Medication approval journey

quetiapine (Seroquel)

Approved for Schizophrenia

page first published · last updated

Also answers to “the heavy blanket” — its codename in our videos and posts. The full codebook

FDA approvedAntipsychoticTaper risk: high

How this page reads

The page as written, with the clinical terms

Plain language uses the same facts, the same numbers and the same caveats. It does not leave anything out. Quotes from the FDA label are never reworded in either setting.

Before you stop or change your quetiapine dose

Stopping abruptly can be dangerous — never do it without medical supervision

Do not stop an antipsychotic abruptly. Abrupt withdrawal can cause rebound or supersensitivity psychosis and withdrawal movement disorders, and relapse risk is highest with the fastest reductions. Any change should be a slow, prescriber-supervised taper.

what the quetiapine warnings mean

label facts below are read from the quetiapine tablets FDA label on DailyMed, set id 711f42c5-0719-46de-81fb-3d03801b9ed9, version 3, effective august 25, 2026, the version the dossier above cites. the section numbers in brackets are the label’s own. every source is linked at the end of this section. last checked 2026-10-06.

quetiapine was approved on september 26, 1997 for schizophrenia, and later for manic and depressive episodes of bipolar disorder and for bipolar maintenance as an add-on to lithium or divalproex [label 1; approval]. about 1.8 million americans filled a prescription for it in 2024, up from about 1.7 million in 2014 [meps]. it is not a controlled substance [label 9.1]. its label opens with a two-part boxed warning, one on deaths among older people with dementia and one on suicidal thoughts in young people, and then runs through twenty numbered warnings, the longest of which is the metabolic one, with the label’s own tables for weight, blood sugar and lipids. this section says what each means in plain words, what the approval trials measured and for how long, which side effects the label counts and how often, and what independent research has found since, in both directions, including on the low-dose use for sleep that is not an approved use. every number is from the label or from a study linked at the end.

the legal and safety record for this drug has its own page on this site and is not repeated here [legal-record]. this is information to take to a prescriber. nothing here is a reason to start, stop or change a dose on your own; the label itself describes withdrawal symptoms after abrupt stopping and advises gradual withdrawal.

the boxed warning, part one: deaths among older people with dementia-related psychosis

the first part of the boxed warning says that elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death, and that quetiapine is not approved for them [label, boxed warning and 5.1]. the number behind it is a pooled analysis of 17 placebo-controlled trials, mostly of atypical antipsychotics and mostly about 10 weeks long: the death rate was about 4.5% on drug against about 2.6% on placebo, 1.6 to 1.7 times higher. most of the deaths were cardiovascular, such as heart failure or sudden death, or infectious, such as pneumonia [label 5.1].

two things about it are easy to miss. it is a class warning, written from trials of several antipsychotics rather than of quetiapine alone, and the label adds that observational studies suggest the older, conventional antipsychotics may carry the same risk [label 5.1]. and it is specific to one population: older people with psychosis caused by dementia, a group the drug was never approved for. a related warning notes that in trials of risperidone, aripiprazole and olanzapine in elderly people with dementia there were more strokes and transient ischaemic attacks, including fatal ones, than on placebo [label 5.3].

the boxed warning, part two: suicidal thoughts and behaviors, by age

the second part is the antidepressant class warning, which quetiapine carries because it is approved for bipolar depression. it says antidepressants increased the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior in children, adolescents and young adults in short-term studies, and that everyone started on one should be watched closely for worsening, especially in the first months and after a dose change [label, boxed warning and 5.2]. the label states the difference against placebo per 1,000 people treated: under 18, 14 additional people with suicidal thoughts or behaviors; 18 to 24, 5 additional; 25 to 64, 1 fewer; 65 and older, 6 fewer [label 5.2, table 2]. the pooled trials were of antidepressants generally, 24 pediatric trials of 9 drugs in more than 4,400 patients and 295 adult trials of 11 drugs in more than 77,000, not of quetiapine specifically. no suicides occurred in the pediatric trials; the adult trials had too few to conclude anything about suicide itself [label 5.2].

the label adds two instructions. because a depressive episode can be the first sign of bipolar disorder, anyone with depressive symptoms should be screened for bipolar risk before starting, with a family history of suicide, bipolar disorder and depression [label 5.2]. and prescriptions should be written for the smallest quantity of tablets consistent with good management, to reduce the risk of overdose [label 5.2]. quetiapine is not approved for anyone under ten [label, boxed warning].

the metabolic warning, with the label’s tables

warning 5.5 is the one most people on this drug will live with. the label says atypical antipsychotics as a class cause hyperglycemia and diabetes, undesirable lipid changes and weight gain, that each drug has its own profile, and that in some patients more than one of the three worsened at once. it asks for fasting glucose testing at the start and periodically in anyone with diabetes risk factors, fasting lipid testing at the start and periodically, and regular weight monitoring [label 5.5]. the tables are below, as the label prints them.

  • weight, adults [5.5, table 1]: the share gaining 7% or more of body weight was 23% against 6% on placebo in the schizophrenia trials (up to 6 weeks; 391 against 206 people), 21% against 7% in the 12-week bipolar mania monotherapy trials, 13% against 4% in the 3-week adjunct trials, and 8% against 2% in the 8-week bipolar depression trials (554 against 295).
  • weight, children and adolescents [5.5, table 2]: 21% against 7% gained 7% or more in the 6-week schizophrenia trial (mean 2.0 kg against a loss of 0.4 kg) and 12% against 0% in the 3-week mania trial (1.7 kg against 0.4 kg). in the open-label extension that followed, 241 of 380 completed 26 weeks; mean weight gain was 4.4 kg, 45% had gained 7% or more, and after adjusting for normal growth 18.3% met the label’s threshold for a clinically significant rise in body-mass index.
  • blood sugar, adults [5.5, table 3]: in placebo-controlled trials up to 12 weeks, 2.4% of people who started with a normal fasting glucose crossed the diabetes threshold of 126 mg/dl, against 1.4% on placebo (2,907 against 1,346). in the two long-term bipolar maintenance trials, mean fasting glucose rose 5.0 mg/dl on quetiapine over an average 213 days and fell 0.05 mg/dl on placebo; the exposure-adjusted rate of a reading at or above 126 mg/dl was 18.0 per 100 patient-years against 9.5. the label is candid that the relationship between these drugs and diabetes "is not completely understood" and that precise risk estimates are not available.
  • lipids, adults [5.5, table 4]: total cholesterol crossed 240 mg/dl in 18% against 7% in the 6-week schizophrenia trials and 9% against 6% in the 8-week bipolar depression trials; triglycerides crossed 200 mg/dl in 22% against 16% and 14% against 9%; ldl crossed 160 mg/dl in 6% against 5% (bipolar depression only; the schizophrenia registration trials did not measure it); hdl fell to 40 mg/dl or below in 14% on each arm.
  • lipids, children and adolescents [5.5, table 5]: total cholesterol crossed 200 mg/dl in 12% against 2% (schizophrenia, 6 weeks) and 10% against 3% (mania, 3 weeks); triglycerides crossed 150 mg/dl in 17% against 8% and 22% against 13%.
  • what the tables cannot show: they stop at 3 to 12 weeks for most indications, and the maintenance trials ran a median of about seven months. the one-year and ten-year numbers are in the research section below.

