% against 5%, dizziness 7% against 3%, flu syndrome 5% against 3%, abnormal dreams 4% against 1%, abnormal thinking 3% against 1%, tremor, back pain, myalgia, peripheral edema and urinary frequency 2% against 1%, confusion 2% against 0% [label 6.1, tables 3 and 4]. about 16% stopped for a side effect against 7% on placebo, somnolence (10.4% against 2.2%) and nausea (1.5% against 0%) being the reasons at twice placebo [label 6.1, table 2]. the label gives no figures by dose.

sexual side effects are not in the label’s tables; "impotence" appears as an infrequent trial report and "abnormal ejaculation" as rare [label 6.1], and raised prolactin with milk production and breast enlargement, and priapism, are post-marketing reports [label 6.2]. the independent record is more informative: when sexual function was measured by questionnaire across antidepressant trials, mirtazapine was among the drugs with no significant difference from placebo, while the ssris and venlafaxine ran from 26% to 80% [serretti-2009], and the cochrane comparison found less sexual dysfunction than on ssris [watanabe-2011]. this site’s page on the sexual side effects of antidepressants has the detail [ssri-sexual].

the discontinuation syndrome

warning 5.14 lists what has followed stopping mirtazapine, particularly abruptly: dizziness, abnormal dreams, sensory disturbances including tingling and electric-shock sensations, agitation, anxiety, fatigue, confusion, headache, tremor, nausea, vomiting and sweating. "a gradual reduction in the dosage, rather than an abrupt cessation, is recommended" [label 5.14, 2.6]. the label gives no schedule, no step size and no duration. the uk guideline for medicines associated with withdrawal says to taper in steps proportionate to the current dose, so the steps shrink as the dose falls, and that withdrawal "may take several months or more" [nice-2022]. in 2019 the royal college of psychiatrists conceded that for some people antidepressant withdrawal is severe and lasts longer than guidelines had said, and asked for tapering at a rate the patient can tolerate, potentially over several months, while stating that antidepressants are not associated with dependence in the addiction sense [rcpsych-2019]. none of this is a reason to stop; it is the reason the label says not to stop abruptly.

what the research says about the approved use, in both directions

in favour. in the network meta-analysis of 522 trials covering 116,477 adults with major depression, mirtazapine was one of seven antidepressants, of 21, that proved more effective than the others in head-to-head comparisons (odds ratios for that group 1.19 to 1.96), with a dropout rate about average; the analysis was publicly funded, most of the underlying trials were industry-funded, and several authors disclosed pharmaceutical fees [cipriani-2018]. the cochrane review of 29 trials found a faster response than ssris at two weeks and a small edge at six to twelve weeks [watanabe-2011]. in the sexual-function comparison it sat with the drugs no different from placebo [serretti-2009].

against, or smaller than it sounds. the one large placebo-controlled trial of the way mirtazapine is now most often added in practice found nothing: in 480 primary-care patients still depressed after at least six weeks on an ssri or snri, adding mirtazapine gave no clinically important benefit over adding placebo at 12 weeks (a difference of 1.83 points on the beck inventory, confidence interval crossing zero), and 46 people on mirtazapine against 9 on placebo stopped because of adverse effects [kessler-2018]. the side-effect meta-analysis found the weight and somnolence risks above and an unconfirmed signal on serious adverse events [kamp-2025]. the label’s own trial record is four 6-week trials reported without per-trial numbers [label 14]. the cochrane review’s early-response advantage came with more sleepiness and weight gain [watanabe-2011].

the warnings, measured. the suicidality warning’s size is the label’s table: 14 extra cases per 1,000 under 18, 5 at 18 to 24, none above [label 5.1]. the weight warning’s size is 7.5% against 0% gaining 7% or more in six weeks, 49% against 5.7% in children, and a relative risk of 4.75 across 17 trials [label 5.7; kamp-2025]. the somnolence warning’s size is 54% against 18% and a one-in-ten dropout for it [label 5.8; 6.1]. the agranulocytosis warning’s size is three people in 2,796 [label 5.2].

questions to ask your prescriber about mirtazapine

each one comes from a warning or a study above. they are questions, not instructions; the answers depend on a history nobody here has.

