Medication approval journey
olanzapine (Zyprexa)
Approved for Schizophrenia in adults
page first published · last updated
Also answers to “the billion dollar apology” — its codename in our videos and posts. The full codebook
How this page reads
The page as written, with the clinical terms
Plain language uses the same facts, the same numbers and the same caveats. It does not leave anything out. Quotes from the FDA label are never reworded in either setting.
Before you stop or change your olanzapine dose
Stopping abruptly can be dangerous — never do it without medical supervision
Do not stop an antipsychotic abruptly. Abrupt withdrawal can cause rebound or supersensitivity psychosis and withdrawal movement disorders, and relapse risk is highest with the fastest reductions. Any change should be a slow, prescriber-supervised taper.
what the olanzapine warnings mean
label facts below are read from the Zyprexa (olanzapine) FDA label on DailyMed, set id b418946a-1ab4-4d89-a012-d94fc361a3c4, version 68, effective february 11, 2026, the version the dossier above cites; the long-acting injection facts are from the Zyprexa Relprevv label, set id 11544cba-64a9-49cb-8d74-da228053b252, version 68, effective may 19, 2026. the section numbers in brackets are the labels’ own. every source is linked at the end of this section. last checked 2026-10-06.
olanzapine was approved on september 30, 1996 for schizophrenia, and later for manic or mixed episodes of bipolar i disorder and bipolar maintenance, as an add-on to lithium or valproate for mania, as a short-acting injection for agitation, and in a fixed combination with fluoxetine for bipolar depression and treatment-resistant depression [label 1; approval]. on its own it is not approved for depression of any kind [label 1.5, 1.6]. the federal survey this site uses for a scale line does not report a usable count for olanzapine in any year from 2014 to 2024, because fewer than 60 respondents reported it in each year, under ahrq’s reliability rule, so this page gives no number of people taking it [meps]. its label carries one boxed warning, on deaths among older people with dementia, and seventeen numbered warnings, the longest of which is the metabolic one. olanzapine’s weight, blood sugar and lipid tables are the largest numbers in this site’s antipsychotic explainers, and the label prints them out to three years; the same label records no movement side effects above placebo at the usual dose and no heart-rhythm signal. this section says what each warning means in plain words, what the approval trials measured and for how long, which side effects the label counts and how often, what the long-acting injection’s own boxed warning says, and what independent research has found since, in both directions. every number is from the labels or from a study linked at the end.
the legal and safety record for this drug has its own page on this site and is not repeated here [legal-record]. this is information to take to a prescriber. nothing here is a reason to start, stop or change a dose on your own; the label itself lists a discontinuation reaction (sweating, nausea, vomiting) among the reactions reported since marketing [label 6.2].
the boxed warning: deaths among older people with dementia-related psychosis
the boxed warning says that elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death, and that olanzapine is not approved for them [label, boxed warning and 5.1]. the class number is a pooled analysis of 17 placebo-controlled trials, mostly of atypical antipsychotics and mostly about 10 weeks long: about 4.5% died on drug against about 2.6% on placebo, 1.6 to 1.7 times the rate, mostly from cardiovascular causes such as heart failure or sudden death, or infectious ones such as pneumonia [label, boxed warning; fda-dementia]. the label adds that observational studies suggest the older, conventional antipsychotics may carry the same risk, and that how much of that is the drug and how much the patients is not clear [label, boxed warning].
unlike most labels in the class, this one also prints an olanzapine-specific figure: in the placebo-controlled trials of olanzapine in elderly people with dementia-related psychosis, 3.5% died against 1.5% on placebo [label 5.1]. those trials also found significantly more strokes and transient ischaemic attacks, including fatal ones, on olanzapine than on placebo [label 5.1], and in 5 of them (1,184 people) falls, somnolence, swelling of the legs, abnormal gait, urinary incontinence, lethargy, weight gain, weakness, fever, pneumonia, dry mouth and visual hallucinations were all more common on olanzapine, with 13% stopping for side effects against 7% [label 8.5]. the label says nothing about the drug being less safe in older people with schizophrenia, where it found no difference in tolerability [label 8.5].
olanzapine does not carry the antidepressant suicidality boxed warning on its own, because it is not approved as an antidepressant on its own; the fixed combination with fluoxetine does, and the label sends the reader to that product’s boxed warning [label, boxed warning]. its own warning 5.2 says the possibility of a suicide attempt is inherent in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, that high-risk patients need close supervision, and that prescriptions should be for the smallest quantity of tablets consistent with good management, to reduce the risk of overdose [label 5.2].
the metabolic warning, with the label’s tables
warning 5.5 opens by saying atypical antipsychotics as a class cause hyperglycemia, lipid changes and weight gain, and then does something few labels do: it says where olanzapine sits in the class. on blood sugar, "the association between atypical antipsychotics and increases in glucose levels appears to fall on a continuum and olanzapine appears to have a greater association than some other atypical antipsychotics" [label 5.5]. the label asks for fasting glucose and a fasting lipid profile at the start and periodically, and regular weight monitoring [label 5.5, 5.17]. the tables below are the label’s; where it gives a long-term column, so does this page.
- weight, adults [5.5]: in 13 placebo-controlled trials with a median 6 weeks of exposure, people on olanzapine gained a mean 2.6 kg while people on placebo lost 0.3 kg; 22.2% gained 7% or more of their body weight against 3%, and 4.2% gained 15% or more against 0.3%. in long-term studies of at least 48 weeks (2,021 people, median 573 days), the mean gain was 5.6 kg, and 64% had gained 7% or more, 32% had gained 15% or more, and 12% had gained a quarter of their body weight or more. gain was seen across every starting body-mass index, and it rose with dose: 1.9 kg at 10 mg, 2.3 kg at 20 mg and 3.0 kg at 40 mg over 8 weeks.
- weight, the distribution the label prints [5.5, table 6]: among adults who completed 6 months, 10.9% had gained 10 to 15 kg and 4.3% more than 15 kg; among those who completed 12 months, 14.9% had gained 10 to 15 kg and 14.1% more than 15 kg; among the 147 people who completed 36 months, 17.0% had gained 10 to 15 kg, 11.6% 15 to 20 kg and 10.9% more than 20 kg. these are completers, so the people who stopped because of weight gain are not in the columns; the label says 0.2% stopped for that reason in the short trials and 0.4% in the long ones.
- weight, adolescents aged 13 to 17 [5.5, tables 7 and 8]: a mean 4.6 kg gained in a median 3 weeks against 0.3 kg on placebo, with 40.6% gaining 7% or more against 9.8%. in studies of at least 24 weeks (179 adolescents, median 201 days) the mean gain was 11.2 kg, and 89%, 55% and 29% had gained at least 7%, 15% and 25% of their starting weight. the label states that adolescents gain more than adults and tells prescribers that this "may lead them to consider prescribing other drugs first in adolescents" [label 1.1, 1.2, 8.4].
- blood sugar, adults [5.5, table 2]: in trials up to 12 weeks, 2.2% of people with a normal fasting glucose crossed the diabetes threshold of 126 mg/dl, against 3.4% on placebo; in studies of at least 48 weeks, 12.8% did. of people who started borderline (100 to 125 mg/dl), 17.4% crossed 126 within 12 weeks against 11.5%, and 26.0% in the long-term studies. mean fasting glucose rose 2.76 mg/dl against 0.17 over about 3 weeks; in the catie trial, over a median 9.2 months, the mean rise in glucose was 15.0 mg/dl. the label reports hyperglycemia "in some cases extreme and associated with ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma or death" with atypical antipsychotics including olanzapine, and diabetic coma and ketoacidosis among post-marketing reports [label 5.5; 6.2].