the other warnings, in plain words

the warnings section runs from 5.1 to 5.20; the newest, on prolactin, was revised in january 2025 [label, recent major changes]. beyond the boxed warnings and the metabolic one:

  • neuroleptic malignant syndrome [5.4]: a rare, potentially fatal reaction to antipsychotics, with very high temperature, rigid muscles, confusion and unstable pulse or blood pressure. the label says stop the drug at once and treat in hospital. rare cases have been reported with quetiapine.
  • tardive dyskinesia [5.6]: involuntary, potentially irreversible movements, most often after long treatment and high cumulative doses but sometimes after brief low-dose treatment or after stopping. the label says chronic antipsychotic treatment should be reserved for chronic illness with no equally effective, less harmful alternative, at the smallest dose and shortest duration that works, with the need reassessed periodically.
  • low blood pressure and fainting [5.7] and falls [5.8]: orthostatic hypotension, especially during the first days of dose increase; fainting in 1% of patients (28 of 3,265) against 0.2% on placebo. the label asks for a fall-risk assessment in anyone with conditions or medicines that add to drowsiness or unsteadiness.
  • raised blood pressure in children and adolescents [5.9]: a systolic rise of 20 mmhg or more in 15.2% against 5.5% on placebo and a diastolic rise of 10 mmhg or more in 40.6% against 24.5%. blood pressure is to be measured at the start and periodically. this did not occur in adults.
  • low white cells [5.10]: leukopenia, neutropenia and agranulocytosis, including fatal cases and cases with no risk factor. a neutrophil count below 1.0 occurred in 0.3% against 0.1% on placebo [6.1]. anyone with a low white count or a history of drug-induced neutropenia needs frequent blood counts in the first months.
  • cataracts [5.11]: lens changes seen in chronic dog studies and in people on long-term treatment, cause not established. the label recommends a lens examination at the start of treatment and every six months during chronic treatment.
  • heart rhythm [5.12]: no persistent qt lengthening in the trials, but the label says the effect was never measured in a thorough qt study, that qt prolongation has been reported in overdose, and that quetiapine should be avoided with other qt-prolonging drugs (it names several antiarrhythmics, antipsychotics, antibiotics and methadone) and in people with low potassium or magnesium or a slow heart rate.
  • seizures [5.13]: 0.5% of patients (20 of 3,490) against 0.2% on placebo.
  • thyroid [5.14]: dose-related falls in thyroxine of about 20% at the high end of the dose range, mostly reversing when the drug stops; tsh rose above 5 in 3.2% against 2.7% on placebo overall and in 12% against 7% when added to lithium or divalproex. the label asks for tsh and free t4 at baseline and follow-up, and some patients needed thyroid replacement.
  • prolactin [5.15, revised january 2025]: a clinically significant shift in 3.6% of adults against 2.6% on placebo; in children and adolescents, 13.4% against 4% of boys and 8.7% against 0% of girls. high prolactin can suppress reproductive hormones, cause milk production, missed periods, breast enlargement in men and impotence, and over years lower bone density.
  • drowsiness and impaired thinking [5.16]: somnolence in 18% against 11% in schizophrenia trials, 16% against 4% in mania monotherapy, 34% against 9% as an adjunct, and 57% against 15% in bipolar depression. the label says not to drive or operate machinery until the effect is known, and that somnolence may lead to falls.
  • heat [5.17], swallowing [5.18]: antipsychotics can impair the body’s cooling and have been linked to aspiration pneumonia, a common cause of death in older people with advanced dementia.
  • stopping [5.19]: insomnia, nausea and vomiting after abrupt cessation; in the extended-release trials 12.1% had at least one discontinuation symptom against 6.7% on placebo, usually resolving within a week. "gradual withdrawal is advised."
  • anticholinergic effects [5.20]: quetiapine’s active metabolite norquetiapine blocks muscarinic receptors, which adds to dry mouth, constipation and urinary retention, and the label reports intestinal obstruction, including fatal cases in people on several motility-slowing drugs. caution with other anticholinergic medicines.
  • interactions and food [2.5, 2.6, 7.1]: quetiapine is cleared by the liver enzyme cyp3a4. with a strong inhibitor (ketoconazole, itraconazole, ritonavir, nefazodone) the label says the dose should be cut to one sixth; with a strong inducer taken for more than a week or two (phenytoin, carbamazepine, rifampin, st john’s wort) raised up to fivefold. grapefruit disables the same enzyme in the gut wall, and a review of grapefruit interactions lists quetiapine among the drugs affected [grapefruit]. the label also warns of false positives on urine screens for methadone and tricyclics [6.1].

the low-dose use for sleep: not an approved use, and what the studies found

quetiapine has no approved indication for insomnia, anxiety or any sleep problem [label 1]. the only places sleepiness appears in the label are the side-effect tables and warning 5.16, where it is the most common adverse reaction, at 57% of people on 300 mg for bipolar depression [label 5.16; 6.1, table 11]. a prescription for sleep at 25 to 100 mg is off-label: legal for a prescriber to write, but written without a trial the fda has reviewed for that purpose.

what the trials say. a 2016 systematic review of atypical antipsychotics for insomnia found a single randomised trial of quetiapine for primary insomnia, in 13 people, with no significant improvement in sleep time, time to fall asleep or sleep satisfaction against placebo [thompson-2016]. for generalized anxiety the evidence is stronger: a cochrane review of 11 trials in more than 4,000 people found people about twice as likely to respond to quetiapine as to placebo, with more weight gain, more sedation and more dropouts from side effects, and the reviewers noted the use is not approved [depping-2010].

what low doses do to the body. the usual argument for low-dose use is that the metabolic effects belong to antipsychotic doses. a danish registry study tested that in 106,711 people who started quetiapine at 50 mg or less between 2008 and 2018 and had blood tests the year before and the year after. across everyone, triglycerides rose about 5% and hdl fell about 2%; among people whose results were normal at the start, hba1c, total cholesterol and ldl all rose, and the effect grew with dose, which argues against low doses being metabolically free [hojlund-2023]. the same group compared 60,566 low-dose quetiapine users with 454,567 users of z-drug sleeping tablets over 890,198 person-years: low-dose quetiapine went with a 13% higher rate of heart attack, stroke or cardiovascular death on intention-to-treat analysis and 52% higher among people who stayed on it, with cardiovascular death 26% and 90% higher respectively, and the excess was larger in women and in people over 65; against ssris the excess was 42%. the authors wrote that off-label low-dose use for sedation "should be discouraged" [hojlund-2022]. both are observational: people prescribed quetiapine for sleep may differ from people prescribed a z-drug in ways the records cannot fully adjust for.

what the approval trials measured, and for how long

schizophrenia rests on three 6-week trials of inpatients. one gave five fixed doses to 361 people: the four highest beat placebo on the brief psychiatric rating scale, the effect was maximal at 300 mg a day, and 150 to 750 mg were "generally indistinguishable". one titrated 286 people high or low: only the high-dose group, averaging 500 mg, beat placebo. the third, in 618 people, compared 450 mg with 50 mg and had no placebo arm. one trial carried a single fixed-dose haloperidol arm that the label itself calls inadequate for a valid comparison [label 14.1]. a 6-week trial in 222 adolescents aged 13 to 17 added 400 and 800 mg arms, each beating placebo by 8 to 9 points on the positive and negative syndrome scale [label 14.1, table 19]. the label states that "the effectiveness of quetiapine tablets for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia has not been systematically evaluated in controlled clinical trials" [label 1.1].