  • the label approves mirtazapine for depression in adults. if i am taking it for sleep or appetite, that is not an approved use, and the library has no trial of it for either. what is the evidence you are relying on, and for how long do you expect me to take it?
  • somnolence was 54% against 18% in the trials, the label says it is unclear whether tolerance develops, and the half-life is 20 to 40 hours. how do i tell whether next-day grogginess is the drug, and what would we do about it?
  • weight gain of 7% or more was 7.5% against 0% in six weeks, cholesterol rose in 15% against 7%, and 8% of people in the longer studies stopped for weight. are we weighing and checking lipids, and at what point would we change course?
  • the label says to stop and check a blood count if i get a sore throat, fever or mouth sores with signs of infection. who do i call if that happens, including out of hours?
  • i take carbamazepine, phenytoin, ketoconazole, cimetidine, warfarin, tramadol, a triptan, lithium, st john’s wort or a benzodiazepine. the label names each of these; is anything i take on that list?
  • the label says to avoid alcohol and benzodiazepines with mirtazapine because the impairment adds up. what does that mean for me in practice?
  • the label lists a discontinuation syndrome and says to reduce the dose gradually, but gives no schedule. if we ever reduce or stop, what would the schedule be?
  • if i am under 25: the boxed warning is about me, and the label says mirtazapine is not approved under 18 at all. who is watching for worsening in the first months, and what exactly should they watch for?
  • if mirtazapine is being added to an ssri or snri i already take: the largest placebo-controlled trial of that combination found no clinically important benefit and five times the dropout for side effects. what specific benefit do you expect?

