Medication approval journey

aripiprazole (Abilify)

Approved for Schizophrenia, and acute manic and mixed episodes

page first published · last updated

Also answers to “the former best seller” — its codename in our videos and posts. The full codebook

FDA approvedAntipsychoticTaper risk: high

How this page reads

The page as written, with the clinical terms

Plain language uses the same facts, the same numbers and the same caveats. It does not leave anything out. Quotes from the FDA label are never reworded in either setting.

Before you stop or change your aripiprazole dose

Stopping abruptly can be dangerous — never do it without medical supervision

Do not stop an antipsychotic abruptly. Abrupt withdrawal can cause rebound or supersensitivity psychosis and withdrawal movement disorders, and relapse risk is highest with the fastest reductions. Any change should be a slow, prescriber-supervised taper.

what the aripiprazole warnings mean

label facts below are read from the aripiprazole tablets FDA label on DailyMed, set id 1d593ada-256d-4dec-9a26-2a6a67d97205, version 13, effective july 31, 2026, the version the dossier above cites. the section numbers in brackets are the label’s own. every source is linked at the end of this section. last checked 2026-10-13.

aripiprazole was approved on november 15, 2002 under the brand abilify, for schizophrenia, and its label now carries five approved uses: schizophrenia in adults and in adolescents aged 13 to 17; acute manic or mixed episodes of bipolar i disorder in adults and children aged 10 to 17, alone or added to lithium or valproate; as an add-on to an antidepressant in adults with major depressive disorder; irritability in children aged 6 to 17 with autistic disorder; and tourette’s disorder in children aged 6 to 18 [label 1; approval]. about 1.8 million americans filled a prescription for it in 2024, against about 1.0 million in 2014; the number of prescriptions rose from about 6.5 million to 8.2 million, a change within the survey’s margin of error [meps]. it is not a controlled substance [label 9.1]. its label opens with a two-part boxed warning, one on deaths among older people with dementia and one on suicidal thoughts in young people, and runs through fifteen numbered warnings, among them the one aripiprazole is known for: intense urges to gamble, and other compulsive behaviours, reported after approval. this section says what each means in plain words, what the approval trials measured and for how long, which side effects the label counts and how often, and what independent research has found since, in both directions. every number is from the label, an fda document, or a study in the library, and each source is linked at the end.

this is information to take to a prescriber. nothing here is a reason to start, stop or change a dose on your own; the questions at the end are questions, and the quetiapine and risperidone explainers this page is often compared with are linked at the end rather than repeated [quetiapine-explainer; risperidone-explainer].

the boxed warning, part one: deaths among older people with dementia-related psychosis

the first part of the boxed warning says that elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death, and that aripiprazole is not approved for them [label, boxed warning and 5.1]. the number behind it is a pooled analysis of 17 placebo-controlled trials, mostly of atypical antipsychotics and mostly about 10 weeks long: the death rate was about 4.5% on drug against about 2.6% on placebo, 1.6 to 1.7 times higher, with most deaths cardiovascular, such as heart failure or sudden death, or infectious, such as pneumonia [fda-dementia].

unlike some labels in the class, this one also reports aripiprazole’s own trials in that population. in three 10-week placebo-controlled studies of 938 elderly people with psychosis associated with alzheimer’s disease, mean age 82, the reactions at least twice as common on aripiprazole were lethargy (5% against 2%), somnolence (8% against 3%), incontinence (5% against 1%), excessive salivation (4% against 0%) and lightheadedness (4% against 1%), and the label says safety and efficacy in that group "have not been established" [label 5.1]. in the same studies there were more strokes and transient ischaemic attacks, including fatal ones, on aripiprazole, with a statistically significant dose-response in the fixed-dose study, mean age 84 [label 5.2]. the geriatric section adds that the schizophrenia, mania and depression trials did not include enough people over 65 to say whether they respond differently [label 8.5].

the boxed warning, part two: suicidal thoughts and behaviors, by age

the second part is the antidepressant class warning, which aripiprazole carries because it is approved as an add-on in depression. it says antidepressants increased the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior in children, adolescents and young adults in short-term studies, that the studies "did not show an increase" above age 24 and showed "a reduction in risk" at 65 and older, and that everyone starting one should be watched closely [label, boxed warning and 5.3]. the label states the difference against placebo per 1,000 people treated: under 18, 14 additional cases; 18 to 24, 5 additional; 25 to 64, 1 fewer; 65 and older, 6 fewer [label 5.3, table 3]. the pooled trials were 24 short-term trials of 9 antidepressants in more than 4,400 children and 295 trials of 11 antidepressants in more than 77,000 adults, median two months; none was of aripiprazole itself. no suicides occurred in the pediatric trials; the adult trials had too few to conclude anything about suicide [label 5.3].

so the warning has an age boundary that is printed in the label and rarely repeated [age-ceiling]. the label says the risk beyond several months is unknown, that prescribers should consider changing the regimen, "including possibly discontinuing the medication", in anyone whose depression is persistently worse, and that "aripiprazole is not approved for use in treating depression in the pediatric population" [label 5.3]. that is an instruction to prescribers about watching, not an instruction to patients about stopping. a separate warning says the possibility of suicide "is inherent" in psychosis, bipolar disorder and depression, and that prescriptions should be written for the smallest quantity consistent with good care [label 5.14].

the gambling and impulse-control warning

warning 5.7 is the one specific to this drug. "postmarketing case reports suggest that patients can experience intense urges, particularly for gambling, and the inability to control these urges while taking aripiprazole." the less frequent urges it lists are sexual urges, shopping, eating or binge eating, "and other impulsive or compulsive behaviors". because people "may not recognize these behaviors as abnormal", the label tells prescribers to ask patients or their caregivers specifically about new or intense urges of each kind. it concedes that impulse-control symptoms "can be associated with the underlying disorder", reports that "in some cases, although not all, urges were reported to have stopped when the dose was reduced, or the medication was discontinued", and ends with an instruction to the prescriber: "consider dose reduction or stopping the medication if a patient develops such urges" [label 5.7]. pathological gambling also appears in the post-marketing list, which the label says comes from voluntary reports from a population of uncertain size, so no rate can be estimated [label 6.2]. the warning was added to the label after an fda safety communication in may 2016; that document is cited on this site’s legal and safety record page, which is listed as a source here and not repeated [legal-record].