- lipids, adults [5.5, table 4]: over up to 12 weeks, mean fasting triglycerides rose 20.8 mg/dl on olanzapine while falling 10.7 on placebo, total cholesterol rose 5.3 while falling 6.1, and ldl rose 3.0 while falling 4.3. triglycerides rose by 50 mg/dl or more in 39.6% against 26.1% in the short trials and in 61.4% in the long ones; total cholesterol crossed 240 mg/dl from normal in 2.8% against 2.4% short-term and 14.8% long-term, and from borderline in 23.0% against 12.5% short-term and 55.2% long-term. in catie, triglycerides rose a mean 40.5 mg/dl over 9.2 months. the label notes that very high triglycerides, over 500 mg/dl, have been observed, and random readings over 1,000 mg/dl have been reported since marketing.
- blood sugar and lipids, adolescents [5.5, tables 3 and 5]: total cholesterol rose a mean 12.9 mg/dl against 1.3, ldl 6.5 against 1.0, and triglycerides 28.4 against a fall of 1.1 over 3 to 6 weeks; 37.0% had a triglyceride rise of 50 mg/dl or more against 15.2%. fasting glucose shifts to the diabetes threshold were rare at 6 weeks (0% against 1.9%) and 0.9% at 24 weeks.
prolactin, movement, blood pressure: the other warnings in plain words
the warnings section runs from 5.1 to 5.17. beyond the boxed warning and the metabolic one:
- prolactin [5.15]: olanzapine raises prolactin and the rise "persists during chronic administration". in trials up to 12 weeks, 30% of adults shifted from a normal to a high level against 10.5% on placebo; in adolescents, 47% against 7%. across 8,136 adults the clinical signs the label could attribute were menstrual changes in 2% of women, sexual-function events in 2% of women and men, and breast events (discharge, enlargement, milk production, gynecomastia) in 0.7% of women and 0.2% of men; in 454 adolescents, breast events in 2% of girls and 2% of boys. the share with a high prolactin rose with dose: 31.2% at 10 mg, 42.7% at 20 mg, 61.1% at 40 mg over 8 weeks. high prolactin can suppress reproductive hormones, and the label says it may reversibly reduce fertility in women [8.3].
- tardive dyskinesia [5.6]: involuntary, potentially irreversible movements, most often after long treatment and high cumulative doses. the label says whether antipsychotics differ in their potential to cause it is unknown, and that chronic treatment should be reserved for chronic illness with no equally effective, less harmful alternative, at the smallest dose and shortest duration that works, with the need reassessed periodically.
- acute movement side effects [6.1, tables 16 and 17]: in the fixed-dose schizophrenia trial, any extrapyramidal event was reported by 15%, 25% and 32% at about 5, 10 and 15 mg against 16% on placebo; akathisia by 5%, 11% and 10% against 1%; parkinsonism by 8%, 14% and 20% against 10%. on the rating scales the picture was flatter: parkinsonism 12% to 14% against 15%, akathisia 16% to 27% against 23%. the label states that acute dystonia, including neck spasm and tongue protrusion, is a class effect that is more common in young men and at higher doses of the older drugs.
- low blood pressure, fainting and falls [5.7, 5.8]: orthostatic hypotension was recorded in 20% or more of 6,030 adults across 41 trials when vital signs were measured, and fainting in 0.6%. the label says starting at 5 mg lowers the risk, and that alcohol and diazepam make it worse [7.1]. with the short-acting injection, about a third of people given three 10 mg doses four hours apart had a significant fall in standing blood pressure, and the label says an injected benzodiazepine should not be given alongside it [5.7]. a fall-risk assessment is asked for in anyone whose other conditions or medicines add to drowsiness or unsteadiness.
- neuroleptic malignant syndrome [5.3] and dress [5.4]: nms is a rare, potentially fatal reaction with very high temperature, rigid muscles, confusion and unstable pulse or blood pressure; the label says stop at once and treat in hospital. dress (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) is a rash with fever, swollen glands and inflammation of the liver, kidneys, lungs or heart, "sometimes fatal"; the label says stop if it is suspected.
- low white cells [5.9], seizures [5.11], swallowing [5.10], heat [5.13]: leukopenia and neutropenia have been reported with olanzapine, with frequent blood counts asked for in anyone with a low count or a history of drug-induced neutropenia. seizures occurred in 0.9% of 2,500 people in the premarketing trials, many with confounding factors. aspiration pneumonia and impaired cooling are class cautions.
- drowsiness [5.12]: somnolence in 26% against 15%, dose-related, and it led 0.4% to stop. the label says not to drive or operate machinery until the effect is known.
- anticholinergic effects [5.14]: constipation, dry mouth and fast heart rate in the trials, and since marketing "the risk for severe adverse reactions (including fatalities) was increased with concomitant use of anticholinergic medications". the label asks for caution in anyone with urinary retention, an enlarged prostate, constipation or a history of paralytic ileus, and with other anticholinergic drugs [7.1].
- liver enzymes [6.1]: alt rose to three times the upper limit of normal in 5% of adults against 1% on placebo, and to five times in 2% against 0.3%, usually transient and without jaundice or liver failure; in adolescents, 12% against 2%. it was the one reaction the label calls a drug-related reason for stopping in the schizophrenia trials (2% against 0%). cholestatic and mixed liver injury, hepatitis and jaundice are among the post-marketing reports [6.2].
- heart rhythm [6.1]: no significant difference from placebo in qt, qtc or pr intervals in pooled adult or adolescent studies, and a mean heart-rate rise of 2.4 beats per minute in adults and 6.3 in adolescents.
- interactions [7.1]: carbamazepine raises olanzapine clearance by about 50%, and rifampin and omeprazole may do the same; fluvoxamine raises olanzapine levels by half to double and the label says to consider a lower dose. tobacco smoke induces the same liver enzyme: the label names non-smoking as a reason for a 5 mg start [2.1], and two studies linked at the end measured the effect at about double the blood level per milligram in non-smokers, with the level climbing when a person stops smoking [haslemo-2006; zullino-2002].
- pregnancy and breastfeeding [8.1, 8.2]: babies exposed to any antipsychotic in the third trimester are at risk of movement and withdrawal symptoms after birth. the label says published studies of olanzapine in pregnancy "have not established a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes", that a medicaid cohort of 9,258 women exposed to antipsychotics did not show an overall increase in major birth defects, and that untreated schizophrenia or bipolar disorder carries its own risks to the mother. olanzapine passes into breast milk, with reports of excess sedation, irritability, poor feeding and tremor in breastfed infants.
the long-acting injection: a second boxed warning and a restricted program
zyprexa relprevv, the olanzapine pamoate injection given every two to four weeks, carries a boxed warning the tablets do not: post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome. after an injection, some people develop signs of olanzapine overdose, from dizziness, confusion, slurred speech and unsteadiness to seizures and coma, apparently because the drug entered the bloodstream faster than intended; the label says the exact mechanism is not known [relprevv, boxed warning and 5.1]. the label’s numbers: events occurred in fewer than 0.1% of injections and in approximately 2% of patients who received injections for up to 46 months; most were hospitalised, several needed intubation, and all had largely recovered by 72 hours. the risk is the same at each injection, so it accumulates with the number of injections [relprevv 5.1].
because of this, the injection is available only through a restricted distribution program (a rems) in which the prescriber, the healthcare setting, the patient and the pharmacy must all be enrolled, it must be given in a certified setting with ready access to emergency services, and the patient must be observed by a healthcare professional for at least 3 hours after every injection, confirmed alert and oriented before leaving, accompanied home, and told not to drive or operate machinery for the rest of that day [relprevv 2.1, 5.2]. tolerability must be established with oral olanzapine first, and the injection has not been studied in anyone under 18 [relprevv 2.1]. its efficacy rests on one 8-week trial and one 24-week maintenance trial in adults [relprevv 1.1, 2.1]. the metabolic, prolactin and dementia warnings are the same as the tablets’; in its own 24-week fixed-dose trial, weight gain was 0.67 kg at the lowest dose and 1.70 kg at the highest [relprevv 5.7].