questions people ask

what does the remeron (mirtazapine) black box warning mean?
it is the antidepressant class warning. in pooled placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants covering about 77,000 adults and 4,500 children, suicidal thoughts and behaviors increased in people under 25: 14 extra cases per 1,000 treated under 18 and 5 extra at 18 to 24, against 1 fewer at 25 to 64 and 6 fewer at 65 and over. the box also says mirtazapine is not approved for anyone under 18; the label reports two pediatric trials in 258 children whose data were insufficient to establish safety or effectiveness, and in one of them 49% of children gained at least 7% of their body weight in eight weeks. the warning says to watch everyone starting an antidepressant, especially in the first months and after dose changes. it describes thoughts and behaviors, not deaths.
is mirtazapine approved for sleep or for appetite?
no. the label approves mirtazapine for one condition, major depressive disorder in adults. insomnia and poor appetite are not approved uses, and no sleep or appetite trial appears anywhere on the label; the library holds none either. what the label has is the instruction to take it in the evening before sleep, somnolence in 54% of trial patients against 18% on placebo, and increased appetite in 17% against 2%, which are side effects recorded in depression trials. off-label prescribing is legal and common; what it means here is that the fda has never reviewed evidence that mirtazapine works for sleep or appetite in people who are not depressed, and the evidence that exists is the side-effect data and the comparisons against ssris in depression.
does mirtazapine cause weight gain?
yes, by the label’s own numbers and by every independent comparison in the library. in six-week trials, 7.5% of people on mirtazapine gained 7% or more of body weight against 0% on placebo, increased appetite was 17% against 2%, and in longer studies 8% stopped for weight gain; in one pediatric trial 49% of children gained 7% or more against 5.7%. cholesterol rose to 20% above normal in 15% against 7%. across 17 placebo-controlled trials the relative risk of weight gain was 4.75, about one extra person affected for every ten treated, and a review of 116 studies placed mirtazapine with amitriptyline and paroxetine among the antidepressants with the greatest weight gain. nothing in the label or the library says the weight comes back off while on the drug.
what are the most common mirtazapine side effects?
in the label’s six-week trials, 453 people on mirtazapine against 361 on placebo: somnolence 54% vs 18%, dry mouth 25% vs 15%, increased appetite 17% vs 2%, constipation 13% vs 7%, weight gain 12% vs 2%, asthenia 8% vs 5%, dizziness 7% vs 3%, abnormal dreams 4% vs 1%, abnormal thinking 3% vs 1%, confusion 2% vs 0%. about 16% stopped for a side effect against 7%, most often for somnolence (10.4% vs 2.2%). the label’s own summary of reactions at twice placebo is somnolence, increased appetite, weight gain and dizziness. it gives no figures by dose. sexual side effects were not measured in the label’s tables; independent comparisons found mirtazapine no different from placebo on that measure and better than ssris.
does mirtazapine cause sexual side effects?
less than most antidepressants, on the evidence in the library. when sexual function was measured by questionnaire across antidepressant trials rather than waited for as a complaint, mirtazapine was among the drugs with no significant difference from placebo, while sertraline, venlafaxine, citalopram and paroxetine headed a list running from 26% to 80% of patients affected; the cochrane comparison of 29 trials found less sexual dysfunction than on ssris. the label itself records impotence as an infrequent trial report, abnormal ejaculation as rare, and priapism and raised prolactin with milk production and breast enlargement as post-marketing reports without a rate.
what happens if you stop mirtazapine suddenly?
the label lists a discontinuation syndrome, particularly after abrupt stopping: dizziness, abnormal dreams, tingling and electric-shock sensations, agitation, anxiety, fatigue, confusion, headache, tremor, nausea, vomiting and sweating, and it recommends a gradual reduction whenever possible. it gives no schedule. the uk guideline says to taper in steps that shrink as the dose falls and that withdrawal may take several months or more, and the royal college of psychiatrists said in 2019 that for some people antidepressant withdrawal is severe and long. the two situations in which the label itself tells a patient to stop are the symptoms of serotonin syndrome and a suspected severe skin reaction, both as emergencies, and it tells the prescriber to stop the drug if a low white-cell count comes with signs of infection. anything else is a prescriber conversation.
does mirtazapine work for depression?
yes, on the trial record, and better than average against other antidepressants. the label describes four placebo-controlled six-week trials in which it beat placebo on at least three of four rating measures, without giving the numbers. in the network meta-analysis of 522 trials and 116,477 adults, mirtazapine was one of seven of 21 antidepressants that proved more effective in head-to-head comparisons, with about average dropout; the cochrane review of 29 trials found a faster response than ssris at two weeks with a small edge remaining at six to twelve weeks. the clear negative is the add-on use: in 480 primary-care patients still depressed on an ssri or snri, adding mirtazapine gave no clinically important benefit over placebo at 12 weeks and five times the dropout for side effects.
how is mirtazapine different from trazodone or sertraline?
all three carry the same boxed warning and the same not-approved-under-18 line. the label facts that differ: mirtazapine’s somnolence (54%), appetite (17%) and weight figures are the largest of the three, its sexual side-effect profile is the mildest, and it carries an agranulocytosis warning and a severe skin reaction contraindication the others do not; trazodone carries the priapism and heart-rhythm warnings and the same unapproved status for sleep. the trazodone and sertraline labels each have their own explainer on this site [trazodone-explainer; sertraline-explainer], and the drugs are compared side by side on the comparison pages [compare-trazodone; compare-sertraline]. nothing in any of the labels is a reason to prefer one drug; that is a prescriber’s decision.

sources for this section

the library rows link to our one-page summary of each study, with the original paper, its funding and our evidence grade on that page.