mania rests on two 12-week monotherapy trials (300 and 299 people) and one 3-week add-on trial (170 people). the placebo-subtracted change on the young mania rating scale was 4.0 and 7.9 points in the monotherapy trials and 3.8 points as an add-on; in the same trials haloperidol and lithium, included as comparators, scored 7.4 and 8.5 [label 14.2, table 3]. a second add-on trial of 200 people did not beat placebo, "possibly due to a higher placebo effect" [label 14.2]. a 3-week trial in children and adolescents aged 10 to 17 beat placebo at 400 and 600 mg.

bipolar depression rests on two identical 8-week trials in 1,045 people with bipolar i or ii at fixed doses of 300 or 600 mg. quetiapine beat placebo by 4 to 6.5 points on the montgomery-asberg scale from the first week, and "no additional benefit was seen with the 600 mg dose" [label 14.2, table 4]. the first of these, in 542 people, reported about 58% responding against 36% on placebo [calabrese-2005]. maintenance as an add-on rests on two randomised-withdrawal trials in 1,326 people who were already stable on quetiapine plus lithium or divalproex for an average of 15 weeks before being randomised to continue or switch to placebo; half of the quetiapine group had dropped out by day 280 and half of the placebo group by day 117 [label 14.2]. monotherapy maintenance has not been evaluated in controlled trials [label 1.2].

side effects, with the label’s numbers

in the 3- to 12-week schizophrenia and mania monotherapy trials (719 against 404 on placebo): headache 21% against 14%, agitation 20% against 17%, somnolence 18% against 8%, dizziness 11% against 5%, dry mouth 9% against 3%, constipation 8% against 3%, weight gain 5% against 1%, raised alt (a liver enzyme) 5% against 1%, dyspepsia 5% against 1%, postural hypotension 4% against 1% [label 6.1, table 9]. alt rose above three times the normal limit in about 6% against 1% in the schizophrenia trials, usually in the first three weeks and usually reversing during treatment [label 6.1].

in the 8-week bipolar depression trials (698 against 347): somnolence 57% against 15%, dry mouth 44% against 13%, dizziness 18% against 7%, constipation 10% against 4%, fatigue 10% against 8%, increased appetite 5% against 3%, lethargy 5% against 2%, akathisia 4% against 1%, weight increase 4% against 1%, extrapyramidal disorder 3% against 1% [label 6.1, table 11]. dropouts for side effects were 12.3% at 300 mg and 19.0% at 600 mg against 5.2% on placebo [label 6.1].

in children and adolescents with mania (3 weeks, 400 or 600 mg): somnolence 50% to 57% against 14%, dizziness 17% to 19% against 2%, increased appetite 9% to 10% against 1%, weight increase 6% against 0% [label 6.1, table 14]. on movement side effects the label is favourable: in the five-dose schizophrenia trial, parkinsonism, akathisia and dystonia were no more common on any dose than on placebo [label 6.1, table 12], which is consistent with the network meta-analysis below. in overdose, survival has been reported up to 30 grams, and one death followed 13.6 grams taken alone [label 10.1].

what the research says, in both directions

in favour. in a network meta-analysis of 402 randomised trials covering 53,463 adults with schizophrenia, quetiapine ranked mid-field of 32 antipsychotics for symptom reduction, with among the lowest rates of movement side effects, more sedation, and a small qtc prolongation of about 3 milliseconds against placebo [huhn-2019]. in bipolar depression it is one of few drugs with placebo-controlled evidence, and 300 mg did as well as 600 mg [calabrese-2005; label 14.2]. for generalized anxiety, an unapproved use, response was about twice placebo in a cochrane review [depping-2010].

against, or smaller than it sounds. in a swedish cohort of 29,823 people with schizophrenia followed up to 7.5 years and compared each with themselves on and off treatment, oral quetiapine had the highest rehospitalisation risk of the commonly used antipsychotics, barely better than no antipsychotic at all (hazard ratio 0.91), while clozapine and long-acting injections roughly halved the risk; several authors had industry ties and the sponsor’s product ranked first [tiihonen-2017; tiihonen-2017-plain]. in a finnish cohort of 18,018 people with bipolar disorder, quetiapine was the most prescribed drug and lowered the risk of rehospitalisation by less than a tenth, where lithium lowered it by about a third [lahteenvuo-2018]. in 6,671 uk patients on maintenance treatment, self-harm rates were roughly 40% to 50% higher on quetiapine, valproate or olanzapine than on lithium, with the usual caution that people prescribed different drugs differ [hayes-2016]. an english case-control study of 58,769 people with dementia found the highest cumulative exposure to strongly anticholinergic drugs, a group that includes some antipsychotics, associated with about 49% higher odds of dementia, 70% for the antipsychotic class; early dementia leading to prescriptions is the standard alternative explanation [coupland-2019].

the warnings, measured. the metabolic warning’s long-term size is in the danish studies above: measurable lipid and glucose shifts within a year at 50 mg or less, rising with dose [hojlund-2023], and a 13% to 52% higher rate of major cardiovascular events at low doses against sleeping tablets [hojlund-2022]. the label’s own tables show the first 3 to 12 weeks [label 5.5]. the boxed dementia warning’s size is the label’s: about two extra deaths per hundred people over ten weeks [label 5.1].

questions to ask your prescriber about quetiapine

each one comes from a warning or a study above. they are questions, not instructions; the answers depend on a history nobody here has.

  • what am i taking this for, and is that one of the label’s approved uses? if it is for sleep or anxiety, what did we weigh against the metabolic and cardiovascular findings at low doses?
  • the label asks for fasting glucose, fasting lipids and weight at the start and periodically. when were mine last measured, and what number would change the plan?
  • in the bipolar depression trials, 300 mg did as well as 600 mg and had fewer dropouts. if i am above 300 mg for depression, what is the higher dose for?
  • the label recommends a lens examination at the start and every six months during long-term treatment, and tsh and free t4 at baseline and follow-up. are those happening?
  • i take an antifungal, an hiv medicine, carbamazepine, phenytoin, st john’s wort, or i eat grapefruit. the label says these change quetiapine levels up to sixfold. is anything i take on that list?
  • if i am over 65, or someone i care for has dementia: the boxed warning is about deaths in that group. what is the plan for reviewing whether the drug is still needed?
  • the label says stopping abruptly can cause insomnia, nausea and vomiting and advises gradual withdrawal. if we ever reduce or stop, what would the schedule be?