what the approval trials measured, and for how long
schizophrenia in adults rests on two 6-week trials of inpatients. the first (149 people) compared 1 mg and 10 mg with placebo: 10 mg beat placebo and 1 mg did not. the second (253 people) compared three dose ranges of about 5, 10 and 15 mg: the two higher groups beat placebo, with "no clear advantage for the high-dose group over the medium-dose group" [label 14.1]. a third trial took 326 outpatients who had been stable on olanzapine for at least 8 weeks and randomised them to continue or switch to placebo; it was stopped early because of an excess of relapses on placebo, so the observation ran up to 8 months rather than the planned 12 [label 14.1]. the label says doses above 10 mg were not shown to be more effective than 10 mg, and that olanzapine is not indicated above 20 mg a day [label 2.1]. one 6-week trial in 107 adolescents established the adolescent indication, at a mean dose of about 11 mg [label 14.1].
mania rests on one 3-week trial of 67 people and one 4-week trial of 115; a second 3-week trial run at the same time with the same design "was not shown to be superior to placebo" [label 14.2]. maintenance rests on a randomised-withdrawal trial of 361 people who had responded for about two weeks on average and were then kept on olanzapine or switched to placebo: half of the placebo group had left by day 23 and half of the olanzapine group by day 59 [label 14.2]. the add-on indication rests on two 6-week trials of 175 and 169 people already on lithium or valproate, and the adolescent mania indication on one 3-week trial of 161 [label 14.2]. the agitation indication for the short-acting injection rests on three 24-hour trials measured at two hours [label 14.3].
the arithmetic that matters: the efficacy trials were 3 to 6 weeks, the longest controlled measurement was about 8 months, and the label’s own long-term weight and lipid columns run to 36 months in people who stayed on it that long. the label asks the prescriber who continues it to "periodically reevaluate the long-term usefulness of the drug for the individual patient" [label 2.1, 2.2].
side effects, with the label’s numbers
in the 6-week schizophrenia trials (248 on olanzapine against 118 on placebo), the reactions at 5% or more and at least twice placebo were dizziness 11% against 4%, constipation 9% against 3%, weight gain 6% against 1%, postural hypotension 5% against 2%, akathisia 5% against 1%, and what the label’s old coding dictionary calls personality disorder, meaning non-aggressive objectionable behaviour, 8% against 4% [label 6.1, table 9]. in the 3- and 4-week mania trials (125 against 129): somnolence 35% against 13%, dry mouth 22% against 7%, dizziness 18% against 6%, weakness 15% against 6%, constipation 11% against 5%, dyspepsia 11% against 5%, increased appetite 6% against 3%, tremor 6% against 3% [label 6.1, table 10]. across all the short placebo-controlled trials (532 against 294): somnolence 29% against 13%, accidental injury 12% against 8%, dizziness 11% against 4%, abnormal gait 6% against 1%, fever 6% against 2% [label 6.1, table 11]. dropouts for side effects were 5% against 6% in schizophrenia and 2% against 2% in mania [label 6.1].
added to lithium or valproate (229 against 115), the numbers are the highest on the page: somnolence 52% against 27%, dry mouth 32% against 9%, weight gain 26% against 7%, increased appetite 24% against 8%, tremor 23% against 13%, dizziness 14% against 7%, speech disorder 7% against 1%, and 11% stopped for side effects against 2% [label 6.1, tables 13 and 14]. in adolescents (179 against 89): sedation 44% against 9%, weight increased 30% against 6%, increased appetite 24% against 6%, liver enzymes increased 8% against 1% [label 6.1, table 22].
in overdose, the label reports 67 cases in the premarketing trials, the largest 300 mg with drowsiness and slurred speech only, and since marketing one death possibly from as little as 450 mg taken alone against another person surviving about 2 grams [label 10.1]. olanzapine is not a controlled substance and "has not been systematically studied in humans for its potential for abuse, tolerance, or physical dependence" [label 9.3].
what the research says, in both directions
in favour. in a network meta-analysis of 402 randomised trials covering 53,463 adults with schizophrenia, all 32 antipsychotics reduced symptoms more than placebo and the drugs differed more in side effects than in effectiveness [huhn-2019]. in the lurasidone label’s trial that used olanzapine 15 mg as an active comparator, olanzapine’s placebo-subtracted change on the positive and negative syndrome scale was the larger (12.6 points against 9.7 and 7.5 for the two lurasidone doses), although that trial was not designed to compare the drugs [lurasidone-explainer]. olanzapine’s side-effect profile runs the other way from lurasidone’s: no movement-disorder penalty on the rating scales in the label’s fixed-dose trial [label 6.1, table 16] and no heart-rhythm signal [label 6.1]. the label’s pregnancy section says published studies have not established a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, in its own words [label 8.1].
against, or larger than it sounds. the same metabolic network meta-analysis ranked olanzapine, with clozapine, as having the worst metabolic profile of 18 antipsychotics: the largest rise in body-mass index against placebo (1.07 kg/m2) and the largest rise in ldl cholesterol (0.20 mmol/l), over a median of only 6 weeks [pillinger-2020; pillinger-2020, abstract]. the label’s long-term columns say what 6 weeks cannot: a mean 5.6 kg at a year, 64% gaining 7% or more, and 12.8% of people with normal blood sugar crossing the diabetes threshold [label 5.5]. in 6,671 uk patients on maintenance treatment for bipolar disorder, self-harm rates were roughly 40% to 50% higher on olanzapine, quetiapine or valproate than on lithium, with the usual caution that people prescribed different drugs differ [hayes-2016]. an english case-control study of 58,769 people with dementia found the highest cumulative exposure to strongly anticholinergic drugs, a group that includes olanzapine, associated with about 49% higher odds of dementia, 70% for the antipsychotic class; early dementia leading to prescriptions is the standard alternative explanation [coupland-2019]. tardive dyskinesia remains at about one in five on the newer antipsychotics as a class [carbon-2017].
smoking and cannabis. two studies in the library measure what the label only names. in 73 nursing-home patients on clozapine or olanzapine, non-smokers had about twice the blood level per milligram, and seven to twelve cigarettes a day was enough for the full effect; the authors suggested a 50% lower starting dose in non-smokers [haslemo-2006]. two case reports describe the interaction running backwards, with a patient developing marked movement side effects on olanzapine after cutting down tobacco [zullino-2002]. the mechanism is the smoke, not the nicotine, so patches do not hold the level down. separately, in 256 people after a first episode of psychosis in south london, continued daily use of high-potency cannabis roughly tripled the odds of relapse, and people who stopped did best; this is the substance acting on the illness, not on the drug [schoeler-2016].
how long to stay on an antipsychotic, in both directions. none of this is olanzapine-specific. a finnish register study of 8,719 people after a first schizophrenia admission found the lowest risk of rehospitalisation or death in those who stayed on an antipsychotic continuously, and death 174% to 214% higher among non-users and early stoppers; people who stop are not a random sample [tiihonen-2018]. a dutch randomised trial of 128 people in remission after a first episode found, seven years on, twice the recovery rate (40.4% against 17.6%) in those assigned to guided dose reduction, with more early relapses along the way; it was small and open-label [wunderink-2013]. the label asks for the need for continued treatment to be reassessed periodically [label 5.6].
questions to ask your prescriber about olanzapine
each one comes from a warning or a study above. they are questions, not instructions; the answers depend on a history nobody here has.
- the label asks for fasting glucose and lipids at the start and periodically, and regular weight checks. when were mine last measured, and what number would change the plan?
- the label says doses above 10 mg were not shown to work better than 10 mg for schizophrenia, and that weight and prolactin rise with dose. if i am above 10 mg, what is the higher dose for in my case?
- i have gained weight since starting. the label’s one-year mean is 5.6 kg and 64% gain 7% or more. what are the options, and what did we weigh against them when this drug was chosen?