  1. mirtazapine tablets prescribing information, fda label on dailymed (set id e38c96d4-ea33-3f1a-e053-2a95a90a0903, version 2, effective august 26, 2026; nucare pharmaceuticals, anda 076921): boxed warning; sections 1, 2.1 to 2.6, 4, 5.1 to 5.15 with table 1, 6, 6.1 tables 2 to 4, 6.2, 7 table 5, 8.1, 8.2, 8.4, 8.5, 10, 12.1 to 12.3, 14; recent major changes
  2. drugs@fda, nda 020415 (remeron, organon), approved june 14, 1996
  3. ahrq medical expenditure panel survey, prescribed medicines public-use files 2014 (hc-168a) and 2024 (hc-254a): people with at least one mirtazapine purchase and prescriptions, weighted; the 2014 to 2024 prescription change is within the survey’s margin of error; computed by veisund, method on the usage section of this page
  4. the antidepressant suicidality warning’s age ceiling, from the labels themselves, as a library row (library row)
  5. national institute for health and care excellence. medicines associated with dependence or withdrawal symptoms (ng215), 2022 (library row)
  6. royal college of psychiatrists. position statement on antidepressants and depression (ps04/19), 2019 (library row)
  7. cipriani a, et al. comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. lancet 2018 (library row)
  8. watanabe n, et al. mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression. cochrane database of systematic reviews 2011 (29 trials, 4,974 participants) (library row)
  9. kessler ds, et al. mirtazapine added to ssris or snris for treatment resistant depression in primary care: phase iii randomised placebo controlled trial (mir). bmj 2018 (480 participants) (library row)
  10. kamp cb, et al. the risks of adverse events with mirtazapine for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. bmc psychiatry 2025 (17 trials, 2,131 participants; the library record notes the authors’ disclosed deprescribing interests) (library row)
  11. serretti a, mandelli l. antidepressants and body weight: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. journal of clinical psychiatry 2010 (116 studies; graded conservatively in the library) (library row)
  12. serretti a, chiesa a. treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction related to antidepressants: a meta-analysis. journal of clinical psychopharmacology 2009 (library row)
  13. the sexual side effects of antidepressants, a separate evidence page on this site
  14. what the trazodone (desyrel) warnings mean, the companion explainer on this site for the other antidepressant most often prescribed for sleep, also not an approved use
  15. what the sertraline (zoloft) warnings mean, the companion explainer on this site
  16. mirtazapine vs trazodone, the side-by-side comparison page on this site
  17. mirtazapine vs sertraline, the side-by-side comparison page on this site
we went and looked
  • overstateddoes nice tell clinicians in england to use cbt rather than antidepressants first?said on Lex Fridman Podcast, 2026-09-21; this part is true: england's depression guideline (nice ng222, june 2022) tells clinicians not to routinely offer antidepressants as first-line treatment for less severe depression unless the person makes an informed choice to take them, and cbt is one of the first-line options it recommends. in the evidence review nice commissioned, antidepressants showed no evidence of effect in less severe depression, and group cbt did.

every check quotes one sentence, links the original at the timestamp, and takes each assertion to the primary record. the full list: /checked.

How long the mirtazapine trials actually ran

The longest trial behind the mirtazapine approval ran 40 weeks.

The gap between how long the trials ran and how long people actually take these medications is the single most important thing on this page. It is not evidence that longer use is unsafe or ineffective. It is evidence that longer use was not what got tested.

People often stay on these drugs for far longer than the trials ran. The trials behind the approval ran 6 weeks.

That does not mean longer use is unsafe. It does not mean the drug stops working either. It means longer use was never the thing that got tested.

If you have been on it a long time, that is a fair thing to ask your prescriber about.

Boxed warning: suicidal thoughts and behaviors

The strongest warning the FDA puts on a label, often called a black box warning. It is reproduced below word for word, not summarised.

This is the strongest warning the FDA can put on a drug label. Some people call it a black box warning. We copied it word for word. We did not shorten it and we did not soften it.

The warning below is about suicidal thoughts. In short studies, antidepressants raised the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior. That was in children and young adults. The label tells prescribers to watch every patient closely for this. It also tells them to watch for the illness getting worse.

The FDA’s own words follow, copied exactly.

WARNING: SUICIDAL THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIORS Antidepressants increased the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in pediatric and young adult patients in short-term studies. Closely monitor all antidepressant-treated patients for clinical worsening, and for emergence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] . Mirtazapine tablets are not approved for use in pediatric patients [see Use in Specific Populations (8.4) ]. WARNING: SUICIDAL THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIORS See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior in pediatric and young adult patients taking antidepressants. Closely monitor all antidepressant-treated patients for clinical worsening and emergence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Mirtazapine tablets are not approved for use in pediatric patients. ( 5.1 , 8.4 )

FDA label effective August 26, 2026 — read the full label on DailyMed

What mirtazapine is FDA approved for, and the trials behind it

Approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults in 1996, under application NDA 020415. Source: FDA Drugs@FDA.

The label does not report enrollment or results for the individual efficacy trials; the participant figures above come from its pooled U.S. 6-week placebo-controlled safety data, and its efficacy discussion states only which rating scales favored mirtazapine.

Efficacy in major depressive disorder was established in 4 placebo-controlled, 6-week trials in adult outpatients meeting DSM-III criteria, with mirtazapine titrated from 5 to 35 mg per day; the mean dose among completers ranged from 21 to 32 mg per day. The label's pooled U.S. 6-week placebo-controlled trial data cover 453 patients on mirtazapine and 361 on placebo. A longer-term study randomized responders from 8 to 12 weeks of acute treatment to continued mirtazapine or placebo for up to 40 weeks of observation for relapse.