questions people ask

what does the seroquel (quetiapine) black box warning mean?
it has two parts. first, in 17 placebo-controlled trials of antipsychotics in elderly people with dementia-related psychosis, about 4.5% died over roughly ten weeks against about 2.6% on placebo, 1.6 to 1.7 times the rate, mostly from heart or infectious causes; quetiapine is not approved for that group. second, antidepressants increased suicidal thoughts and behavior in people under 25 in short-term trials (14 extra cases per 1,000 under 18, 5 extra at 18 to 24, 1 fewer at 25 to 64, 6 fewer at 65 and over), and quetiapine carries that warning because it is approved for bipolar depression. neither part is an instruction to stop the drug; both describe who should be watched, and for what.
is quetiapine approved for sleep?
no. quetiapine is approved for schizophrenia, bipolar mania, bipolar depression and bipolar maintenance as an add-on. a prescription for insomnia or anxiety is off-label, which is legal but means the fda has not reviewed a trial for that use. the only randomised trial of quetiapine for primary insomnia found by a 2016 systematic review had 13 people and found no significant improvement in sleep. two danish registry studies of people on 50 mg or less found measurable rises in blood sugar and cholesterol within a year, growing with dose, and a 13% to 52% higher rate of heart attack, stroke or cardiovascular death than in people on z-drug sleeping tablets. for generalized anxiety, also unapproved, a cochrane review found response about twice placebo, with more weight gain and sedation.
how much weight do people gain on quetiapine?
in the label’s adult trials, 23% gained 7% or more of their body weight in 6 weeks against 6% on placebo in schizophrenia, 21% against 7% over 12 weeks in mania, and 8% against 2% over 8 weeks in bipolar depression. in children and adolescents, mean gain was 2.0 kg over 6 weeks against a loss of 0.4 kg, and in the open-label extension the mean gain at 26 weeks was 4.4 kg, with 45% gaining 7% or more. the label asks for regular weight checks and fasting glucose and lipids at the start and periodically. the registry study of low doses found lipid and blood sugar shifts even at 50 mg or less.
what are the most common quetiapine side effects?
in the schizophrenia and mania trials: headache 21% vs 14% on placebo, somnolence 18% vs 8%, dizziness 11% vs 5%, dry mouth 9% vs 3%, constipation 8% vs 3%, weight gain 5% vs 1%, raised liver enzymes 5% vs 1%. in the bipolar depression trials at 300 to 600 mg: somnolence 57% vs 15%, dry mouth 44% vs 13%, dizziness 18% vs 7%, constipation 10% vs 4%. in children with mania, somnolence was 50% to 57% vs 14%. movement side effects were no more common than placebo in the fixed-dose schizophrenia trial, which is the drug’s main advantage in the network meta-analysis.
what happens if you stop quetiapine suddenly?
the label says insomnia, nausea and vomiting have been described after abrupt cessation of atypical antipsychotics including quetiapine; in the extended-release trials, 12.1% had at least one discontinuation symptom against 6.7% on placebo, usually resolving within a week. it says "gradual withdrawal is advised." separately, the illness the drug was treating can return: in the maintenance trials, half of the people switched to placebo had left the trial by day 117, against day 280 for those kept on quetiapine. a plan for reducing or stopping belongs with a prescriber.
is seroquel (quetiapine) a controlled substance or addictive?
it is not a controlled substance. the label says quetiapine "has not been systematically studied, in animals or humans, for its potential for abuse, tolerance, or physical dependence", that the trials showed no drug-seeking behaviour, and that this is not enough to predict misuse once marketed, so people with a history of drug misuse should be watched for tolerance, dose escalation and drug-seeking. the discontinuation symptoms above are a separate matter from addiction.

sources for this section

the library rows link to our one-page summary of each study, with the original paper, its funding and our evidence grade on that page.

  1. quetiapine tablets prescribing information, fda label on dailymed (set id 711f42c5-0719-46de-81fb-3d03801b9ed9, version 3, effective august 25, 2026; lupin, repackaged by preferred pharmaceuticals): boxed warning; sections 1, 2.5, 2.6, 5.1 to 5.20 with tables 1 to 5 and 8, 6.1 tables 9 to 14, 7.1, 9.1, 9.2, 10.1, 14.1 and 14.2 with tables 19, 3 and 4, recent major changes
  2. drugs@fda, nda 020639 (seroquel), approved september 26, 1997
  3. ahrq medical expenditure panel survey, prescribed medicines public-use files 2014 (hc-168a) and 2024 (hc-254a): people with at least one quetiapine purchase, weighted; computed by veisund, method on the usage section of this page
  4. huhn m, et al. comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. lancet 2019 (library row)
  5. calabrese jr, et al. a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar i or ii depression. american journal of psychiatry 2005 (bolder i, the registration trial; funding statement paywalled) (library row)
  6. depping am, et al. second-generation antipsychotics for anxiety disorders. cochrane database of systematic reviews 2010 (library row)
  7. thompson w, et al. atypical antipsychotics for insomnia: a systematic review. sleep medicine 2016 (library row)
  8. højlund m, støvring h, andersen k, correll cu, hallas j. impact of low-dose quetiapine-use on glycosylated hemoglobin, triglyceride and cholesterol levels. acta psychiatrica scandinavica 2023 (public funding; authors’ unrelated industry ties recorded on the row) (library row)
  9. højlund m, andersen k, ernst mt, correll cu, hallas j. use of low-dose quetiapine increases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events: results from a nationwide active comparator-controlled cohort study. world psychiatry 2022;21:444-451 (pubmed 36073694; abstract read; not yet a library row)
  10. tiihonen j, et al. real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments in a nationwide cohort of 29,823 patients with schizophrenia. jama psychiatry 2017 (funded by janssen-cilag, which markets competing antipsychotics) (library row)
  11. the same swedish cohort, written up for readers: about half the rehospitalisation risk on clozapine or a long-acting injection, and the cautions about authorship and stopping (library row)
  12. lähteenvuo m, et al. real-world effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments for the prevention of rehospitalization in a finnish nationwide cohort of patients with bipolar disorder. jama psychiatry 2018 (library row)
  13. hayes jf, et al. self-harm, unintentional injury, and suicide in bipolar disorder during maintenance mood stabilizer treatment: a uk population-based electronic health records study. jama psychiatry 2016 (library row)
  14. coupland cac, et al. anticholinergic drug exposure and the risk of dementia: a nested case-control study. jama internal medicine 2019 (library row)
  15. bailey dg, dresser g, arnold jm. grapefruit-medication interactions: forbidden fruit or avoidable consequences? cmaj 2013 (narrative review) (library row)
we went and looked
  • unverifiabledid aripiprazole have the lowest sedation rate, 4%, of seven antipsychotics in the sino trial?said on Psychopharmacology and Psychiatry Updates, 2026-10-09; the main point holds: in the SINO trial, which randomized 3,067 inpatients to one of seven antipsychotics, the published abstract says aripiprazole was the least sedating, with relative risks of 0.30 to 0.39 against each of the other six drugs. what we could not check is the specific 4% figure, because it is not in the abstract and the full paper was closed to us.
  • confirmedcan carbamazepine lower quetiapine levels by 80-90%? the primary record says yessaid on PsychEd: Educational Psychiatry Podcast, 2026-09-01; the speaker has this right. in the dedicated interaction study, carbamazepine cut quetiapine peak levels by 80% and raised its clearance 7.5-fold, and a large drug-monitoring dataset found dose-corrected quetiapine levels 86% lower in people also taking carbamazepine.
  • misattributeddid 67% to 82% of catie patients quit their antipsychotic because it failed or because of side effects?said on Lex Fridman Podcast, 2026-09-20; The trial is real and the scale is close: in the NIMH-funded CATIE trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2005, 74% of patients stopped their first assigned antipsychotic within 18 months. By drug, the rates ran from 64% to 82%, so the top of the speaker's range is exactly right.
  • overstateddid the catie trial find the newer antipsychotics no more effective than the older drug?said on Lex Fridman Podcast, 2026-09-20; the core of this is right. in the CATIE trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2005, the older drug perphenazine did about as well as three of the four newer drugs tested (quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone), and the trial's funder, NIMH, summarized it as the newer drugs having "no substantial advantage" over the older one.

every check quotes one sentence, links the original at the timestamp, and takes each assertion to the primary record. the full list: /checked.