- i am a teenager, or my child is. the label says adolescents gain more weight than adults (11.2 kg over about 200 days in its long-term studies) and that this may lead prescribers to consider other drugs first. was that considered?
- i smoke, or i have stopped or am about to stop. the label names non-smoking as a reason for a lower dose, and a study found about twice the blood level per milligram in non-smokers. is a level check or a dose review planned if my smoking changes?
- i take a bladder medicine, an older antihistamine, a tricyclic antidepressant or another anticholinergic drug. the label reports fatalities with that combination since marketing. is anything i take on that list?
- if the injection is being discussed: the label requires a 3-hour observation after every dose and says the risk of the post-injection syndrome accumulates with the number of injections. where would the observation happen, and who takes me home?
- if i am over 65, or someone i care for has dementia: the boxed warning is about deaths in that group, and the label’s own trials found 3.5% against 1.5%. what is the plan for reviewing whether the drug is still needed?
questions people ask
- what does the zyprexa (olanzapine) black box warning mean?
- it has one part: in 17 placebo-controlled trials of antipsychotics in elderly people with dementia-related psychosis, about 4.5% died over roughly ten weeks against about 2.6% on placebo, 1.6 to 1.7 times the rate, mostly from heart or infectious causes. the olanzapine label adds its own figure, 3.5% against 1.5% in the olanzapine trials in that group, and more strokes. olanzapine is not approved for dementia-related psychosis. it does not carry the antidepressant suicidality boxed warning on its own because it is not approved as an antidepressant on its own; the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination does. the long-acting injection carries a second boxed warning of its own, on post-injection delirium and sedation.
- how much weight do people gain on olanzapine?
- on the label’s numbers, a mean 2.6 kg in a median 6 weeks against a 0.3 kg loss on placebo, with 22.2% gaining 7% or more of their body weight against 3%. in studies of at least 48 weeks the mean gain was 5.6 kg, and 64% had gained 7% or more, 32% 15% or more, and 12% a quarter of their weight or more. among people who completed three years, about one in nine had gained more than 20 kg. adolescents gained more: 4.6 kg in 3 weeks and 11.2 kg over about 200 days. a network meta-analysis of 18 antipsychotics ranked olanzapine and clozapine as having the worst metabolic profiles. the label asks for regular weight checks and fasting glucose and lipids at the start and periodically.
- does olanzapine cause diabetes?
- the label says the link between atypical antipsychotics and blood sugar "appears to fall on a continuum and olanzapine appears to have a greater association than some other atypical antipsychotics". its numbers: 2.2% of people with normal fasting glucose crossed the diabetes threshold within 12 weeks (against 3.4% on placebo) and 12.8% did in studies of at least 48 weeks; of people who started borderline, 26.0% crossed it long-term. in the catie trial, glucose rose a mean 15 mg/dl over nine months. the label reports cases of extreme hyperglycemia with ketoacidosis, coma or death across the class, including olanzapine, and asks for fasting glucose at the start and periodically.
- what are the most common olanzapine side effects?
- in the schizophrenia trials: dizziness 11% vs 4% on placebo, constipation 9% vs 3%, weight gain 6% vs 1%, akathisia 5% vs 1%. in the mania trials: somnolence 35% vs 13%, dry mouth 22% vs 7%, dizziness 18% vs 6%. added to lithium or valproate: somnolence 52% vs 27%, dry mouth 32% vs 9%, weight gain 26% vs 7%, increased appetite 24% vs 8%. in adolescents: sedation 44% vs 9%, weight increase 30% vs 6%. orthostatic hypotension was recorded in 20% or more when measured, and prolactin rose from normal to high in 30% of adults and 47% of adolescents. movement side effects on the rating scales were no higher than placebo, and there was no qt signal.
- what is the zyprexa relprevv boxed warning, and why the 3-hour wait?
- the long-acting olanzapine injection carries a boxed warning for post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome: after an injection some people develop signs of olanzapine overdose, from confusion and slurred speech to seizures and coma, apparently because the drug reached the blood faster than intended. the label puts it at fewer than 0.1% of injections and about 2% of patients over up to 46 months, with most hospitalised and all largely recovered within 72 hours; the risk is the same at each injection, so it accumulates. the fda restricts the product to a rems program: certified settings, enrolled prescribers, patients and pharmacies, at least 3 hours of observation after every dose, someone to take the patient home, and no driving that day.
- does smoking change olanzapine levels?
- yes. the hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke induce the liver enzyme cyp1a2 that clears olanzapine. the label names non-smoking status as a reason for a 5 mg starting dose and says carbamazepine, which induces the same enzyme, raises clearance by about half. a study of 73 patients found non-smokers had about twice the blood level per milligram, with seven to twelve cigarettes a day enough for the full effect, and case reports describe side effects appearing when a smoker cuts down. nicotine patches do not reproduce the effect, so a level climbs when smoking stops. that is a question for a prescriber before any change in smoking, not a reason to change the dose alone.
- is olanzapine a controlled substance or addictive?
- it is not a controlled substance. the label says olanzapine "has not been systematically studied in humans for its potential for abuse, tolerance, or physical dependence", that the trials showed no drug-seeking behaviour, and that this is not enough to predict misuse once marketed. a discontinuation reaction (sweating, nausea, vomiting) is among the reactions reported since marketing, which is a separate matter from addiction; the label’s maintenance trials also show the illness returning faster after a switch to placebo. a plan for reducing or stopping belongs with a prescriber.
sources for this section
the library rows link to our one-page summary of each study, with the original paper, its funding and our evidence grade on that page.
- zyprexa (olanzapine) tablets, zydis and intramuscular prescribing information, fda label on dailymed (set id b418946a-1ab4-4d89-a012-d94fc361a3c4, version 68, effective february 11, 2026; h2-pharma under cheplapharm licence): boxed warning; sections 1, 2.1, 2.2, 5.1 to 5.17 with tables 2 to 8, 6.1 tables 9 to 22, 6.2, 7.1, 8.1 to 8.5, 9.3, 10.1, 14.1 to 14.3
- zyprexa relprevv (olanzapine pamoate) extended-release injectable suspension prescribing information, fda label on dailymed (set id 11544cba-64a9-49cb-8d74-da228053b252, version 68, effective may 19, 2026): boxed warning; sections 1.1, 2.1, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.7
- drugs@fda, nda 020592 (zyprexa), approved september 30, 1996
- ahrq medical expenditure panel survey, prescribed medicines public-use files 2014 (hc-168a) to 2024 (hc-254a): olanzapine has no reportable year (fewer than 60 survey respondents in every year, under ahrq’s reliability rule); method on the usage section of this page
- the antipsychotic dementia-mortality warning as a library row: the 17-trial pooled analysis, the 2005 and 2008 fda actions, and the questions it raises (library row)
- huhn m, et al. comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. lancet 2019 (library row written up for aripiprazole) (library row)
- pillinger t, et al. comparative effects of 18 antipsychotics on metabolic function in patients with schizophrenia, predictors of metabolic dysregulation, and association with psychopathology: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. lancet psychiatry 2020 (library row written up for aripiprazole; the olanzapine bmi and ldl figures are from the abstract, pubmed 31860457; uk medical research council and wellcome trust funding) (library row)
- hayes jf, et al. self-harm, unintentional injury, and suicide in bipolar disorder during maintenance mood stabilizer treatment: a uk population-based electronic health records study. jama psychiatry 2016 (library row)
- coupland cac, et al. anticholinergic drug exposure and the risk of dementia: a nested case-control study. jama internal medicine 2019 (library row)
- carbon m, hsieh ch, kane jm, correll cu. tardive dyskinesia prevalence in the period of second-generation antipsychotic use: a meta-analysis. journal of clinical psychiatry 2017 (library row)
- haslemo t, eikeseth ph, tanum l, molden e, refsum h. the effect of variable cigarette consumption on the interaction with clozapine and olanzapine. european journal of clinical pharmacology 2006 (73 patients) (library row)
- zullino df, delessert d, eap cb, preisig m, baumann p. tobacco and cannabis smoking cessation can lead to intoxication with clozapine or olanzapine. international clinical psychopharmacology 2002 (two case reports) (library row)
- schoeler t, et al. effects of continuation, frequency, and type of cannabis use on relapse in the first 2 years after onset of psychosis: an observational study. lancet psychiatry 2016 (256 patients) (library row)
- tiihonen j, tanskanen a, taipale h. 20-year nationwide follow-up study on discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment in first-episode schizophrenia. american journal of psychiatry 2018 (register study; the row records the selection caution) (library row)
- wunderink l, et al. recovery in remitted first-episode psychosis at 7 years of follow-up of an early dose reduction/discontinuation or maintenance treatment strategy: long-term follow-up of a 2-year randomized clinical trial. jama psychiatry 2013 (randomised, open-label, 128 people) (library row)
- what the lurasidone (latuda) warnings mean, the companion explainer on this site, whose label trials used olanzapine as an active comparator
- the olanzapine legal and safety record, a separate page on this site: court and regulator records, kept apart from the label and trial facts here
claims about olanzapine we went and checked
- unverifiabledid aripiprazole have the lowest sedation rate, 4%, of seven antipsychotics in the sino trial?said on Psychopharmacology and Psychiatry Updates, 2026-10-09; the main point holds: in the SINO trial, which randomized 3,067 inpatients to one of seven antipsychotics, the published abstract says aripiprazole was the least sedating, with relative risks of 0.30 to 0.39 against each of the other six drugs. what we could not check is the specific 4% figure, because it is not in the abstract and the full paper was closed to us.