One gap first. The label does not report how many people were in each trial, or how each one came out.

The patient counts here come from its pooled US 6-week safety data. Its section on how well the drug worked says only which rating scales favored it.

The FDA approved mirtazapine in 1996. The approved use was major depression in adults. The file number is NDA 020415. The source is Drugs@FDA, the FDA's own database.

Four 6-week trials against a placebo backed the approval. Everyone was an adult outpatient who met the DSM-III rules for depression.

The dose was raised from 5 up to 35 mg a day. Among people who finished, the average dose ran from 21 to 32 mg a day.

The label’s pooled US 6-week data cover 453 people on the drug and 361 on a placebo.

A longer study took people who had done well over 8 to 12 weeks and split them by chance. Some stayed on the drug and some moved to a placebo. They were watched for up to 40 weeks to see if they got ill again.

Trials
4 placebo-controlled trials
Duration
6 weeks
Participants
453 patients on mirtazapine, 361 on placebo (pooled U.S. 6-week trials)
Compared against
Placebo
The efficacy of mirtazapine as a treatment for major depressive disorder was established in 4 placebo-controlled, 6-week trials in adult outpatients meeting DSM-III criteria for major depressive disorder. Patients were titrated with mirtazapine from a dose range of 5 mg to 35 mg/day. The mean mirtazapine dose for patients who completed these 4 studies ranged from 21 to 32 mg/day.

Verbatim from the mirtazapine FDA label, Clinical Studies section, effective August 26, 2026 — read the full label on DailyMed.

Side effects of mirtazapine in the approval trials

Incidence among 453 patients on mirtazapine versus 361 on placebo in 6-week U.S. placebo-controlled trials in major depressive disorder, dosed at 5 to 60 mg per day. The label itself cautions that trial adverse-reaction rates may not reflect the rates observed in practice.

Read the limits first. These numbers come from 6-week US trials against a placebo in major depression. Doses ran from 5 to 60 mg a day. 453 people took the drug and 361 took a placebo.

The label warns that real life may not match trial rates.

Weight gain on the mirtazapine label

The mirtazapine FDA label names weight gain in its Adverse Reactions section, in the list below.

  • Somnolence (54% vs 18% on placebo)
  • Dry mouth (25% vs 15%)
  • Increased appetite (17% vs 2%)
  • Constipation (13% vs 7%)
  • Weight gain (12% vs 2%)
  • Asthenia (8% vs 5%)
  • Dizziness (7% vs 3%)
  • Flu syndrome (5% vs 3%)
  • Abnormal dreams (4% vs 1%)
  • Abnormal thinking (3% vs 1%)
Most common adverse reactions (≥5% or greater and twice placebo) were somnolence, increased appetite, weight gain, and dizziness.

From the mirtazapine FDA label, Adverse Reactions section, effective August 26, 2026 — DailyMed.

More from the mirtazapine label: warnings and precautions

  • Stopping can produce a discontinuation syndrome

    The label reports adverse reactions on discontinuation of mirtazapine, particularly when abrupt, including dizziness, abnormal dreams, sensory disturbances such as paresthesia and electric shock sensations, agitation, anxiety, nausea, and sweating. A gradual reduction in dosage rather than abrupt cessation is recommended.

    FDA label, Warnings and Precautions section.

  • Sedation, appetite, and weight are the dominant trial findings

    In U.S. controlled studies, somnolence was reported in 54% of mirtazapine patients versus 18% on placebo and led to discontinuation in 10.4%; the label says it is unclear whether tolerance to the sedation develops. Appetite increase was reported in 17% versus 2%, and weight gain of 7% or more of body weight in 7.5% versus 0% on placebo.

    FDA label, Warnings and Precautions section.

  • Agranulocytosis in premarketing trials

    In premarketing trials, 2 of 2,796 patients developed agranulocytosis and a third developed severe neutropenia; all three recovered after stopping the drug. The label advises discontinuing mirtazapine if a patient develops a sore throat, fever, stomatitis, or other signs of infection with a low white blood cell count.

    FDA label, Warnings and Precautions section.

How many Americans take mirtazapine

Survey-based federal estimates, published with a lag of about two years. They count prescriptions filled, not outcomes.