the one population study in the library is a swedish register study of every person in the country diagnosed with pathological gambling between 2005 and 2019, 3,689 people, each matched to two controls, 11,067 in all. within the subgroup with schizophrenia or a related psychotic disorder, an aripiprazole prescription was associated with a gambling diagnosis at an odds ratio of 3.4; dopamine agonists used in parkinson’s disease, which carry the same kind of warning, showed 3.2. the study has no time dimension, so it cannot show which came first, the subgroup is small and heavily selected, and one author holds a chair funded by the state gambling operator, which the paper discloses [wolfschlag-2021]. the finding is consistent with the case reports and with the drug’s pharmacology; it is not proof, and the library record says so.

the metabolic warning, with the label’s tables

warning 5.6 is the class warning that atypical antipsychotics cause hyperglycemia and diabetes, undesirable lipid changes and weight gain, that each drug has its own profile, and that fasting glucose should be tested at the start and periodically in anyone with diabetes risk factors, with regular weight monitoring [label 5.6]. the label adds that because aripiprazole "was not marketed at the time" the epidemiological studies of the class were done, "it is not known if aripiprazole is associated with this increased risk" [label 5.6]. its own tables are among the smallest in the class, and the controlled data mostly stop at three to six weeks.

  • blood sugar, adults [5.6, table 4]: across 13 placebo-controlled monotherapy trials, median exposure 25 days, mean fasting glucose rose 4.4 mg/dl on aripiprazole (1,057 people) against 2.5 on placebo (799), not significantly different. the share going from normal to high (126 mg/dl or more) was 3.8% against 3.6%; from borderline to high, 17.6% against 9.2%. at 24 weeks the mean change was +2.2 mg/dl on aripiprazole against +9.6 on placebo, in 42 and 28 people. as an add-on in depression, +0.7 against +0.8 mg/dl over a median 42 days [5.6, table 5].
  • lipids, adults [5.6, table 7]: across 17 trials, the share going from normal to high total cholesterol was 2.5% against 2.8%; fasting triglycerides 7.4% against 7.0%; ldl 0.6% against 0.7%; hdl falling to low 11.4% against 12.5%. as an add-on in depression, triglycerides ran the other way, 9.7% against 4.1% [5.6, table 8]. the label says analyses at 12 and 24 weeks "were limited by small numbers of patients".
  • weight, adults [5.6, table 12]: +0.3 kg on aripiprazole (1,673 people) against -0.1 kg on placebo (1,100) over a median 21 to 25 days; at 24 weeks, -1.5 kg against -0.2 kg in 73 and 46 people. the share gaining 7% or more of body weight was 8.1% against 3.2% in schizophrenia (4 to 6 weeks), 2.2% against 2.7% in mania (3 weeks), and 5.2% against 0.6% as an add-on in depression (6 weeks), where the mean change was +1.7 kg against +0.4 kg.
  • weight, children and adolescents [5.6, table 13; 8.4]: in schizophrenia and bipolar trials of 4 to 6 weeks, +1.6 kg against +0.3 kg, with 5.2% against 1.6% gaining 7% or more; at 24 weeks, +5.8 kg against +1.4 kg, in 62 and 13 children. in the autism trials, 26.3% against 7.1% gained 7% or more over 8 weeks; in tourette’s, 20.0% against 7.6% over 8 to 10 weeks. in the open-label follow-on, 32.8% of the schizophrenia and bipolar children had gained 7% or more by 26 weeks, not adjusted for growth; adjusted for growth, the mean weight z-score change was +0.09 standard deviations, which the label counts as not clinically significant. in the autism follow-on, children treated for more than nine months had a z-score change of +0.26.
  • the comparison across the class [pillinger-2020]: in a network meta-analysis of 100 randomised trials in 25,952 people with schizophrenia, aripiprazole was among the antipsychotics with the most favourable metabolic profile, the least weight gain and the smallest blood-sugar and cholesterol changes, while olanzapine and clozapine caused the most.

akathisia and movement side effects: where aripiprazole’s numbers run high

what the metabolic tables give back, the movement tables take, and the pattern depends on the use. akathisia, an inner restlessness with an urge to move that people often find the hardest side effect to live with, was the only reaction at 5% or more and twice placebo in the adult schizophrenia trials: 8% against 4% [label 6.1]. in adult mania it was 13% against 4%, with sedation 8% against 3%, restlessness 6% against 3%, tremor 6% against 3% and extrapyramidal disorder 5% against 2% [label 6.1, table 14]; added to lithium or valproate, 19% against 5%, and akathisia was the main reason people stopped (5% against 1%) [label 6.1, table 16]. as an add-on in depression it was 25% against 4%, with restlessness 12% against 2% and insomnia 8% against 2% [label 6.1, table 21]. the independent trial in older adults found the same thing: akathisia in 26% against 12% [lenze-2015].

in children the movement figures are higher and rise with dose. in the adolescent schizophrenia trial, extrapyramidal events other than akathisia were 25% against 7%, and by dose 5.0% on placebo, 13.0% at 10 mg and 21.6% at 30 mg [label 6.1]. in the pediatric bipolar trial, 26% against 5%, and by dose 3.1%, 12.2% and 27.3%, with somnolence 23% against 3% and salivary hypersecretion 6% against 0% [label 6.1, table 17]. in the autism trials, 18% against 2%, with tremor 10% against 0% and drooling 9% against 0% [label 6.1, table 18]. the label notes that the rating scales used to measure these effects objectively often did not show a difference from placebo in adults, while the counts of reported events did [label 6.1].