How long the quetiapine trials actually ran

The longest trial behind the quetiapine approval ran 6 weeks.

The gap between how long the trials ran and how long people actually take these medications is the single most important thing on this page. It is not evidence that longer use is unsafe or ineffective. It is evidence that longer use was not what got tested.

People often stay on these drugs for far longer than the trials ran. The trials behind the approval ran 6 weeks.

That does not mean longer use is unsafe. It does not mean the drug stops working either. It means longer use was never the thing that got tested.

If you have been on it a long time, that is a fair thing to ask your prescriber about.

Boxed warning: increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia

The strongest warning the FDA puts on a label, often called a black box warning. It is reproduced below word for word, not summarised.

This is the strongest warning the FDA can put on a drug label. Some people call it a black box warning. We copied it word for word. We did not shorten it and we did not soften it.

The quetiapine boxed warning covers increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia and suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

The warning below covers two things. The first is about older people. Older people who have dementia with psychosis are more likely to die if they take antipsychotic drugs. This drug is not approved for that. The second is about young people. In short studies, antidepressants raised the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior. That was in children, teens, and young adults.

The FDA’s own words follow, copied exactly.

WARNING: INCREASED MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA-RELATED PSYCHOSIS; and SUICIDAL THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIORS See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Increased Mortality in Elderly Patients with Dementia-Related Psychosis • Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Quetiapine is not approved for elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis ( 5.1 ) Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors • Increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior in children, adolescents and young adults taking antidepressants ( 5.2 ) • Monitor for worsening and emergence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors ( 5.2 ) WARNING: INCREASED MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA-RELATED PSYCHOSIS; and SUICIDAL THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIORS Increased Mortality in Elderly Patients with Dementia-Related Psychosis Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ( 5.1 )]. Quetiapine is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ( 5.1 )]. Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Antidepressants increased the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults in short-term studies. These studies did not show an increase in the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior with antidepressant use in patients over age 24; there was a reduction in risk with antidepressant use in patients aged 65 and older [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ( 5.2 )]. In patients of all ages who are started on antidepressant therapy, monitor closely for worsening, and for emergence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Advise families and caregivers of the need for close observation and communication with the prescriber [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ( 5.2 )]. Quetiapine is not approved for use in pediatric patients under ten years of age [see USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS ( 8.4 )].

FDA label effective August 25, 2026 — read the full label on DailyMed

What quetiapine is FDA approved for, and the trials behind it

Approved for schizophrenia in 1997, under application NDA 020639. Source: FDA Drugs@FDA.

Efficacy was established in three short-term 6-week controlled trials of adult inpatients: a placebo-controlled trial of five fixed doses in 361 patients, a placebo-controlled high-dose versus low-dose titration trial in 286, and a dose and dose-regimen comparison in 618 with no placebo arm. One trial carried a single fixed-dose haloperidol arm that the label calls inadequate for a reliable comparison. The label also describes a later 6-week placebo-controlled trial in adolescents, along with trials for the indications added after 1997.

The FDA approved quetiapine in 1997. The approved use was schizophrenia. The file number is NDA 020639. The source is Drugs@FDA, the FDA's own database.

Three short 6-week trials in adults staying in hospital backed the approval.

One compared five set doses against a placebo. It held 361 people. One compared a high-dose plan against a low-dose plan, with a placebo. It held 286 people. One compared doses and dosing schedules in 618 people. That one had no placebo arm at all.

One trial had a single set-dose haloperidol arm. The label itself calls that arm too weak for a reliable comparison.

The label describes more. There is a later 6-week trial against a placebo in teens. There are trials for the uses added after 1997.

Trials
3 controlled trials
Duration
6 weeks
Participants
286 to 618 patients per trial
Compared against
Placebo in two trials; dose comparison in one
The efficacy of quetiapine in the treatment of schizophrenia was established in 3 short-term (6-week) controlled trials of inpatients with schizophrenia who met DSM III-R criteria for schizophrenia. Although a single fixed dose haloperidol arm was included as a comparative treatment in one of the three trials, this single haloperidol dose group was inadequate to provide a reliable and valid comparison of quetiapine and haloperidol.

Verbatim from the quetiapine FDA label, Clinical Studies section, effective August 25, 2026 — read the full label on DailyMed.

Side effects of quetiapine in the approval trials

Pooled incidence from 3- to 12-week placebo-controlled monotherapy trials — schizophrenia (up to 6 weeks) and bipolar mania (up to 12 weeks) — covering 719 patients on quetiapine versus 404 on placebo. The label states these figures cannot be used to predict the incidence of side effects in the course of usual medical practice.

Read the limits first. These numbers pool trials against a placebo where the drug was given on its own. They ran up to 6 weeks in schizophrenia. They ran up to 12 weeks in bipolar mania. 719 people took the drug and 404 took a placebo.

The label says you cannot use these figures to predict side effect rates in ordinary care.

Weight gain on the quetiapine label

The quetiapine FDA label names weight gain in its Adverse Reactions section, in the list below.

  • Headache (21% vs 14% on placebo)
  • Agitation (20% vs 17%)
  • Somnolence (18% vs 8%)
  • Dizziness (11% vs 5%)
  • Dry mouth (9% vs 3%)
  • Constipation (8% vs 3%)
  • Pain (7% vs 5%)
  • Tachycardia (6% vs 4%)
  • Vomiting (6% vs 5%)
  • Dyspepsia (5% vs 1%)
  • Weight gain (5% vs 1%)
  • ALT increased (5% vs 1%)
In the acute therapy of schizophrenia (up to 6 weeks) and bipolar mania (up to 12 weeks) trials, the most commonly observed adverse reactions associated with the use of quetiapine monotherapy (incidence of 5% or greater) and observed at a rate on quetiapine at least twice that of placebo were somnolence (18%), dizziness (11%), dry mouth (9%), constipation (8%), ALT increased (5%), weight gain (5%), and dyspepsia (5%).

From the quetiapine FDA label, Adverse Reactions section, effective August 25, 2026 — DailyMed.

More from the quetiapine label: drug abuse and dependence

  • Not a controlled substance

    Quetiapine is not a controlled substance. It has not been systematically studied, in animals or humans, for its potential for abuse, tolerance or physical dependence, and the label advises evaluating patients for a history of drug abuse and observing them for signs of misuse.

    FDA label, Drug Abuse and Dependence section.

  • Discontinuation syndrome

    Acute withdrawal symptoms such as insomnia, nausea and vomiting have been described after abrupt cessation of atypical antipsychotics, including quetiapine. In extended-release monotherapy trials with a discontinuation phase, 12.1% of patients reported one or more discontinuation symptoms after abrupt cessation versus 6.7% on placebo, usually resolving after 1 week. The label advises gradual withdrawal.

    FDA label, Warnings and Precautions section.

How many Americans take quetiapine

Survey-based federal estimates, published with a lag of about two years. They count prescriptions filled, not outcomes.

These are federal survey numbers. They come out about two years late. They count prescriptions filled. They do not tell you if the drug helped.