These are federal survey numbers. They come out about two years late. They count prescriptions filled. They do not tell you if the drug helped.

5,605,882
prescriptions in the United States (2024), refills included
1,458,927
people filling them (2024), ± 287,291 (95%)

From 2014 to 2024 the estimate moved down 15%, but that is within the survey’s margin of error, so we do not call it a rise or a fall. Whatever you decide about mirtazapine, you are deciding alongside about 1,458,927 other people in 2024.

Prescriptions by year: 2014 6,562,968 · 2015 5,132,324 · 2016 5,547,698 · 2017 6,258,586 · 2018 7,504,258 · 2019 6,332,489 · 2020 6,601,132 · 2021 4,752,293 · 2022 6,069,480 · 2023 6,977,141 · 2024 5,605,882.

Prescriptions are not clearly up or down since 2014. About 1.5 million people in the United States took it in 2024.

Correction (29 September 2026). An earlier version of this section took its numbers from ClinCalc DrugStats, a third-party site that republishes this survey; we now compute them from AHRQ’s public-use files ourselves. It said prescriptions were down 15% since 2014; that change is within the survey’s margin of error, so we no longer state a direction.

Source: AHRQ Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Prescribed Medicines public-use files, 2014 (HC-168A) through 2024 (HC-254A), computed by veisund. People with at least one purchase where the Multum generic name (RXDRGNAM) equals the drug, weighted by the year’s person weight; purchases include refills. Standard errors by Taylor linearization on VARSTR/VARPSU. AHRQ’s reliability rule: a year is not shown when fewer than 60 survey respondents reported the drug or the relative standard error is over 50%. AHRQ cautions that its 2018 questionnaire redesign and the 2020–2022 pandemic years make year-to-year comparisons less certain.

What people report to the FDA about mirtazapine

Read this before the numbers.

Anyone can file an adverse event report — patients, doctors, manufacturers — and nobody verifies that the drug caused what was reported. There is no denominator: tens of millions of prescriptions generate reports at an unknowable rate, and reporting rises with news coverage, not necessarily with harm. Counts below are report volumes, not rates, and cannot be compared between drugs. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical decisions — we show it because you deserve to see what is in the public record, with its limits stated plainly.

Read this before the numbers.

Anyone can send a report to the FDA. Patients can. Doctors can. Drug makers can. Nobody checks that the drug caused what the report describes.

There is also no bottom number. Tens of millions of prescriptions turn into reports at a rate nobody knows. Reports go up when a drug is in the news, and that is not the same as more harm.

So these are counts of reports. They are not rates. You cannot use them to compare one drug with another. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical choices.

We show it because it is on the public record, and you should get to see it with its limits named.

91,067
reports mentioning mirtazapine, all time
76,315
filed as serious (a report-level flag covering every drug and outcome in the report)
filed as serious. That flag covers the whole report, and one report can name more than one drug and more than one outcome.

Most-reported reactions

  • Nausea5,028
  • Fatigue4,903
  • Drug ineffective4,788
  • Fall4,168
  • Diarrhoea4,114
  • Off label use3,998
  • Toxicity to various agents3,837
  • Dizziness3,586
  • Anxiety3,582
  • Dyspnoea3,535

“Drug ineffective” ranking this high is worth noticing: a report of not being helped counts as an adverse event too, and people file them in large numbers.

It is worth noticing how high “drug ineffective” ranks. A report that the drug did not help counts as an adverse event too. People file a lot of them.

Source: FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), via openFDA, openFDA dataset refreshed 2026-07-30 (the refresh date of the query endpoint, not the date reports run through).

Drug interactions listed on the mirtazapine label

The FDA label’s interactions section, verbatim. A pharmacist checking your actual medication list beats any published list — including this one.

Below is the part of the FDA label that lists other drugs. It is copied word for word.

No list on the web can see what else you take. A pharmacist can. Ask one to check your full list.