tardive dyskinesia [5.5] is the separate, potentially irreversible movement disorder that can follow long antipsychotic treatment. the label says it is impossible to predict who will develop it, that whether antipsychotics differ in their potential to cause it is unknown, that the risk rises with duration and cumulative dose, and that chronic treatment should be reserved for chronic illness with no equally effective, less harmful alternative, at the smallest dose and shortest duration that works, with the need reassessed periodically [label 5.5]. neuroleptic malignant syndrome [5.4], a rare and potentially fatal reaction with high fever, rigid muscles, confusion and unstable pulse or blood pressure, has occurred with aripiprazole; the label says stop at once and treat in hospital.

the other warnings, in plain words

the warnings section runs from 5.1 to 5.15. beyond those above:

  • low blood pressure and falls [5.8, 5.9]: orthostatic hypotension 1% against 0.3% in 2,467 adults, syncope 0.5% against 0.4%; caution in heart or cerebrovascular disease, dehydration and with blood-pressure drugs. antipsychotics "may cause somnolence, postural hypotension, motor and sensory instability, which may lead to falls", so the label asks for fall-risk assessment at the start and periodically on long-term treatment.
  • drowsiness and driving [5.12]: somnolence including sedation in 11% of adults against 6%, and in 24% of children against 6%; it led 0.3% of adults and 3% of children to stop. in the fixed-dose schizophrenia trials it was the only reaction with a dose relationship, 12.6% at 30 mg against 7.1% on placebo [6.1].
  • white cells [5.10]: leukopenia, neutropenia and agranulocytosis have been reported with antipsychotics including aripiprazole; anyone with a history of low white cells should have blood counts checked frequently in the first months.
  • seizures [5.11]: 0.1% of adults (3 of 2,467) and 0.1% of children (1 of 732) in the short-term trials, with people with a seizure history excluded.
  • swallowing and temperature [5.13, 5.15]: antipsychotics can impair the body’s ability to cool itself and can cause oesophageal dysmotility and aspiration, "a common cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly patients, in particular those with advanced alzheimer’s dementia".
  • the enzymes that change the dose [2.6, 7.1, table 1]: aripiprazole is cleared by two liver enzymes, cyp2d6 and cyp3a4, and the label sets dose multipliers rather than cautions. with a strong cyp2d6 inhibitor (it names quinidine, fluoxetine and paroxetine) or a strong cyp3a4 inhibitor (itraconazole, clarithromycin), half the usual dose; with both, a quarter; with a strong cyp3a4 inducer (carbamazepine, rifampin), double the dose over one to two weeks; in a known cyp2d6 poor metabolizer, half, and a quarter with a strong cyp3a4 inhibitor. the elimination half-life is about 75 hours, about 146 hours in poor metabolizers, and steady state takes about 14 days [12.3]. as an add-on in depression, the label says to use the depression dosing without these adjustments [2.6]. no adjustment is needed with lithium, valproate, lamotrigine, lorazepam or sertraline [7.2].
  • benzodiazepines [7.1]: with lorazepam, "the intensity of sedation was greater with the combination" and orthostatic hypotension was greater than with lorazepam alone; the label says to monitor both. blood-pressure drugs: aripiprazole may enhance their effect.
  • pregnancy and breastfeeding [8.1, 8.2]: babies exposed in the third trimester are at risk of movement and withdrawal symptoms after birth (agitation, abnormal muscle tone, tremor, somnolence, breathing and feeding problems), some recovering within hours and others needing prolonged hospital care. published studies "have not established a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes"; a medicaid study of 9,258 women exposed to antipsychotics in pregnancy "did not indicate an overall increased risk for major birth defects". animal studies at 10 and 19 times the maximum human dose showed fetal harm. exposure in pregnancy "can have variable effects on milk supply".
  • not a controlled substance [9.1 to 9.3]: aripiprazole has not been systematically studied for abuse or dependence; monkeys showed withdrawal signs on abrupt stopping, and the clinical trials showed no drug-seeking.
  • overdose [10]: no fatality has been reported with aripiprazole alone; the largest known ingestion with a known outcome was 1,260 mg, 42 times the maximum daily dose, with full recovery. the label asks for an electrocardiogram.

what the approval trials measured, and for how long

schizophrenia: five placebo-controlled trials of four or six weeks in acutely relapsed inpatients, 414, 404, 420 and 367 people in the four that worked; "one study, the smallest, did not" distinguish the drug from placebo [label 14.1]. the fourth trial tested 2, 5 and 10 mg, and only 10 mg beat placebo; across the trials "there was no evidence that the higher dose groups offered any advantage over the lowest dose group" [label 14.1], which is why the dosing section says doses above 10 or 15 mg "were not more effective" [label 2.1]. three trials carried a risperidone or haloperidol arm "not designed to allow for a comparison" [label 14.1]. one 26-week trial randomised 310 people who had been stable on other antipsychotics to 15 mg or placebo and measured time to relapse, which was longer on the drug [label 14.1]. in adolescents, one 6-week trial of 302 outpatients, where 30 mg was not better than 10 mg [label 14.1, table 23].

mania: four 3-week placebo-controlled trials in hospitalised adults, 268, 248, 480 and 485 people, and one 6-week trial of 384 people adding it to lithium or valproate [label 14.2]. in the maintenance trials, 161 adults stable on the drug were randomised to continue or switch to placebo: 19 mood events against 36, with the difference in manic episodes (6 against 19) and not in depressive ones (9 against 11); in the 52-week add-on trial of 337 people, 25 events against 43, again manic (7 against 19) rather than depressive (14 against 18) [label 14.2]. the label states that pattern without comment. in children, one 4-week trial of 296 [label 14.2].

depression: two 6-week trials, 381 and 362 adults, whose depression had not responded to one to three prior antidepressants and then to eight weeks of a prospective one. added to that antidepressant at a mean final dose of about 11 mg, aripiprazole beat placebo on the montgomery-asberg scale by 2.84 and 3.01 points [label 14.3, table 25]. "a smaller mean reduction" was seen in men than women [label 14.3]. that is the whole approved record for the use for which most of the library rows exist.