- misattributeddid 67% to 82% of catie patients quit their antipsychotic because it failed or because of side effects?said on Lex Fridman Podcast, 2026-09-20; The trial is real and the scale is close: in the NIMH-funded CATIE trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2005, 74% of patients stopped their first assigned antipsychotic within 18 months. By drug, the rates ran from 64% to 82%, so the top of the speaker's range is exactly right.
- overstateddid the catie trial find the newer antipsychotics no more effective than the older drug?said on Lex Fridman Podcast, 2026-09-20; the core of this is right. in the CATIE trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2005, the older drug perphenazine did about as well as three of the four newer drugs tested (quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone), and the trial's funder, NIMH, summarized it as the newer drugs having "no substantial advantage" over the older one.
- confirmeddoes smoking lower clozapine and olanzapine levels by 30-50%?said on PsychEd: Educational Psychiatry Podcast, 2026-09-01; the speaker is right: tobacco smoke induces cyp1a2, and the main pooled analysis puts the gap at about 30% for olanzapine and about 50% for clozapine. the 30-50% range matches that meta-analysis.
every check quotes one sentence, links the original at the timestamp, and takes each assertion to the primary record. the full list: /checked.
How long the olanzapine trials actually ran
The longest trial behind the olanzapine approval ran 6 weeks.
The gap between how long the trials ran and how long people actually take these medications is the single most important thing on this page. It is not evidence that longer use is unsafe or ineffective. It is evidence that longer use was not what got tested.
People often stay on these drugs for far longer than the trials ran. The short trials behind the approval ran 6 weeks.
That does not mean longer use is unsafe. It does not mean the drug stops working either. It means longer use was never the thing that got tested.
If you have been on it a long time, that is a fair thing to ask your prescriber about.
Boxed warning: increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia
The strongest warning the FDA puts on a label, often called a black box warning. It is reproduced below word for word, not summarised.
This is the strongest warning the FDA can put on a drug label. Some people call it a black box warning. We copied it word for word. We did not shorten it and we did not soften it.
The warning below is about older people with dementia. Older people who have dementia with psychosis are more likely to die if they take antipsychotic drugs. This drug is not approved to treat psychosis caused by dementia.
The FDA’s own words follow, copied exactly.
WARNING: INCREASED MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA-RELATED PSYCHOSIS Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Analyses of seventeen placebo-controlled trials (modal duration of 10 weeks), largely in patients taking atypical antipsychotic drugs, revealed a risk of death in drug-treated patients of between 1.6 to 1.7 times the risk of death in placebo-treated patients. Over the course of a typical 10-week controlled trial, the rate of death in drug-treated patients was about 4.5%, compared to a rate of about 2.6% in the placebo group. Although the causes of death were varied, most of the deaths appeared to be either cardiovascular (e.g., heart failure, sudden death) or infectious (e.g., pneumonia) in nature. Observational studies suggest that, similar to atypical antipsychotic drugs, treatment with conventional antipsychotic drugs may increase mortality. The extent to which the findings of increased mortality in observational studies may be attributed to the antipsychotic drug as opposed to some characteristic(s) of the patients is not clear. ZYPREXA (olanzapine) is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 ), Use in Specific Populations ( 8.5 ), and Patient Counseling Information ( 17 )] . When using ZYPREXA and fluoxetine in combination, also refer to the Boxed Warning section of the package insert for Symbyax. WARNING: INCREASED MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA-RELATED PSYCHOSIS See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. ZYPREXA is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis. ( 5.1 , 8.5 , 17 ) When using ZYPREXA and fluoxetine in combination, also refer to the Boxed Warning section of the package insert for Symbyax.
FDA label effective February 11, 2026 — read the full label on DailyMed
What olanzapine is FDA approved for, and the trials behind it
Approved for treatment of schizophrenia; the 1996 approval covered adults, with the bipolar I disorder and adolescent indications added later in 1996, under application NDA 020592. Source: FDA Drugs@FDA.
The label describes three adult schizophrenia trials behind the oral formulation: two short-term, 6-week controlled trials in hospitalized patients — 149 and 253 patients — against placebo, one of which also carried a haloperidol arm, and a longer-term trial in which 326 outpatients stabilized on olanzapine were randomized to continue it or switch to placebo and observed for relapse. Olanzapine 10 mg/day and above was superior to placebo on symptom scales in the acute trials, and superior to placebo on time to relapse in the longer-term trial.
The FDA approved olanzapine in 1996. The approved use was schizophrenia. The 1996 approval covered adults. Uses in bipolar I disorder and in teens came later. The file number is NDA 020592. The source is Drugs@FDA, the FDA's own database.
The label describes three adult schizophrenia trials behind the pill form.
Two were short 6-week trials against a placebo, in people staying in hospital. They held 149 and 253 patients. One of those also had a haloperidol arm.
The third was longer. 326 outpatients who were stable on the drug were split by chance. Some stayed on it and some moved to a placebo. They were watched to see if they got ill again.
In the short trials, 10 mg a day and above beat the placebo on symptom scales. In the longer trial the drug beat the placebo on how long people went before getting ill again.
- Trials
- 3 trials (two 6-week, one maintenance)
- Duration
- 6 weeks (acute trials)
- Participants
- 149, 253, and 326 patients
- Compared against
- Placebo; haloperidol arm in one trial
The efficacy of oral olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia was established in 2 short-term (6-week) controlled trials of adult inpatients who met DSM III-R criteria for schizophrenia. A single haloperidol arm was included as a comparative treatment in 1 of the 2 trials, but this trial did not compare these 2 drugs on the full range of clinically relevant doses for both.
Verbatim from the olanzapine FDA label, Clinical Studies section, effective February 11, 2026 — read the full label on DailyMed.
Side effects of olanzapine in the approval trials
Incidence among 248 patients on oral olanzapine versus 118 on placebo in the 6-week schizophrenia trials. The label cautions that adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect or predict the rates observed in practice.
Read the limits first. These numbers come from the 6-week schizophrenia trials. 248 people took the drug by mouth and 118 took a placebo.
The label warns that you cannot line these rates up against another drug’s trials. It warns that real life may not match or predict them either.
