In 2024 the sixty best-paid US psychiatrists took $28 million of the $71 million industry paid the whole specialty
Open Payments 2024: companies reported $71,386,487 in general payments to US psychiatrists. Sixty of them received $28,258,476, 40 percent of it. For those sixty, 63 percent was speaker fees and 20 percent consulting.
We have not finished checking this source. No judgement either way. how we score evidence
Caveat on this rating: The specialty field is self-reported to the NPI registry; a psychiatrist listed under another first specialty is not counted. Open Payments records what companies report and can be disputed by the physician. The product attached to a payment is the company's attribution. A PubMed name search can miss publications under a different name form and can include a namesake; counts are indicative. A payment is not evidence that a prescription changed; the Annals review in this wave is the evidence on that question.
Havlik's paper says one percent of psychiatrists take three quarters of the money. This is what the top of that one percent looks like in the federal file for 2024: who, how much, for what, and attached to which products.
Significant findings
The Open Payments 2024 general payment file lists $71,386,487 paid to physicians whose first specialty is psychiatry or a psychiatry subspecialty, across 352,705 payment records. Nine in ten records are food and beverage; they add up to 11.6 percent of the money. Speaker fees, the category CMS labels "compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program", are 4 percent of the records and 55.8 percent of the money. Havlik's series put the top one percent at 74.7 percent of the money over 2015 to 2021; the sixty below are the top of that one percent for 2024.
The sixty best-paid psychiatrists received $28,258,476, 39.6 percent of the total; the top ten received $8,870,542. For the sixty, 63.0 percent was speaker fees, 20.0 percent consulting fees and 12.9 percent travel and lodging. None of it was royalties or acquisitions.
The ten largest totals, with the products the paying companies attached to the payments: Rakesh Jain, Lake Jackson TX, $1,170,656 (Vraylar, Auvelity, Rexulti); Andrew Cutler, Lakewood Ranch FL, $1,095,695 (Caplyta, Auvelity, Vraylar); Gustavo Alva, Costa Mesa CA, $1,050,541 (Fanapt, Uzedy, NeuroStar TMS); Leslie Citrome, Pomona NY, $1,041,528 (Rexulti, Uzedy); Gregory Mattingly, St. Charles MO, $839,406 (Auvelity, Vraylar, Ingrezza); Craig Chepke, Huntersville NC, $831,214 (Vraylar, Auvelity); Henry Nasrallah, Cincinnati OH, $786,557 (Uzedy, Caplyta, Invega Sustenna); Rakesh Amin, Nashville TN, $734,674 (Auvelity, Vraylar, Ingrezza); Mark Reynolds, Durham NC, $678,215 (Uzedy, Caplyta, Invega Sustenna); Richard Petty, Loganville GA, $642,055 (Fanapt, Auvelity, Vraylar).
Ten companies paid 94 percent of the sixty's money: Axsome, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Otsuka, AbbVie, Teva, Alkermes, Neurocrine, Vanda, Janssen and Bristol Myers Squibb. The products are the branded launches of the last decade: Caplyta, Auvelity, Vraylar, Rexulti, Ingrezza, Fanapt, Lybalvi, Uzedy, Austedo XR, Abilify Maintena, Invega Sustenna, Spravato and Cobenfy. No generic appears.
The names repeat. Nineteen of the 2024 sixty were in the top thirty in each of 2021, 2022 and 2023; twenty six were there in at least two of those years.
What they have done. The group splits in two. Some are prolific authors: PubMed returns 572 records for Citrome, 296 for Nasrallah, 289 for El-Mallakh, over 100 for Cutler and over 70 each for Mattingly and Meyer, and the recent titles are largely post hoc analyses, narrative reviews and consensus panels on the same branded drugs. Eight of the sixty were also principal investigators on industry research payments in 2024, led by Maguire ($1,755,467, including KarXT trials), Mattingly ($1,002,662) and Alva ($656,148). For a number of the sixty, including several in the top twenty, a PubMed search on the name with a psychiatry term returned no indexed publication; their money is almost entirely speaker fees.
Worth asking
Every dollar here was reported by the company under federal law and is legal. A speaker fee buys a company-approved presentation delivered to other prescribers; the Inspector General's 2020 alert in this library says what it thinks that is for. Havlik's median psychiatrist got $0 a year. This is the other end of that line, by name, from the same file.
Source
Open Payments Program Year 2024 General Payment Data — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2025)
Read the source: https://www.cms.gov/priorities/key-initiatives/open-payments/data
How this was scored
- Study design
- not recorded
- Funding
- not recorded
- Published in
- not recorded
- Sample size
- 60
- Preregistered
- not recorded
- Conflicts disclosed
- not recorded
- Independent of proponent
- not recorded
- Retracted
- No
We have not finished checking this source, so there is no scoring to show yet. “We have not checked this yet” and “this is disputed” are different statements, so no scored band is shown rather than a low one.
Read the full scoring rubric, including what it can't tell you.
Published September 21, 2026.
Questions
How strong is the evidence behind this?
veisund rates this source "not yet assessed". We have not finished checking this source. No judgement either way. One caveat travels with that badge: The specialty field is self-reported to the NPI registry; a psychiatrist listed under another first specialty is not counted. Open Payments records what companies report and can be disputed by the physician. The product attached to a payment is the company's attribution. A PubMed name search can miss publications under a different name form and can include a namesake; counts are indicative. A payment is not evidence that a prescription changed; the Annals review in this wave is the evidence on that question. The score is calculated from recorded facts about the source — study design, funding, publication venue, sample size, preregistration — not typed in by an editor.
What is the source for this?
Open Payments Program Year 2024 General Payment Data — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2025). The full source is linked on this page so you can read it yourself.
Is this medical advice?
This is information to bring to your prescriber, not medical advice and not a reason to change anything on your own. Nothing here is an instruction to stop or reduce a medication. If you are in crisis, call or text 988.
This is information to bring to your prescriber, not medical advice and not a reason to change anything on your own. Nothing here is an instruction to stop or reduce a medication. If you are in crisis, call or text 988.