8,669,046
prescriptions in the United States (2024), refills included
1,849,066
people filling them (2024), ± 395,602 (95%)

From 2014 to 2024 the estimate moved down 24%, but that is within the survey’s margin of error, so we do not call it a rise or a fall. Whatever you decide about quetiapine, you are deciding alongside about 1,849,066 other people in 2024.

Prescriptions by year: 2014 11,456,968 · 2015 9,195,116 · 2016 8,751,997 · 2017 10,402,694 · 2018 12,962,564 · 2019 13,114,561 · 2020 10,574,792 · 2021 10,957,923 · 2022 8,443,015 · 2023 10,655,018 · 2024 8,669,046.

Prescriptions are not clearly up or down since 2014. About 1.8 million people in the United States took it in 2024.

Correction (29 September 2026). An earlier version of this section took its numbers from ClinCalc DrugStats, a third-party site that republishes this survey; we now compute them from AHRQ’s public-use files ourselves. It said prescriptions were down 24% since 2014; that change is within the survey’s margin of error, so we no longer state a direction.

Source: AHRQ Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Prescribed Medicines public-use files, 2014 (HC-168A) through 2024 (HC-254A), computed by veisund. People with at least one purchase where the Multum generic name (RXDRGNAM) equals the drug, weighted by the year’s person weight; purchases include refills. Standard errors by Taylor linearization on VARSTR/VARPSU. AHRQ’s reliability rule: a year is not shown when fewer than 60 survey respondents reported the drug or the relative standard error is over 50%. AHRQ cautions that its 2018 questionnaire redesign and the 2020–2022 pandemic years make year-to-year comparisons less certain.

What people report to the FDA about quetiapine

Read this before the numbers.

Anyone can file an adverse event report — patients, doctors, manufacturers — and nobody verifies that the drug caused what was reported. There is no denominator: tens of millions of prescriptions generate reports at an unknowable rate, and reporting rises with news coverage, not necessarily with harm. Counts below are report volumes, not rates, and cannot be compared between drugs. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical decisions — we show it because you deserve to see what is in the public record, with its limits stated plainly.

Read this before the numbers.

Anyone can send a report to the FDA. Patients can. Doctors can. Drug makers can. Nobody checks that the drug caused what the report describes.

There is also no bottom number. Tens of millions of prescriptions turn into reports at a rate nobody knows. Reports go up when a drug is in the news, and that is not the same as more harm.

So these are counts of reports. They are not rates. You cannot use them to compare one drug with another. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical choices.

We show it because it is on the public record, and you should get to see it with its limits named.

191,484
reports mentioning quetiapine, all time
151,227
filed as serious (a report-level flag covering every drug and outcome in the report)
filed as serious. That flag covers the whole report, and one report can name more than one drug and more than one outcome.

Most-reported reactions

  • Drug ineffective12,857
  • Off label use12,337
  • Toxicity to various agents10,154
  • Insomnia9,282
  • Fatigue9,208
  • Weight increased8,383
  • Diabetes mellitus8,355
  • Drug interaction8,347
  • Somnolence8,322
  • Nausea8,284

“Drug ineffective” ranking this high is worth noticing: a report of not being helped counts as an adverse event too, and people file them in large numbers.

It is worth noticing how high “drug ineffective” ranks. A report that the drug did not help counts as an adverse event too. People file a lot of them.

Source: FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), via openFDA, openFDA dataset refreshed 2026-07-30 (the refresh date of the query endpoint, not the date reports run through).

Drug interactions listed on the quetiapine label

The FDA label’s interactions section, verbatim. A pharmacist checking your actual medication list beats any published list — including this one.

Below is the part of the FDA label that lists other drugs. It is copied word for word.

No list on the web can see what else you take. A pharmacist can. Ask one to check your full list.

Read the label’s interactions section

7 DRUG INTERACTIONS • Concomitant Use of Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors: Reduce quetiapine dose to one sixth when coadministered with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g. ketoconazole, ritonavir) ( 7.1 , 12.3 ) • Concomitant Use of Strong CYP3A4 Inducers: Increase quetiapine dose up to 5 fold when used in combination with a chronic treatment (more than 7 to 14 days) of potent CYP3A4 inducers (e.g. phenytoin, rifampin, St. John's wort) ( 2.6 , 7.1 , 12.3 ) • Discontinuation of Strong CYP3A4 Inducers: Reduce quetiapine dose by 5 fold within 7 to 14 days of discontinuation of CYP3A4 inducers ( 2.6 , 7.1 , 12.3 )

7.1 Effect of Other Drugs on Quetiapine The risks of using quetiapine in combination with other drugs have not been extensively evaluated in systematic studies. Given the primary CNS effects of quetiapine, caution should be used when it is taken in combination with other centrally acting drugs. Quetiapine potentiated the cognitive and motor effects of alcohol in a clinical trial in subjects with selected psychotic disorders, and alcoholic beverages should be limited while taking quetiapine. Quetiapine exposure is increased by the prototype CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole, indinavir, ritonavir, nefazodone, etc.) and decreased by the prototype CYP3A4 inducers (e.g, phenytoin, carbamazepine, rifampin, avasimibe, St. John's wort etc.). Dose adjustment of quetiapine will be necessary if it is co-administered with potent CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors. CYP3A4 Inhibitors Coadministration of ketoconazole, a potent inhibitor of cytochrome CYP3A4, resulted in significant increase in quetiapine exposure. The dose of quetiapine should be reduced to one sixth of the original dose if co-administered with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ( 2.5 ) and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ( 12.3 )]. CYP3A4 Inducers Coadministration of quetiapine and phenytoin, a CYP3A4 inducer increased the mean oral clearance of quetiapine by 5-fold. Increased doses of quetiapine up to 5 fold may be required to maintain control of symptoms of schizophrenia in patients receiving quetiapine and phenytoin, or other known potent CYP3A4 inducers [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ( 2.6 ) and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ( 12.3 )]. When the CYP3A4 inducer is discontinued, the dose of quetiapine should be reduced to the original level within 7 to 14 days [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ( 2.6 )]. Anticholinergic Drugs Concomitant treatment with quetiapine and other drugs with anticholinergic activity can increase the risk for severe gastrointestinal adverse reactions related to hypomotility. Quetiapine should be used with caution in patients receiving medications having anticholinergic (antimuscarinic) effects [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ( 5.20 ) ]. The potential effects of several concomitant medications on quetiapine pharmacokinetics were studied [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ( 12.3 )].

7.2 Effect of Quetiapine on Other Drugs Because of its potential for inducing hypotension, quetiapine may enhance the effects of certain antihypertensive agents. Quetiapine may antagonize the effects of levodopa and dopamine agonists. There are no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions of quetiapine on other drugs based on the CYP pathway. Quetiapine and its metabolites are non-inhibitors of major metabolizing CYP's (1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4).

FDA label for quetiapine, effective August 25, 2026 — DailyMed.

Label history: when this label changes, it is recorded in What changed.

Who pays for quetiapine

Two claims datasets and one survey, covering different populations with different instruments — they cannot be reconciled by arithmetic, and where their sum crowds the all-payer estimate, that is a finding about the estimates rather than a percentage.