Read the label’s interactions section

7 DRUG INTERACTIONS Table 5 includes clinically important drug interactions with mirtazapine [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Table 5: Clinically Important Drug Interactions with Mirtazapine Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs) Clinical Impact The concomitant use of serotonergic drugs, including mirtazapine, and MAOIs increases the risk of serotonin syndrome. Intervention Mirtazapine is contraindicated in patients taking MAOIs, including MAOIs such as linezolid or intravenous methylene blue [see Dosage and Administration (2.4) , Contraindications (4) , Warnings and Precautions (5.3) ]. Examples selegiline, tranylcypromine, isocarboxazid, phenelzine, linezolid, methylene blue Other Serotonergic Drugs Clinical Impact The concomitant use of serotonergic drugs with mirtazapine increases the risk of serotonin syndrome. Intervention Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of serotonin syndrome, particularly during treatment initiation and dosage increases. If serotonin syndrome occurs, consider discontinuation of mirtazapine and/or concomitant serotonergic drugs [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3) ]. Examples SSRIs, SNRIs, triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, fentanyl, lithium, amphetamines, St. John’s Wort, tramadol, tryptophan, buspirone Strong CYP3A Inducers Clinical Impact The concomitant use of strong CYP3A inducers with mirtazapine decreases the plasma concentration of mirtazapine [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Intervention Increase the dose of mirtazapine if needed with concomitant CYP3A inducer use. Conversely, a decrease in dosage of mirtazapine may be needed if the CYP3A inducer is discontinued [see Dosage and Administration (2.5) ]. Examples phenytoin, carbamazepine, rifampin Strong CYP3A Inhibitors Clinical Impact The concomitant use of strong CYP3A inhibitors with mirtazapine may increase the plasma concentration of mirtazapine [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Intervention Decrease the dose of mirtazapine if needed with concomitant strong CYP3A inhibitor use. Conversely, an increase in dosage of mirtazapine may be needed if the CYP3A inhibitor is discontinued [see Dosage and Administration (2.5) ]. Examples itraconazole, ritonavir, nefazodone Cimetidine Clinical Impact The concomitant use of cimetidine, a CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A inhibitor, with mirtazapine may increase the plasma concentration of mirtazapine [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Intervention Decrease the dose of mirtazapine if needed with concomitant cimetidine use. Conversely, an increase in dosage of mirtazapine may be needed if cimetidine is discontinued [see Dosage and Administration (2.5) ]. Benzodiazepines and Alcohol Clinical Impact The concomitant use of benzodiazepines or alcohol with mirtazapine increases the impairment of cognitive and motor skills produced by mirtazapine alone. Intervention Avoid concomitant use of benzodiazepines and alcohol with mirtazapine [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8) , Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Examples diazepam, alprazolam, alcohol Drugs that Prolong QTc Interval Clinical Impact The concomitant use of other drugs which prolong the QTc interval with mirtazapine, increase the risk of QT prolongation and/or ventricular arrhythmias (e.g., Torsades de Pointes). Intervention Use caution when using mirtazapine concomitantly with drugs that prolong the QTc interval [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5) , Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Warfarin Clinical Impact The concomitant use of warfarin with mirtazapine may result in an increase in INR [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Intervention Monitor INR during concomitant use of warfarin with mirtazapine. Strong CYP3A inducers: Dosage increase may be needed for mirtazapine with concomitant use of strong CYP3A inducers. ( 2.5 , 7 ) Strong CYP3A inhibitors: Dosage decrease may be needed when mirtazapine is coadministered with strong CYP3A inhibitors. ( 2.5 , 7 ) Cimetidine: Dosage decrease may be needed when mirtazapine is coadministered with cimetidine. ( 2.5 , 7 ) Warfarin: Monitor INR during concomitant use. ( 7 )

FDA label for mirtazapine, effective August 26, 2026 — DailyMed.

Label history: when this label changes, it is recorded in What changed.

Who pays for mirtazapine

Two claims datasets and one survey, covering different populations with different instruments — they cannot be reconciled by arithmetic, and where their sum crowds the all-payer estimate, that is a finding about the estimates rather than a percentage.