Weight gain and akathisia on the olanzapine label
The olanzapine FDA label names weight gain and akathisia in its Adverse Reactions section, in the list below.
- Dizziness (11% vs 4% on placebo)
- Constipation (9% vs 3%)
- Personality disorder — the label's term for nonaggressive objectionable behavior (8% vs 4%)
- Weight gain (6% vs 1%)
- Postural hypotension (5% vs 2%)
- Akathisia (5% vs 1%)
Most common adverse reactions (≥5% and at least twice that for placebo) associated with: Oral Olanzapine Monotherapy: Schizophrenia (Adults) – postural hypotension, constipation, weight gain, dizziness, personality disorder, akathisia.
From the olanzapine FDA label, Adverse Reactions section, effective February 11, 2026 — DailyMed.
More from the olanzapine label: drug abuse and dependence
Abuse and dependence not systematically studied
Olanzapine has not been systematically studied in humans for its potential for abuse, tolerance, or physical dependence. The label notes the clinical trials revealed no tendency for drug-seeking behavior, but calls those observations unsystematic, and advises evaluating patients for a history of drug abuse and watching such patients for signs of misuse.
FDA label, Drug Abuse and Dependence section.
How many Americans take olanzapine
Survey-based federal estimates, published with a lag of about two years. They count prescriptions filled, not outcomes.
These are federal survey numbers. They come out about two years late. They count prescriptions filled. They do not tell you if the drug helped.
No year from 2014 to 2024 meets AHRQ’s reliability rule for this drug, so we print no count. Years not shown, under AHRQ’s reliability rule: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 (fewer than 60 survey respondents).
Correction (29 September 2026). An earlier version of this section took its numbers from ClinCalc DrugStats, a third-party site that republishes this survey; we now compute them from AHRQ’s public-use files ourselves. It showed 668,979 people and 3,642,411 prescriptions for 2024. No year meets AHRQ’s reliability rule for this drug, so that count is removed. It said prescriptions were up 51% since 2014; too few years meet the rule to show a trend, so that line is removed.
Source: AHRQ Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Prescribed Medicines public-use files, 2014 (HC-168A) through 2024 (HC-254A), computed by veisund. People with at least one purchase where the Multum generic name (RXDRGNAM) equals the drug, weighted by the year’s person weight; purchases include refills. Standard errors by Taylor linearization on VARSTR/VARPSU. AHRQ’s reliability rule: a year is not shown when fewer than 60 survey respondents reported the drug or the relative standard error is over 50%. AHRQ cautions that its 2018 questionnaire redesign and the 2020–2022 pandemic years make year-to-year comparisons less certain.
What people report to the FDA about olanzapine
Read this before the numbers.
Anyone can file an adverse event report — patients, doctors, manufacturers — and nobody verifies that the drug caused what was reported. There is no denominator: tens of millions of prescriptions generate reports at an unknowable rate, and reporting rises with news coverage, not necessarily with harm. Counts below are report volumes, not rates, and cannot be compared between drugs. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical decisions — we show it because you deserve to see what is in the public record, with its limits stated plainly.
Read this before the numbers.
Anyone can send a report to the FDA. Patients can. Doctors can. Drug makers can. Nobody checks that the drug caused what the report describes.
There is also no bottom number. Tens of millions of prescriptions turn into reports at a rate nobody knows. Reports go up when a drug is in the news, and that is not the same as more harm.
So these are counts of reports. They are not rates. You cannot use them to compare one drug with another. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical choices.
We show it because it is on the public record, and you should get to see it with its limits named.
- 109,181
- reports mentioning olanzapine, all time
- 93,127
- filed as serious (a report-level flag covering every drug and outcome in the report)filed as serious. That flag covers the whole report, and one report can name more than one drug and more than one outcome.
Most-reported reactions
- Drug ineffective7,452
- Weight increased6,931
- Off label use6,256
- Diabetes mellitus5,413
- Drug interaction4,208
- Toxicity to various agents4,207
- Nausea4,139
- Somnolence4,133
- Fatigue3,686
- Anxiety3,517
“Drug ineffective” ranking this high is worth noticing: a report of not being helped counts as an adverse event too, and people file them in large numbers.
It is worth noticing how high “drug ineffective” ranks. A report that the drug did not help counts as an adverse event too. People file a lot of them.
Source: FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), via openFDA, openFDA dataset refreshed 2026-07-30 (the refresh date of the query endpoint, not the date reports run through).
Drug interactions listed on the olanzapine label
The FDA label’s interactions section, verbatim. A pharmacist checking your actual medication list beats any published list — including this one.
Below is the part of the FDA label that lists other drugs. It is copied word for word.
No list on the web can see what else you take. A pharmacist can. Ask one to check your full list.
Read the label’s interactions section
7 DRUG INTERACTIONS The risks of using olanzapine in combination with other drugs have not been extensively evaluated in systematic studies. Diazepam: May potentiate orthostatic hypotension. ( 7.1 , 7.2 ) Alcohol: May potentiate orthostatic hypotension. ( 7.1 ) Carbamazepine: Increased clearance of olanzapine. ( 7.1 ) Fluvoxamine: May increase olanzapine levels. ( 7.1 ) ZYPREXA and Fluoxetine in Combination: Also refer to the Drug Interactions section of the package insert for Symbyax. ( 7.1 ) CNS Acting Drugs: Caution should be used when taken in combination with other centrally acting drugs and alcohol. ( 7.2 ) Antihypertensive Agents: Enhanced antihypertensive effect. ( 7.2 ) Levodopa and Dopamine Agonists: May antagonize levodopa/dopamine agonists. ( 7.2 ) Lorazepam (IM): Increased somnolence with IM olanzapine. ( 7.2 ) Other Concomitant Drug Therapy: When using olanzapine in combination with lithium or valproate, refer to the Drug Interactions sections of the package insert for those products. ( 7.2 )
7.1 Potential for Other Drugs to Affect Olanzapine Diazepam — The co-administration of diazepam with olanzapine potentiated the orthostatic hypotension observed with olanzapine [see Drug Interactions ( 7.2 )] . Cimetidine and Antacids — Single doses of cimetidine (800 mg) or aluminum- and magnesium-containing antacids did not affect the oral bioavailability of olanzapine. Inducers of CYP1A2 — Carbamazepine therapy (200 mg bid) causes an approximately 50% increase in the clearance of olanzapine. This increase is likely due to the fact that carbamazepine is a potent inducer of CYP1A2 activity. Higher daily doses of carbamazepine may cause an even greater increase in olanzapine clearance. Alcohol — Ethanol (45 mg/70 kg single dose) did not have an effect on olanzapine pharmacokinetics. The co-administration of alcohol (i.e., ethanol) with olanzapine potentiated the orthostatic hypotension observed with olanzapine [see Drug Interactions ( 7.2 )] . Inhibitors of CYP1A2 Fluvoxamine: Fluvoxamine, a CYP1A2 inhibitor, decreases the clearance of olanzapine. This results in a mean increase in olanzapine Cmax following fluvoxamine of 54% in female nonsmokers and 77% in male smokers. The mean increase in olanzapine AUC is 52% and 108%, respectively. Lower doses of olanzapine should be considered in patients receiving concomitant treatment with fluvoxamine. Inhibitors of CYP2D6 Fluoxetine: Fluoxetine (60 mg single dose or 60 mg daily dose for 8 days) causes a small (mean 16%) increase in the maximum concentration of olanzapine and a small (mean 16%) decrease in olanzapine clearance. The magnitude of the impact of this factor is small in comparison to the overall variability between individuals, and therefore dose modification is not routinely recommended. When using ZYPREXA and fluoxetine in combination, also refer to the Drug Interactions section of the package insert for Symbyax. Warfarin — Warfarin (20 mg single dose) did not affect olanzapine pharmacokinetics [see Drug Interactions ( 7.2 )] . Inducers of CYP1A2 or Glucuronyl Transferase — Omeprazole and rifampin may cause an increase in olanzapine clearance. Charcoal — The administration of activated charcoal (1 g) reduced the Cmax and AUC of oral olanzapine by about 60%. As peak olanzapine levels are not typically obtained until about 6 hours after dosing, charcoal may be a useful treatment for olanzapine overdose. Anticholinergic Drugs — Concomitant treatment with olanzapine and other drugs with anticholinergic activity can increase the risk for severe gastrointestinal adverse reactions related to hypomotility. ZYPREXA should be used with caution in patients receiving medications having anticholinergic (antimuscarinic) effects [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.14 )] .