autism and tourette’s: two 8-week trials in 98 and 218 children for irritability, with more than 75% under 13; a maintenance trial in which 85 stabilised children were randomised to continue or switch to placebo for 16 weeks did not establish maintenance efficacy [label 14.4; 8.4]. two trials of 8 and 10 weeks in 133 and 61 children for tics [label 14.5]. maintenance efficacy in children for every use is either unestablished or "extrapolated from adult data" [label 8.4]. the pediatric section also reports juvenile animal studies in which rats and dogs showed harm at every dose tested, with "no safety margin" at the lowest dose relative to the exposure of an adolescent on 15 mg; all effects reversed after two months off the drug [label 8.4].

side effects, with the label’s numbers

across 1,843 adults on aripiprazole against 1,166 on placebo in the short-term schizophrenia and mania trials: headache 27% against 23%, agitation 19% against 17%, insomnia 18% against 13%, anxiety 17% against 13%, nausea 15% against 11%, constipation 11% against 7%, vomiting 11% against 6%, dizziness 10% against 7%, akathisia 10% against 4%, dyspepsia 9% against 7%, sedation 7% against 4%, fatigue 6% against 4%, extrapyramidal disorder, tremor, somnolence and restlessness each 5% against 3%, blurred vision 3% against 1% [label 6.1, table 15]. as an add-on in depression, 371 against 366: akathisia 25% against 4%, restlessness 12% against 2%, fatigue 8% against 4%, insomnia 8% against 2%, blurred vision 6% against 1%, somnolence 6% against 4%, constipation 5% against 2% [label 6.1, table 21]. among children, pooled: somnolence 16% against 4%, headache 12% against 10%, fatigue 10% against 2%, sedation 9% against 2%, tremor 9% against 1%, nausea and vomiting 8% each, increased appetite 7% against 3% [label 6.1, table 20].

dropout for side effects: 6% against 2% as an add-on in depression, 12% against 6% added to lithium or valproate, 5% against 2% in adolescent schizophrenia, 7% against 2% in pediatric bipolar, 10% against 8% in autism, 7% against 1% in tourette’s; the label gives no dropout figure for the adult schizophrenia or mania monotherapy trials [label 6.1]. in the 26-week schizophrenia trial, tremor was 8% against 2%, mostly mild, early and short [label 6.1]. prolactin runs the other way from most antipsychotics: "blood prolactin decreased" is listed as frequent and "blood prolactin increased" as rare [label 6.1]. the aripiprazole label has no qt warning; qt prolongation appears only as a rare laboratory finding and among overdose reports [label 6.1, 10].

what the research says, in both directions

in favour. in the network meta-analysis of 402 randomised trials in 53,463 adults with schizophrenia, all 32 antipsychotics including aripiprazole reduced symptoms more than placebo, the drugs differed more in side effects than in effectiveness, and aripiprazole was one of only five that significantly improved quality of life against placebo (standardised mean difference -0.49) [huhn-2019]. on metabolic effects it sat among the most favourable of 18 drugs [pillinger-2020]. in 181 adults aged 60 or over whose depression had not remitted on an antidepressant, adding aripiprazole produced remission in 44% against 29% on placebo [lenze-2015]. in 619 adults aged 60 or over with treatment-resistant depression, adding aripiprazole improved well-being more than switching to bupropion (a 4.83-point against 2.04-point gain over 10 weeks) and 28.9% remitted [lenze-2023]. a meta-analysis of 16 placebo-controlled trials in 3,480 people found that adding an atypical antipsychotic to an antidepressant roughly doubled the odds of remission (odds ratio 2.00) [nelson-2009].

against, or smaller than it sounds. in the same meta-analysis, dropout because of side effects was nearly four times as likely as on placebo (odds ratio 3.91), and the funding of the analysis and of several included trials could not be read from open sources [nelson-2009]. the late-life trial’s remission gain came with akathisia in 26% against 12% [lenze-2015]. the label’s own depression trials show a difference of about three points on a clinician scale over six weeks, with one in four people restless [label 14.3; 6.1, table 21]. the schizophrenia record is four to six weeks of placebo-controlled data plus one 26-week relapse trial, and the maintenance trials in bipolar disorder prevented manic episodes without a measurable effect on depressive ones [label 14.1, 14.2]. the children’s weight and movement figures are larger than the adults’, maintenance efficacy in children is unestablished or extrapolated, and the juvenile animal studies had no safety margin [label 5.6; 6.1; 8.4]. the impulse-control warning rests on case reports and one register study that cannot show which came first [label 5.7; wolfschlag-2021].

the warnings, measured. the dementia warning’s size is the class pooled analysis, 4.5% against 2.6% over about 10 weeks, plus aripiprazole’s own stroke signal with a dose-response [fda-dementia; label 5.2]. the suicidality warning’s size is the label’s own table, 14 extra cases per 1,000 under 18 and none above 24 [label 5.3]. the metabolic warning’s size, for this drug, is the smallest in the class on the independent comparison [pillinger-2020]. the akathisia figure, 25% against 4% in the depression trials, is the label’s own [label 6.1, table 21].

questions to ask your prescriber about aripiprazole

each one comes from a warning or a study above. they are questions, not instructions; the answers depend on a history nobody here has.