Medicare Part D · claims · 2024Medicaid · claims floor · 2024All-payer · survey · 2024Commercially insured adults · not publishedChildren · no per-drug data
Medicare Part D
Read the under-65 group correctly before the numbers: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population — among the sickest, highest-need people in the program — and reading their utilization as typical adult use would be a category error. The beneficiary total sums brand-level rows, so treat it as an upper bound on distinct people. 1,488,315 beneficiaries filled 9,859,922 claims in 2024 — 1,039,853 aged 65 and over, and 448,462 under 65.
Medicaid
At least 6,033,466 prescriptions in 2024 — a floor, because 293 of 1,843 national data rows are suppressed for privacy and contribute zero. Medicaid covers more children than any insurer in the country and publishes no age split — how much of this number is pediatric use is not knowable from public data.
All payers (survey estimate)
A survey estimate from 123 respondents, which we computed from AHRQ’s MEPS 2024 Prescribed Medicines file (people with at least one purchase, weighted; purchases include refills), puts the whole country at 8,669,046 purchases and 1,849,066 people in 2024. Subtracting the public programs from it would produce a number for everyone else — and we do not print that number, because subtracting a survey from claims counts manufactures precision that does not exist.
The population nobody counts
The commercially insured working-age adult — statistically, the likeliest person to be reading this page — is the one population with no public per-drug count anywhere. Private claims data exists and is sold, but nothing a patient can check is published. For children the record is thinner still: no public source counts pediatric use of quetiapine specifically; the closest the public record comes is condition-level treatment rates for children, which we have traced for one condition in how childhood ADHD got counted.

Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers — by Geography and Drug, data.cms.gov, National rows, data year 2024 (published with ~17-month lag). Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data 2024, data.medicaid.gov, national aggregate rows. Retrieved 2026-09-01.

Who has been paying for quetiapine, 2019–2024

Medicare Part D

Claims, all ages — the one payer with a public per-drug series.

20192024

8,764,761 → 9,859,922 claims

Medicare under 65

Beneficiaries, not ordinary working-age adults: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population. A gap is a suppressed split, not zero.

20192024

503,559 → 448,462 beneficiaries

Medicaid

A floor each year — small-cell rows are suppressed federally and excluded from the sum.

20192024

5,715,756 → 6,033,466 prescriptions (floor)

Commercially insured adults

No public dataset publishes per-drug commercial claims for any year — the absence is the finding, and it is rendered, not interpolated. The population this library most wants to inform is the one with no public per-drug series, in any year — insurers and PBMs hold that data privately. What the federal surveys do measure — how many adults take these medications at all — is on the adult-usage page.

Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers by Geography and Drug (data.cms.gov, national rows, per data year); Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data (data.medicaid.gov, national rows). Claims, fills and beneficiaries are different units — compare each series only with itself.

The quetiapine approval, step by step

  1. Step 1

    What the approval was actually based on

    Which studies did the FDA rely on, how long did they run, and who was in them?

    The efficacy of SEROQUEL in the treatment of schizophrenia was established in 3 short-term (6-week) controlled trials of inpatients with schizophrenia who met DSM III-R criteria for schizophrenia...

    FDA-approved labelling, 14 CLINICAL STUDIES 14.1 Schizophrenia — read the label on DailyMed

    Our reading

    Three six-week trials in inpatients. Quetiapine is now very widely prescribed off-label at low doses for sleep and for anxiety — uses that appear in none of these trials and in no part of the approval, and therefore carry no approval-grade efficacy evidence at all.

  2. Step 2

    The approval

    When was it approved, under what application, and by whose review?

    Approved
    September 26, 1997
    Application
    NDA020639
    Review
    STANDARD
    Original sponsor
    AstraZeneca (now Cheplapharm)
    Holds it now
    Cheplapharm
    Label submissions since
    49

    Source: openFDA Drugs@FDA, original application ORIG-1

  3. Step 3

    What was added after it was on the market

    Which warnings arrived only after millions of people were already taking it?

  4. Step 4

    What independent research has found since

    What has been learned by people who were not selling it?

    • Years of stacked anticholinergic drugs, including some antidepressants and antipsychotics, were linked to dementia

      22 years after approval

      Some interactions are not between two named drugs but between a property several of them share. Anticholinergic burden is the clearest example in psychiatry: tricyclic antidepressants, some antipsychotics, bladder drugs and older antihistamines all block the same receptor, and the effects add.

      Significant findings

      Coupland and colleagues (JAMA Internal Medicine, 2019) ran a nested case-control study in English general practice records: "58 769 patients with a diagnosis of dementia and 225 574 controls 55 years or older matched by age, sex, general practice, and calendar time." Exposure was the cumulative prescribed dose of 56 strongly anticholinergic drugs in the 1 to 11 years before diagnosis.

      "The adjusted OR for dementia increased from 1.06 (95% CI, 1.03-1.09) in the lowest overall anticholinergic exposure category (total exposure of 1-90 TSDDs) to 1.49 (95% CI, 1.44-1.54) in the highest category (>1095 TSDDs), compared with no anticholinergic drug prescriptions in the 1 to 11 years before the index date."

      By class, at the highest exposure: "anticholinergic antidepressants (adjusted OR [AOR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.24-1.34), antiparkinson drugs (AOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16-2.00), antipsychotics (AOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.53-1.90), bladder antimuscarinic drugs (AOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.56-1.75), and antiepileptic drugs (AOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.22-1.57)". "Associations were stronger in cases diagnosed before the age of 80 years. The population-attributable fraction associated with total anticholinergic drug exposure during the 1 to 11 years before diagnosis was 10.3%."

      Worth asking

      A case-control study cannot rule out that early, undiagnosed dementia leads to these prescriptions rather than the reverse, though the authors tested windows starting 3 and 5 years before diagnosis and the association held. What the study supports is a question, not a decision: how many of your medications are strongly anticholinergic, and is the total something anyone has added up? A pharmacist can score it. The clozapine label in this wave carries the short-term version of the same warning, anticholinergic toxicity when such drugs are combined.

      Anticholinergic Drug Exposure and the Risk of Dementia: A Nested Case-Control Study — Coupland CAC, Hill T, Dening T, Morriss R, Moore M, Hippisley-Cox J (2019)

    • In 1,922 people treated for mania, continued cannabis went with worse outcomes; those who quit matched never users

      18 years after approval

      For bipolar disorder the question is usually asked about lithium or valproate and cannabis. The best data are not about the drug interaction but about what happens to the illness.

      Significant findings

      Zorrilla and colleagues (Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2015) used the EMBLEM study, "a 2-year prospective observational study in adults with a manic/mixed episode of bipolar disorder". Groups: current cannabis use (between 12 weeks and 24 months), previous use (during the first 12 weeks only), never use. "Of 1922 patients analyzed, 6.9% were current users, 4.6% previous users, and 88.5% never users."

      "Clinical outcomes differed between groups (P<0.019): previous users had highest rates of remission (68.1%) and recovery (38.7%), and lowest rates of recurrence (42.1%) and relapse (29.8%). Logistic regression showed previous users had similar outcomes to never users (all P>0.05), whereas current users had lower recovery (P=0.004) and remission (P=0.014), higher recurrence (P=0.014), greater work impairment (P=0.016), and were more likely not to be living with partner (P=0.006) than never users."

      The conclusion: "Bipolar patients who stop using cannabis during manic/mixed episode have similar clinical and functional outcomes to never users, while continued use is associated with higher risk of recurrence and poorer functioning."