7.2 Potential for Olanzapine to Affect Other Drugs CNS Acting Drugs — Given the primary CNS effects of olanzapine, caution should be used when olanzapine is taken in combination with other centrally acting drugs and alcohol. Antihypertensive Agents — Olanzapine, because of its potential for inducing hypotension, may enhance the effects of certain antihypertensive agents. Levodopa and Dopamine Agonists — Olanzapine may antagonize the effects of levodopa and dopamine agonists. Lorazepam (IM) — Administration of intramuscular lorazepam (2 mg) 1 hour after intramuscular olanzapine for injection (5 mg) did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of olanzapine, unconjugated lorazepam, or total lorazepam. However, this co-administration of intramuscular lorazepam and intramuscular olanzapine for injection added to the somnolence observed with either drug alone [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.7 )] . Lithium — Multiple doses of olanzapine (10 mg for 8 days) did not influence the kinetics of lithium. Therefore, concomitant olanzapine administration does not require dosage adjustment of lithium [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.16 )] . Valproate — Olanzapine (10 mg daily for 2 weeks) did not affect the steady state plasma concentrations of valproate. Therefore, concomitant olanzapine administration does not require dosage adjustment of valproate [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.16 )] . Effect of Olanzapine on Drug Metabolizing Enzymes — In vitro studies utilizing human liver microsomes suggest that olanzapine has little potential to inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A. Thus, olanzapine is unlikely to cause clinically important drug interactions mediated by these enzymes. Imipramine — Single doses of olanzapine did not affect the pharmacokinetics of imipramine or its active metabolite desipramine. Warfarin — Single doses of olanzapine did not affect the pharmacokinetics of warfarin [see Drug Interactions ( 7.1 )] . Diazepam — Olanzapine did not influence the pharmacokinetics of diazepam or its active metabolite N-desmethyldiazepam. However, diazepam co-administered with olanzapine increased the orthostatic hypotension observed with either drug given alone [see Drug Interactions ( 7.1 )] . Alcohol — Multiple doses of olanzapine did not influence the kinetics of ethanol [see Drug Interactions ( 7.1 )] . Biperiden — Multiple doses of olanzapine did not influence the kinetics of biperiden. Theophylline — Multiple doses of olanzapine did not affect the pharmacokinetics of theophylline or its metabolites.
FDA label for olanzapine, effective February 11, 2026 — DailyMed.
Label history: when this label changes, it is recorded in What changed.
Who pays for olanzapine
Two claims datasets and one survey, covering different populations with different instruments — they cannot be reconciled by arithmetic, and where their sum crowds the all-payer estimate, that is a finding about the estimates rather than a percentage.
- Medicare Part D
- Read the under-65 group correctly before the numbers: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population — among the sickest, highest-need people in the program — and reading their utilization as typical adult use would be a category error. The beneficiary total sums brand-level rows, so treat it as an upper bound on distinct people. 606,074 beneficiaries filled 3,986,220 claims in 2024 — 367,231 aged 65 and over, and 238,843 under 65.
- Medicaid
- At least 2,622,442 prescriptions in 2024 — a floor, because 405 of 1,561 national data rows are suppressed for privacy and contribute zero. Medicaid covers more children than any insurer in the country and publishes no age split — how much of this number is pediatric use is not knowable from public data.
- All payers (survey estimate)
- No figure. In AHRQ’s MEPS 2024 Prescribed Medicines file, only 44 survey respondents reported it, under the 60 AHRQ requires before it publishes an estimate, so we do not print one.
- The population nobody counts
- The commercially insured working-age adult — statistically, the likeliest person to be reading this page — is the one population with no public per-drug count anywhere. Private claims data exists and is sold, but nothing a patient can check is published. For children the record is thinner still: no public source counts pediatric use of olanzapine specifically; the closest the public record comes is condition-level treatment rates for children, which we have traced for one condition in how childhood ADHD got counted.
Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers — by Geography and Drug, data.cms.gov, National rows, data year 2024 (published with ~17-month lag). Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data 2024, data.medicaid.gov, national aggregate rows. Retrieved 2026-09-01.
Who has been paying for olanzapine, 2019–2024
Medicare Part D
Claims, all ages — the one payer with a public per-drug series.
3,607,325 → 3,986,220 claims
Medicare under 65
Beneficiaries, not ordinary working-age adults: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population. A gap is a suppressed split, not zero.
239,897 → 238,843 beneficiaries
Medicaid
A floor each year — small-cell rows are suppressed federally and excluded from the sum.
2,152,278 → 2,622,442 prescriptions (floor)
Commercially insured adults
No public dataset publishes per-drug commercial claims for any year — the absence is the finding, and it is rendered, not interpolated. The population this library most wants to inform is the one with no public per-drug series, in any year — insurers and PBMs hold that data privately. What the federal surveys do measure — how many adults take these medications at all — is on the adult-usage page.
Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers by Geography and Drug (data.cms.gov, national rows, per data year); Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data (data.medicaid.gov, national rows). Claims, fills and beneficiaries are different units — compare each series only with itself.
The olanzapine approval, step by step
Step 1
What the approval was actually based on
Which studies did the FDA rely on, how long did they run, and who was in them?
The efficacy of oral olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia was established in 2 short-term (6-week) controlled trials of adult inpatients who met DSM III-R criteria for schizophrenia. A single haloperidol arm was included as a comparative treatment in 1 of the 2 trials, but this trial did not compare these 2 drugs on the full range of clinically relevant doses for both.
FDA-approved labelling, 14 CLINICAL STUDIES 14.1 Schizophrenia — read the label on DailyMed
Our reading
Two six-week trials — the thinnest approval package of the antipsychotics here — and the label itself flags that the one head-to-head comparison did not test both drugs across their real dose ranges, so it cannot tell you olanzapine is better than the older drug it was priced against. Olanzapine causes more weight gain and more metabolic disturbance than almost anything else in psychiatry, and six weeks is not long enough to see it. Note also that the application is now held by Cheplapharm; the trials were Lilly's.
Step 2
The approval
When was it approved, under what application, and by whose review?
- Approved
- September 30, 1996
- Application
- NDA020592
- Review
- STANDARD
- Original sponsor
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Holds it now
- Cheplapharm
- Label submissions since
- 48
Source: openFDA Drugs@FDA, original application ORIG-1
Step 3
What was added after it was on the market
Which warnings arrived only after millions of people were already taking it?
Antipsychotics raise the risk of death in older people with dementia
This is one of the clearest harm signals in psychiatric medicine, and it applies to a specific group: older adults with dementia-related psychosis. Pooling 17 placebo-controlled trials covering 5,106 patients over roughly 10 weeks, the risk of death was 1.6 to 1.7 times higher on an antipsychotic than on placebo — about 4.5% against 2.6%. Most deaths were cardiovascular or infectious, chiefly heart failure, sudden death and pneumonia.
The FDA first applied this warning to the newer antipsychotics in 2005 and extended it to the older ones in 2008. No antipsychotic is approved for dementia-related psychosis.
If this is being prescribed for an older relative with dementia, worth asking: what specific behaviour are we treating, what have we tried that is not a drug, what is the shortest time we can plan for, and when will we review stopping.
Step 4
What independent research has found since
What has been learned by people who were not selling it?