  • the label tells you to ask me specifically about new or intense urges to gamble, spend, eat or have sex, because i may not recognise them as abnormal. can we put that question on the list for every visit, and can someone close to me know to watch for it?
  • if i am taking this with an antidepressant: the approval trials ran six weeks and found about a three-point difference on a clinician scale, with akathisia in one in four. what is the plan for judging whether it is helping, and by when?
  • akathisia was 25% against 4% in the depression trials and 13% against 4% in the mania trials. what does it feel like, how would we tell it from anxiety, and what would we do if it appeared?
  • i take fluoxetine, paroxetine, quinidine, itraconazole, clarithromycin, carbamazepine or rifampin. the label halves, quarters or doubles the dose with each of these; is anything i take on that list, and has my dose been adjusted?
  • the label says doses above 10 or 15 mg were not more effective in schizophrenia, and that 30 mg was not better than 10 mg in adolescents. if i am above that, what is the higher dose for?
  • if this is for a child: the label reports larger weight and movement effects in children than adults, says maintenance efficacy is unestablished or extrapolated, and reports juvenile animal studies with no safety margin. how long is the plan, and what are we measuring?
  • the label says fasting glucose should be tested at the start and periodically in anyone with diabetes risk factors, and weight monitored regularly. has that been scheduled?
  • if we ever reduce or stop, the label gives no taper for this drug and says tardive dyskinesia may remit if treatment is withdrawn. what would the plan look like, and what would we watch for?
  • if this is for an older relative with dementia: the boxed warning says aripiprazole is not approved for that, and the label reports more strokes and deaths in that group. what specific behaviour are we treating, and what has been tried that is not a drug?

questions people ask

what does the abilify (aripiprazole) black box warning mean?
it has two parts. first, older people with dementia-related psychosis who are treated with antipsychotics die at a higher rate than on placebo: about 4.5% against 2.6% over about 10 weeks across 17 pooled trials, mostly from heart or infectious causes, and aripiprazole is not approved for them; aripiprazole’s own trials in that group also found more strokes, with a dose-response. second, the antidepressant class warning: in pooled trials, suicidal thoughts and behaviors increased in people under 25 (14 extra cases per 1,000 under 18, 5 extra at 18 to 24) and not above 24, with 6 fewer per 1,000 at 65 and older. aripiprazole carries it because it is approved as an add-on in depression; it is not approved for depression in children. the warning says to watch everyone starting it, especially in the first months and after dose changes.
does abilify cause gambling or compulsive behaviour?
the label says post-marketing case reports suggest people can experience intense urges, particularly for gambling, and an inability to control them while taking aripiprazole, with sexual urges, shopping and binge eating reported less often. it tells prescribers to ask patients and caregivers specifically about new urges, because people may not recognise them as abnormal, notes that in some cases the urges stopped when the dose was reduced or the drug stopped, and tells prescribers to consider dose reduction or stopping if urges develop. the label gives no rate; voluntary reports cannot produce one. the one population study in the library, a swedish register study of 3,689 people with gambling disorder, found an aripiprazole prescription associated with the diagnosis at an odds ratio of 3.4 within people with psychotic disorders, but could not show which came first. the question for a prescriber is whether anything about spending, gambling, eating or sexual behaviour has changed since starting.
does abilify cause weight gain?
less than most antipsychotics in adults, more in children. the label’s adult tables show +0.3 kg against -0.1 kg on placebo over about three weeks and -1.5 kg against -0.2 kg at 24 weeks; 8.1% against 3.2% gained 7% or more of body weight in the schizophrenia trials, 2.2% against 2.7% in mania, and 5.2% against 0.6% as an add-on in depression, where the mean change was +1.7 kg against +0.4 kg. in children, +1.6 kg against +0.3 kg over 4 to 6 weeks, +5.8 kg against +1.4 kg at 24 weeks, and 26.3% against 7.1% of children with autism gained 7% or more over 8 weeks. the independent comparison of 18 antipsychotics placed aripiprazole among the most favourable for weight, blood sugar and cholesterol, with olanzapine and clozapine the least.
what are the most common abilify side effects?
in the label’s adult schizophrenia and mania trials, 1,843 people against 1,166 on placebo: headache 27% vs 23%, agitation 19% vs 17%, insomnia 18% vs 13%, anxiety 17% vs 13%, nausea 15% vs 11%, constipation 11% vs 7%, vomiting 11% vs 6%, dizziness 10% vs 7%, akathisia 10% vs 4%, sedation 7% vs 4%. as an add-on in depression: akathisia 25% vs 4%, restlessness 12% vs 2%, insomnia 8% vs 2%, fatigue 8% vs 4%, blurred vision 6% vs 1%. in children: somnolence 16% vs 4%, fatigue 10% vs 2%, sedation 9% vs 2%, tremor 9% vs 1%, with extrapyramidal effects rising with dose. the label’s one-line summary for adults with schizophrenia is a single reaction at twice placebo, akathisia.
what is akathisia, and how common is it on abilify?
akathisia is an inner restlessness with a compelling urge to move, often felt in the legs, which people frequently describe as the hardest antipsychotic side effect to live with. in the label’s trials it was 8% against 4% in adult schizophrenia, 13% against 4% in mania, 19% against 5% when added to lithium or valproate, and 25% against 4% when added to an antidepressant, where restlessness was a further 12% against 2%. the independent trial in adults over 60 found 26% against 12%. the label counts it among the symptoms that can precede worsening depression or suicidality in people on antidepressants, which is one reason it tells prescribers to watch for it in the first months and after dose changes.
does abilify work for depression?
as an add-on, by a modest margin. the label’s two 6-week trials, 381 and 362 adults whose depression had not responded to prior antidepressants, found aripiprazole added to the antidepressant beat placebo by 2.84 and 3.01 points on the montgomery-asberg scale, with akathisia in 25% against 4% and dropout for side effects 6% against 2%. independent trials in older adults found remission in 44% against 29% on placebo at a cost of akathisia in 26% against 12%, and in a 619-person trial adding aripiprazole beat switching to bupropion on well-being with 28.9% remitting. a meta-analysis of 16 trials found adding an atypical antipsychotic roughly doubled the odds of remission and nearly quadrupled the odds of stopping for side effects. aripiprazole is not approved for depression on its own, or for depression in children.
what happens if you stop abilify suddenly?
the label has no discontinuation warning for aripiprazole and gives no taper. what it does say: tardive dyskinesia may remit, partially or completely, if antipsychotic treatment is withdrawn, while treatment itself can mask it; monkeys showed withdrawal signs on abrupt stopping, and the human trials were not designed to look; when switching antipsychotics, immediate stopping may be acceptable for some people with schizophrenia and gradual stopping better for others; and the need for continued treatment should be reassessed periodically. the elimination half-life is about 75 hours, so the drug leaves the body over a couple of weeks rather than days. none of that is a reason to stop on one’s own; the condition being treated is the larger risk, and a plan belongs with a prescriber.
how is abilify different from seroquel (quetiapine) or risperdal (risperidone)?
all three carry the dementia boxed warning and the metabolic and tardive dyskinesia class warnings. the label facts that differ: aripiprazole’s weight, glucose and lipid tables are among the smallest in the class and prolactin tends to fall rather than rise, while akathisia and restlessness run high, especially as an add-on in depression; it has the impulse-control warning the others do not; and its label carries no qt warning. the quetiapine and risperidone labels each have their own explainer on this site [quetiapine-explainer; risperidone-explainer], and the drugs are compared side by side on the comparison pages [compare-quetiapine; compare-risperidone]. nothing in any of the labels is a reason to prefer one drug; that is a prescriber’s decision.