Medicare Part D · claims · 2024Medicaid · claims floor · 2024All-payer · survey · 2024Commercially insured adults · not publishedChildren · no per-drug data
Medicare Part D
Read the under-65 group correctly before the numbers: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population — among the sickest, highest-need people in the program — and reading their utilization as typical adult use would be a category error. The beneficiary total sums brand-level rows, so treat it as an upper bound on distinct people. 1,647,984 beneficiaries filled 8,337,695 claims in 2024 — 1,403,164 aged 65 and over, and 244,820 under 65.
Medicaid
At least 2,690,928 prescriptions in 2024 — a floor, because 113 of 575 national data rows are suppressed for privacy and contribute zero. Medicaid covers more children than any insurer in the country and publishes no age split — how much of this number is pediatric use is not knowable from public data.
All payers (survey estimate)
A survey estimate from 116 respondents, which we computed from AHRQ’s MEPS 2024 Prescribed Medicines file (people with at least one purchase, weighted; purchases include refills), puts the whole country at 5,605,882 purchases and 1,458,927 people in 2024. Subtracting the public programs from it would produce a number for everyone else — and we do not print that number, because subtracting a survey from claims counts manufactures precision that does not exist.
The population nobody counts
The commercially insured working-age adult — statistically, the likeliest person to be reading this page — is the one population with no public per-drug count anywhere. Private claims data exists and is sold, but nothing a patient can check is published. For children the record is thinner still: no public source counts pediatric use of mirtazapine specifically; the closest the public record comes is condition-level treatment rates for children, which we have traced for one condition in how childhood ADHD got counted.

Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers — by Geography and Drug, data.cms.gov, National rows, data year 2024 (published with ~17-month lag). Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data 2024, data.medicaid.gov, national aggregate rows. Retrieved 2026-09-01.

Who has been paying for mirtazapine, 2019–2024

Medicare Part D

Claims, all ages — the one payer with a public per-drug series.

20192024

7,056,309 → 8,337,695 claims

Medicare under 65

Beneficiaries, not ordinary working-age adults: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population. A gap is a suppressed split, not zero.

20192024

263,015 → 244,820 beneficiaries

Medicaid

A floor each year — small-cell rows are suppressed federally and excluded from the sum.

20192024

2,424,266 → 2,690,928 prescriptions (floor)

Commercially insured adults

No public dataset publishes per-drug commercial claims for any year — the absence is the finding, and it is rendered, not interpolated. The population this library most wants to inform is the one with no public per-drug series, in any year — insurers and PBMs hold that data privately. What the federal surveys do measure — how many adults take these medications at all — is on the adult-usage page.

Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers by Geography and Drug (data.cms.gov, national rows, per data year); Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data (data.medicaid.gov, national rows). Claims, fills and beneficiaries are different units — compare each series only with itself.

The mirtazapine approval, step by step

  1. Step 1

    What the approval was actually based on

    Which studies did the FDA rely on, how long did they run, and who was in them?

    The efficacy of REMERON as a treatment for major depressive disorder was established in 4 placebo-controlled, 6-week trials in adult outpatients meeting DSM-III criteria for major depressive disorder... In a longer-term study, patients meeting (DSM-IV) criteria for major depressive disorder who had responded during an initial 8 to 12 weeks of acute treatment on REMERON were randomized to continuation of REMERON or placebo for up to 40 weeks of observation for relapse.

    FDA-approved labelling, 14 CLINICAL STUDIES — read the label on DailyMed

    Our reading

    Four six-week trials, plus a forty-week continuation study of the enriched kind: only people who had already responded were randomised, so it measures whether the drug keeps working for people it already works for. Mirtazapine is very often prescribed at low dose specifically for sleep and appetite rather than for depression. That use is not in these trials and is not in the indication.

  2. Step 2

    The approval

    When was it approved, under what application, and by whose review?

    Approved
    June 14, 1996
    Application
    NDA020415
    Review
    STANDARD
    Original sponsor
    Organon
    Holds it now
    Organon
    Label submissions since
    31

    Source: openFDA Drugs@FDA, original application ORIG-1

  3. Step 3

    What was added after it was on the market

    Which warnings arrived only after millions of people were already taking it?

  4. Step 4

    What independent research has found since

    What has been learned by people who were not selling it?

  5. Step 5

    What still is not known

    Which questions you might reasonably have has nobody answered yet?

    • If you were prescribed it for sleep or appetite, these trials are not about that use.
    • The forty-week study randomised only people who had already responded. It does not tell you your chance of responding.
    • Weight gain and sedation are the most common reasons people stop. Six weeks is short for judging either.

Deciding about mirtazapine?

Open mirtazapine (Remeron) in veisund

The app has the full approval journey, the resources behind it, and people working through the same questions.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Browse the evidence library