      Worth asking

      Observational, and people who manage to stop cannabis during a manic episode may differ from those who cannot in ways the study could not see. What it shows cleanly is that stopping was not too late: the previous users, who had used in the first twelve weeks and then quit, matched the never users at two years. If you have bipolar disorder and use cannabis, that is the finding to bring to the conversation. The Nayak 2021 row in this wave is the separate, acute danger of psychedelics on lithium.

      Cannabis and bipolar disorder: does quitting cannabis use during manic/mixed episode improve clinical/functional outcomes? — Zorrilla I, Aguado J, Haro JM, Barbeito S, López Zurbano S, Ortiz A, López P, Gonzalez-Pinto A (2015)

    • Grapefruit interacts with more than 85 drugs, including buspirone, quetiapine, lurasidone, ziprasidone and pimozide

      16 years after approval

      The one interaction in this wave that comes from the breakfast table.

      Significant findings

      Bailey, Dresser and Arnold (CMAJ, 2013) reviewed the grapefruit literature. "Currently, more than 85 drugs ... are known or predicted to interact with grapefruit," and between 2008 and 2012 the number with the potential for serious adverse effects rose "from 17 to 43."

      The mechanism is furanocoumarins in the fruit causing "irreversible inactivation" of the enzyme CYP3A4 in the small intestine, so that drugs normally broken down there reach the blood in larger amounts. Because the enzyme is destroyed rather than blocked, the effect outlasts the fruit: a dose taken within 4 hours of grapefruit shows the maximal interaction, at 10 hours the effect is "50% of the maximum," at 24 hours "25% of the maximum." "One whole grapefruit or 200 mL of grapefruit juice is sufficient" to produce a clinically relevant effect.

      On who is affected: "Older people appear to be an especially vulnerable population for grapefruit-drug interactions," with pronounced effects in patients over 70.

      The psychiatric and neurological drugs in the review's tables include buspirone, quetiapine, lurasidone, ziprasidone, pimozide, dextromethorphan, oral ketamine, oxycodone, oral fentanyl and triazolam.

      Worth asking

      Most of the drugs on the list are raised, not lowered, which for an antipsychotic means more sedation and, for pimozide and ziprasidone, more QT prolongation. The pharmacist's answer to "can I drink grapefruit juice" depends entirely on which drugs you take, and the review's 24-hour figure means "not at the same time as the pill" is not the same as "not at all." Seville oranges, used in marmalade, contain the same compounds.

      Grapefruit-medication interactions: forbidden fruit or avoidable consequences? — Bailey DG, Dresser G, Arnold JM (2013)

    • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode…

      22 years after approval

      Across 402 randomized trials covering 53,463 adults with schizophrenia, quetiapine ranked mid-field of 32 antipsychotics for symptom reduction, with low rates of movement side effects but more sedation and a small QTc prolongation (about 3 ms) versus placebo.

      Worth asking

      Given quetiapine's middle-of-the-pack efficacy ranking, what made it the right antipsychotic for my situation compared with the alternatives?

      Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis — Huhn M, et al. (2019)

    • Second-generation antipsychotics for anxiety disorders

      13 years after approval

      Pooling 11 randomized trials (4,144 participants), people with generalized anxiety disorder were about twice as likely to respond to quetiapine as to placebo (odds ratio 2.21 across 4 trials, N=2,265), but quetiapine caused more weight gain, sedation, and dropouts from side effects — and this use is not FDA-approved.

      Worth asking

      If quetiapine was prescribed for anxiety, have we weighed its off-label benefit against the weight gain and sedation, and tried first-line anxiety treatments?

      Second-generation antipsychotics for anxiety disorders — Depping AM, et al. (2010)

    • Low-dose quetiapine is prescribed for sleep. Its metabolic effects were tested in 106,711 people

      26 years after approval

      Quetiapine is very often prescribed off-label at low doses for sleep and anxiety, on the reasoning that the metabolic problems seen at antipsychotic doses do not apply down there. Danish researchers tested that using national registers: 106,711 people who newly started quetiapine at 50 mg or less between 2008 and 2018, with blood results from the year before and the year after they started.

      What they found is worth reading carefully, because it does not flatten into a headline. Across everyone, triglycerides rose by about 5% and HDL — the cholesterol you want high — fell by about 2%. HbA1c did not change significantly, and total and LDL cholesterol actually went down.

      The part that matters is underneath that. Among people whose levels were normal before they started, HbA1c, total cholesterol and LDL all rose significantly. The overall averages were being pulled down by people who started with high numbers and were presumably being treated for them. So a real effect in healthy-baseline patients was partly hidden by the population average. The effect was also dose-dependent, which is evidence against the idea that low doses are metabolically free.

      These are small changes over one year, not a warning that the medication is dangerous. They are a reason for the blood test to happen.

      Worth asking

      What is this dose actually for, when did I last have lipids and HbA1c checked, and is there a plan to review whether I still need it.

      Impact of low-dose quetiapine-use on glycosylated hemoglobin, triglyceride and cholesterol levels — Højlund M, Støvring H, Andersen K, Correll CU, Hallas J (2023)

    • A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar I or II depression

      8 years after approval

      In 542 outpatients with bipolar I or II depression treated for 8 weeks, about 58% responded on quetiapine (300 or 600 mg/day) versus 36% on placebo, with 300 mg working as well as 600 mg.

      Worth asking

      If quetiapine is being used for bipolar depression, is the lower 300 mg dose enough for me, since the trial found no added benefit at 600 mg?

      A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar I or II depression — Calabrese JR, et al. (2005)

    • Atypical antipsychotics for insomnia: a systematic review

      19 years after approval

      Despite quetiapine's wide off-label use as a sleep aid, this systematic review found only one randomized trial ever conducted for primary insomnia — 13 patients — and it showed no significant improvement in sleep time, sleep latency, or sleep satisfaction versus placebo.

      Worth asking

      If I'm taking quetiapine mainly for sleep, what's the plan given that randomized evidence for insomnia is essentially absent and safer options exist?

      Atypical antipsychotics for insomnia: a systematic review — Thompson W, et al. (2016)

    • Real-World Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Treatments in a Nationwide Cohort of 29 823 Patients With Schizophrenia

      20 years after approval

      Following 29,823 Swedish patients with schizophrenia for up to 7.5 years, oral quetiapine had the highest rehospitalization risk of the commonly used antipsychotics — barely better than taking no antipsychotic at all (hazard ratio 0.91) and roughly 40-70% worse than clozapine or long-acting injectables.

      Worth asking

      If quetiapine is meant to prevent relapse of a psychotic disorder, is there a reason to prefer it over options with stronger real-world track records?

      Real-World Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Treatments in a Nationwide Cohort of 29 823 Patients With Schizophrenia — Tiihonen J, et al. (2017)

  5. Step 5

    What still is not known

    Which questions you might reasonably have has nobody answered yet?

    • If you were prescribed it for sleep or anxiety, that use was never part of an approval and has no registration evidence behind it. Worth asking why it was chosen over alternatives.
    • Six weeks in inpatients versus years in outpatients is the central extrapolation.
    • Weight gain and metabolic change were not primary endpoints of six-week trials.

The quetiapine legal and safety record

Settled and adjudicated matters only, from primary sources — including the litigation that was decided for the manufacturer, and the cases this drug is verifiably not part of.

Read the quetiapine legal and safety record

Deciding about quetiapine?

Open quetiapine (Seroquel) in veisund

The app has the full approval journey, the resources behind it, and people working through the same questions.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Browse the evidence library