sources for this section

the library rows link to our one-page summary of each study, with the original paper, its funding and our evidence grade on that page.

  1. aripiprazole tablets prescribing information, fda label on dailymed (set id 1d593ada-256d-4dec-9a26-2a6a67d97205, version 13, effective july 31, 2026; remedyrepack, anda 207105): boxed warning; sections 1, 2.1 to 2.6 with table 1, 4, 5.1 to 5.15 with tables 3 to 13, 6.1 with tables 14 to 21, 6.2, 7.1 table 22, 7.2, 8.1, 8.2, 8.4, 8.5, 9.1 to 9.3, 10, 12.3, 14.1 to 14.5 with tables 23 to 27
  2. drugs@fda, nda 021436 (abilify, otsuka), approved november 15, 2002
  3. ahrq medical expenditure panel survey, prescribed medicines public-use files 2014 (hc-168a) and 2024 (hc-254a): people with at least one aripiprazole purchase and prescriptions, weighted; the 2014 to 2024 prescription change is within the survey’s margin of error; computed by veisund, method on the usage section of this page
  4. the antipsychotic dementia boxed warning, read for the library from the risperidone label: 17 pooled trials, about 4.5% against 2.6% deaths, mostly cardiovascular or infectious (library row)
  5. the antidepressant suicidality warning’s age ceiling, from the labels themselves, as a library row (library row)
  6. wolfschlag m, håkansson a. increased risk for developing gambling disorder under the treatment with pramipexole, ropinirole, and aripiprazole: a nationwide register study in sweden. plos one 2021 (3,689 cases, 11,067 people; the library record explains why it is weak evidence and discloses the funding of one author’s chair) (library row)
  7. huhn m, et al. comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. lancet 2019 (402 trials, 53,463 people) (library row)
  8. pillinger t, et al. comparative effects of 18 antipsychotics on metabolic function in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. lancet psychiatry 2020 (100 trials, 25,952 people) (library row)
  9. lenze ej, et al. efficacy, safety, and tolerability of augmentation pharmacotherapy with aripiprazole for treatment-resistant depression in late life: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. lancet 2015 (181 adults aged 60 and over) (library row)
  10. lenze ej, et al. antidepressant augmentation versus switch in treatment-resistant geriatric depression (optimum). new england journal of medicine 2023 (619 adults aged 60 and over) (library row)
  11. nelson jc, papakostas gi. atypical antipsychotic augmentation in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. american journal of psychiatry 2009 (16 trials, 3,480 people; funding not readable from open sources) (library row)
  12. what the quetiapine (seroquel) warnings mean, the companion explainer on this site
  13. what the risperidone (risperdal) warnings mean, the companion explainer on this site
  14. aripiprazole vs quetiapine, the side-by-side comparison page on this site
  15. aripiprazole vs risperidone, the side-by-side comparison page on this site
we went and looked

every check quotes one sentence, links the original at the timestamp, and takes each assertion to the primary record. the full list: /checked.

How long the aripiprazole trials actually ran

The longest trial behind the aripiprazole approval ran 3 weeks.

The gap between how long the trials ran and how long people actually take these medications is the single most important thing on this page. It is not evidence that longer use is unsafe or ineffective. It is evidence that longer use was not what got tested.

People often stay on these drugs for far longer than the trials ran. The short trials behind the approval ran 4 to 6 weeks.

That does not mean longer use is unsafe. It does not mean the drug stops working either. It means longer use was never the thing that got tested.

If you have been on it a long time, that is a fair thing to ask your prescriber about.

Boxed warning: increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia

The strongest warning the FDA puts on a label, often called a black box warning. It is reproduced below word for word, not summarised.

This is the strongest warning the FDA can put on a drug label. Some people call it a black box warning. We copied it word for word. We did not shorten it and we did not soften it.

The aripiprazole boxed warning covers increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia and suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

The warning below covers two things. The first is about older people. Older people who have dementia with psychosis are more likely to die if they take antipsychotic drugs. This drug is not approved for that. The second is about young people. In short studies, antidepressants raised the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior. That was in children, teens, and young adults.

The FDA’s own words follow, copied exactly.

WARNING: INCREASED MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA-RELATED PSYCHOSIS AND SUICIDAL THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIORS WITH ANTIDEPRESSANT DRUGS Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Aripiprazole is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )] . Antidepressants increased the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults in short-term studies. These studies did not show an increase in the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior with antidepressant use in patients over age 24 years; there was a reduction in risk with antidepressant use in patients aged 65 years and older [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 )]. In patients of all ages who are started on antidepressant therapy, monitor closely for worsening, and for emergence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Advise families and caregivers of the need for close observation and communication with the prescriber [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 )]. WARNING: INCREASED MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA-RELATED PSYCHOSIS and SUICIDAL THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIORS WITH ANTIDEPRESSANT DRUGS See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Aripiprazole is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis. ( 5.1 ) Increased risk of suicidal thinking and behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults taking antidepressants. Monitor for worsening and emergence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. ( 5.3 )

FDA label effective July 31, 2026 — read the full label on DailyMed

What aripiprazole is FDA approved for, and the trials behind it

Approved for schizophrenia, and acute manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in 2002, under application NDA 021436. Source: FDA Drugs@FDA.