After a first psychotic episode, daily high-potency cannabis tripled the odds of relapse; quitting gave the best course
20 years after approval
"Can I keep smoking weed on my antipsychotic" is the question, and the answer in this study depends on how much, how strong, and whether you stop.
Significant findings
Schoeler and colleagues (Lancet Psychiatry, 2016) followed patients aged 18 to 65 who presented with a first episode of psychosis in south London between 2002 and 2013, with follow-up to 2015; 256 patients. Relapse meant admission to hospital within two years.
"Simple analyses showed that former regular users of cannabis who stopped after the onset of psychosis had the most favourable illness course with regards to relapse. In multiple analysis, continued high-frequency users (ie, daily use in all 24 months) of high-potency (skunk-like) cannabis had the worst outcome, indexed as an increased risk for a subsequent relapse (odds ratio [OR] 3.28; 95% CI 1.22-9.18), more relapses (incidence rate ratio 1.77; 95% CI 0.96-3.25), fewer months until a relapse occurred (b -0.22; 95% CI -0.40 to -0.04), and more intense psychiatric care (OR 3.16; 95% CI 1.26-8.09) after the onset of psychosis."
A companion analysis by the same group in JAMA Psychiatry the same year, 220 patients with fixed-effects models adjusting for antipsychotic adherence and other drug use, found relapse odds rose during periods of cannabis use relative to periods without (odds ratio 1.13 per period), with cross-lagged analysis pointing from cannabis use to later relapse rather than the reverse.
Worth asking
This is not a drug-drug interaction in the enzyme sense; it is the substance acting on the illness the medication is treating, and the direction held after adjusting for whether people took their antipsychotic. Two things the data support: the dose and potency mattered, and the people who stopped did best. If you have had a psychotic episode and use cannabis, the question for the treating team is not a yes or no but what your pattern is and what the alternative to daily high-potency use would look like.
Years of stacked anticholinergic drugs, including some antidepressants and antipsychotics, were linked to dementia
23 years after approval
Some interactions are not between two named drugs but between a property several of them share. Anticholinergic burden is the clearest example in psychiatry: tricyclic antidepressants, some antipsychotics, bladder drugs and older antihistamines all block the same receptor, and the effects add.
Significant findings
Coupland and colleagues (JAMA Internal Medicine, 2019) ran a nested case-control study in English general practice records: "58 769 patients with a diagnosis of dementia and 225 574 controls 55 years or older matched by age, sex, general practice, and calendar time." Exposure was the cumulative prescribed dose of 56 strongly anticholinergic drugs in the 1 to 11 years before diagnosis.
"The adjusted OR for dementia increased from 1.06 (95% CI, 1.03-1.09) in the lowest overall anticholinergic exposure category (total exposure of 1-90 TSDDs) to 1.49 (95% CI, 1.44-1.54) in the highest category (>1095 TSDDs), compared with no anticholinergic drug prescriptions in the 1 to 11 years before the index date."
By class, at the highest exposure: "anticholinergic antidepressants (adjusted OR [AOR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.24-1.34), antiparkinson drugs (AOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16-2.00), antipsychotics (AOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.53-1.90), bladder antimuscarinic drugs (AOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.56-1.75), and antiepileptic drugs (AOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.22-1.57)". "Associations were stronger in cases diagnosed before the age of 80 years. The population-attributable fraction associated with total anticholinergic drug exposure during the 1 to 11 years before diagnosis was 10.3%."
Worth asking
A case-control study cannot rule out that early, undiagnosed dementia leads to these prescriptions rather than the reverse, though the authors tested windows starting 3 and 5 years before diagnosis and the association held. What the study supports is a question, not a decision: how many of your medications are strongly anticholinergic, and is the total something anyone has added up? A pharmacist can score it. The clozapine label in this wave carries the short-term version of the same warning, anticholinergic toxicity when such drugs are combined.
Non-smokers had twice the clozapine and olanzapine level per milligram; seven cigarettes a day gave the full effect
10 years after approval
The clozapine label says tobacco smoke lowers the level. This is a measurement of how much, in patients living ordinary lives rather than volunteers.
Significant findings
Haslemo and colleagues (European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2006) recorded smoking habits, doses and serum concentrations in 73 patients with schizophrenia in psychiatric nursing homes: 33 on clozapine and 40 on olanzapine. "Fifty-nine patients (80%) were smokers".
"While the mean ratio was twice as high in non-smokers compared to smokers for both drugs (p<0.01), the C/D ratios of clozapine and olanzapine were not significantly different between the subgroups of smokers (p >0.15). Absolute serum concentrations were also higher in non-smokers compared to smokers: 50% for clozapine (p=0.058) and 67% for olanzapine (p<0.01)."
The practical conclusions: "A daily consumption of 7-12 cigarettes is probably sufficient for maximum induction of clozapine and olanzapine metabolism. A 50% lower starting dose of both drugs in non-smokers seems rational to avoid side effects."
Worth asking
The mechanism is the tar, not the nicotine: the hydrocarbons in smoke induce the liver enzyme CYP1A2, so nicotine patches and gum do not keep the level down when someone quits. That means the interaction runs backwards when a person on clozapine or olanzapine stops smoking, and the level can roughly double over a week or two. If that is you, the question is whether a blood level is booked and whether the dose will be reviewed rather than left where it was when you smoked.
A clozapine patient became confused after quitting tobacco and cannabis: the smoke had been holding his level down
6 years after approval
Cannabis is usually smoked, and smoke of any kind changes how the body handles two of the most used antipsychotics. This report is the interaction running backwards, when the smoking stops.
Significant findings
Zullino and colleagues (International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2002): "Plasma levels of clozapine and olanzapine are lower in smokers than in nonsmokers, which is mainly due to induction of cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) by some smoke constituents. Smoking cessation in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs that are CYP1A2 substrates may result in increased plasma levels of the drug and, consequently, in adverse drug effects."
"Two cases of patients who smoked tobacco and cannabis are reported. The first patient, who was receiving clozapine treatment, developed confusion after tobacco and cannabis smoking cessation, which was related to increased clozapine plasma levels. The second patient, who was receiving olanzapine treatment, showed important extrapyramidal motor symptoms after reducing his tobacco consumption."
The clinical rule they draw: "smoking patients treated with CYP1A2 substrate antipsychotics should regularly be monitored with regard to their smoking consumption in order to adjust doses in cases of a reduction or increase in smoking."
Worth asking
The clozapine label and the Haslemo 2006 study in the interactions wave give the size of the tobacco effect: roughly double the level per milligram in non-smokers. Cannabis smoke contains the same enzyme-inducing hydrocarbons, so a person who smokes cannabis heavily and then stops, or is admitted somewhere they cannot, may see their clozapine or olanzapine level climb over a week or two. The question for a prescriber is whether a level is checked whenever smoking of any kind changes, and the question for the patient is to say so when it does.
Step 5
What still is not known
Which questions you might reasonably have has nobody answered yet?
- Two trials, six weeks. This is the shortest and smallest antipsychotic package in the directory.
- The label says the haloperidol comparison did not cover the full dose range of either drug. So on what basis is it the better choice?
- Metabolic effects are the main reason people stop taking it, and they were not measurable inside six weeks.
The olanzapine legal and safety record
Settled and adjudicated matters only, from primary sources — including the litigation that was decided for the manufacturer, and the cases this drug is verifiably not part of.
Deciding about olanzapine?
- Side-effect rates from olanzapine's own label — drug vs placebo, with every caveat the label attaches
- How long every medication's approval trials ran — olanzapine beside every other drug in the library, from the same FDA record
- 12 questions to ask before starting a psychiatric medication — each with the study behind it
- Already on it? The 10-question annual review — including the honest case for staying
- How long every drug here was tested before approval — one chart, all medications
Open olanzapine (Zyprexa) in veisund
The app has the full approval journey, the resources behind it, and people working through the same questions.