Efficacy in schizophrenia was evaluated in five short-term placebo-controlled trials, of 4 or 6 weeks, in acutely relapsed inpatients; four distinguished aripiprazole from placebo and the smallest did not. The four positive trials enrolled 414, 404, 420 and 367 patients, and three trials carried a risperidone or haloperidol arm that was not designed for a head-to-head comparison. A 26-week trial in 310 symptomatically stable patients measured time to relapse against placebo. For manic and mixed episodes, four positive 3-week placebo-controlled monotherapy trials enrolled 268, 248, 480 and 485 patients.

The FDA approved aripiprazole in 2002. There were two approved uses. One is schizophrenia. The other is sudden manic and mixed mood episodes in bipolar I disorder. The file number is NDA 021436. The source is Drugs@FDA, the FDA's own database.

For schizophrenia, the label reports five short trials against a placebo. They ran 4 or 6 weeks. Everyone in them had been admitted to hospital with symptoms that had flared up.

Four of the five told the drug apart from the placebo. The smallest one did not. The four that worked enrolled 414, 404, 420, and 367 people.

Three of them also had an arm on risperidone or haloperidol. Those arms were not built to compare the drugs head to head.

A 26-week trial in 310 people who were stable measured how long they went before symptoms came back. It ran against a placebo.

For manic and mixed episodes, four 3-week trials against a placebo worked. They enrolled 268, 248, 480, and 485 people. Each of those people took the drug on its own.

Trials
5 placebo-controlled trials
Duration
4 to 6 weeks
Participants
367 to 420 patients per positive trial
Compared against
Placebo; risperidone or haloperidol arms in three trials
The efficacy of aripiprazole in the treatment of schizophrenia was evaluated in five short-term (4-week and 6-week), placebo-controlled trials of acutely relapsed inpatients who predominantly met DSM-III/IV criteria for schizophrenia. Four of the five trials were able to distinguish aripiprazole from placebo, but one study, the smallest, did not.

Verbatim from the aripiprazole FDA label, Clinical Studies section, effective July 31, 2026 — read the full label on DailyMed.

Side effects of aripiprazole in the approval trials

Pooled incidence from the short-term placebo-controlled trials reported on the label — up to 6 weeks in schizophrenia and up to 3 weeks in bipolar mania — covering 1,843 adults on oral aripiprazole versus 1,166 on placebo. In the schizophrenia trials taken alone, the only reaction at 5% or more and at least twice the placebo rate was akathisia (8% vs 4%). The label cautions that trial rates cannot be directly compared to rates in trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.

Read the limits first. These numbers are pooled from the short trials the label reports. Those ran up to 6 weeks in schizophrenia. They ran up to 3 weeks in bipolar mania. 1,843 adults took the drug by mouth and 1,166 took a placebo.

Look at the schizophrenia trials on their own and only one problem hit 5 out of 100 or more at double the placebo rate. That was trouble sitting still (akathisia). It came up in 8 out of 100 people, against 4 on the placebo.

The label warns that you cannot line these rates up against another drug’s trials. It warns that real life may not match them either.

Akathisia on the aripiprazole label

The aripiprazole FDA label names akathisia in its Adverse Reactions section, in the list below.

  • Headache (27% vs 23% on placebo)
  • Agitation (19% vs 17%)
  • Insomnia (18% vs 13%)
  • Anxiety (17% vs 13%)
  • Nausea (15% vs 11%)
  • Constipation (11% vs 7%)
  • Vomiting (11% vs 6%)
  • Dizziness (10% vs 7%)
  • Akathisia (10% vs 4%)
  • Dyspepsia (9% vs 7%)
The most common adverse reactions in adult patients in clinical trials (≥10%) were nausea, vomiting, constipation, headache, dizziness, akathisia, anxiety, insomnia, and restlessness.

From the aripiprazole FDA label, Adverse Reactions section, effective July 31, 2026 — DailyMed.

More from the aripiprazole label: drug abuse and dependence

  • Not a controlled substance

    Aripiprazole is not a controlled substance. It has not been systematically studied in humans for its potential for abuse, tolerance or physical dependence, and the label advises evaluating patients for a history of drug abuse and watching such patients for signs of misuse.

    FDA label, Drug Abuse and Dependence section.

  • Dependence signals seen in animals only

    In physical dependence studies in monkeys, withdrawal symptoms were observed on abrupt cessation of dosing. Clinical trials showed no tendency toward drug-seeking behavior, though the label notes those observations were not systematic.

    FDA label, Drug Abuse and Dependence section.

How many Americans take aripiprazole

Survey-based federal estimates, published with a lag of about two years. They count prescriptions filled, not outcomes.

These are federal survey numbers. They come out about two years late. They count prescriptions filled. They do not tell you if the drug helped.

8,246,932
prescriptions in the United States (2024), refills included
1,780,154
people filling them (2024), ± 420,087 (95%)

From 2014 to 2024 the estimate moved up 27%, but that is within the survey’s margin of error, so we do not call it a rise or a fall. Whatever you decide about aripiprazole, you are deciding alongside about 1,780,154 other people in 2024.

Prescriptions by year: 2014 6,520,071 · 2015 5,410,932 · 2016 5,186,999 · 2017 6,695,764 · 2018 7,406,248 · 2019 6,625,791 · 2020 8,267,949 · 2021 6,805,675 · 2022 6,053,911 · 2023 7,197,548 · 2024 8,246,932.

Prescriptions are not clearly up or down since 2014. About 1.8 million people in the United States took it in 2024.

Correction (29 September 2026). An earlier version of this section took its numbers from ClinCalc DrugStats, a third-party site that republishes this survey; we now compute them from AHRQ’s public-use files ourselves. It said prescriptions were up 26% since 2014; that change is within the survey’s margin of error, so we no longer state a direction.

Source: AHRQ Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Prescribed Medicines public-use files, 2014 (HC-168A) through 2024 (HC-254A), computed by veisund. People with at least one purchase where the Multum generic name (RXDRGNAM) equals the drug, weighted by the year’s person weight; purchases include refills. Standard errors by Taylor linearization on VARSTR/VARPSU. AHRQ’s reliability rule: a year is not shown when fewer than 60 survey respondents reported the drug or the relative standard error is over 50%. AHRQ cautions that its 2018 questionnaire redesign and the 2020–2022 pandemic years make year-to-year comparisons less certain.

What people report to the FDA about aripiprazole

Read this before the numbers.

Anyone can file an adverse event report — patients, doctors, manufacturers — and nobody verifies that the drug caused what was reported. There is no denominator: tens of millions of prescriptions generate reports at an unknowable rate, and reporting rises with news coverage, not necessarily with harm. Counts below are report volumes, not rates, and cannot be compared between drugs. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical decisions — we show it because you deserve to see what is in the public record, with its limits stated plainly.

Read this before the numbers.

Anyone can send a report to the FDA. Patients can. Doctors can. Drug makers can. Nobody checks that the drug caused what the report describes.

There is also no bottom number. Tens of millions of prescriptions turn into reports at a rate nobody knows. Reports go up when a drug is in the news, and that is not the same as more harm.

So these are counts of reports. They are not rates. You cannot use them to compare one drug with another. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical choices.

We show it because it is on the public record, and you should get to see it with its limits named.

125,626
reports mentioning aripiprazole, all time
81,830
filed as serious (a report-level flag covering every drug and outcome in the report)
filed as serious. That flag covers the whole report, and one report can name more than one drug and more than one outcome.

Most-reported reactions

  • Off label use8,566
  • Drug ineffective8,544
  • Weight increased8,027
  • Product use in unapproved indication5,351
  • Anxiety5,268
  • Fatigue4,437
  • Suicidal ideation4,154
  • Depression4,147
  • Nausea4,127
  • Insomnia4,009

“Drug ineffective” ranking this high is worth noticing: a report of not being helped counts as an adverse event too, and people file them in large numbers.

It is worth noticing how high “drug ineffective” ranks. A report that the drug did not help counts as an adverse event too. People file a lot of them.

Source: FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), via openFDA, openFDA dataset refreshed 2026-07-30 (the refresh date of the query endpoint, not the date reports run through).

Drug interactions listed on the aripiprazole label

The FDA label’s interactions section, verbatim. A pharmacist checking your actual medication list beats any published list — including this one.

Below is the part of the FDA label that lists other drugs. It is copied word for word.

No list on the web can see what else you take. A pharmacist can. Ask one to check your full list.

Read the label’s interactions section

7 DRUG INTERACTIONS Dosage adjustment due to drug interactions ( 7.1 ): Factors Dosage Adjustments for Aripiprazole Known CYP2D6 Poor Metabolizers Administer half of usual dose Known CYP2D6 Poor Metabolizers and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors Administer a quarter of usual dose Strong CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 inhibitors Administer half of usual dose Strong CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 inhibitors Administer a quarter of usual dose Strong CYP3A4 inducers Double usual dose over 1 to 2 weeks

7.1 Drugs Having Clinically Important Interactions with Aripiprazole Table 22: Clinically Important Drug Interactions with Aripiprazole: Concomitant Drug Name or Drug Class Clinical Rationale Clinical Recommendation Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors (e.g., itraconazole, clarithromycin) or strong CYP2D6 inhibitors (e.g., quinidine, fluoxetine, paroxetine) Concomitant use of aripiprazole with strong CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 inhibitors increased the exposure of aripiprazole compared to the use of aripiprazole alone [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. Reduce the aripiprazole dosage when administered concomitantly with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor or a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor [see Dosage and Administration (2.6)]. Strong CYP3A4 Inducers (e.g., carbamazepine, rifampin) Concomitant use of aripiprazole and carbamazepine decreased the exposure of aripiprazole compared to the use of aripiprazole alone [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] . Increase the aripiprazole dosage when administered concomitantly with a strong CYP3A4 inducer [see Dosage and Administration (2.6)]. Antihypertensive Drugs Due to its alpha 1 - adrenergic antagonism, aripiprazole has the potential to enhance the effect of certain antihypertensive agents. Monitor blood pressure and adjust dose accordingly [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8)] . Benzodiazepines (e.g., lorazepam) The intensity of sedation was greater with the combination of oral aripiprazole and lorazepam as compared to that observed with aripiprazole alone. The orthostatic hypotension observed was greater with the combination as compared to that observed with lorazepam alone [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8)]. Monitor sedation and blood pressure. Adjust dose accordingly.

7.2 Drugs Having No Clinically Important Interactions with Aripiprazole Based on pharmacokinetic studies, no dosage adjustment of aripiprazole is required when administered concomitantly with famotidine, valproate, lithium, and lorazepam. In addition, no dosage adjustment is necessary for substrates of CYP2D6 (e.g., dextromethorphan, fluoxetine, paroxetine, or venlafaxine), CYP2C9 (e.g., warfarin), CYP2C19 (e.g., omeprazole, warfarin, escitalopram), or CYP3A4 (e.g., dextromethorphan) when coadministered with aripiprazole. Additionally, no dosage adjustment is necessary for valproate, lithium, lamotrigine, lorazepam, or sertraline when coadministered with aripiprazole [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

FDA label for aripiprazole, effective July 31, 2026 — DailyMed.

Label history: when this label changes, it is recorded in What changed.

Who pays for aripiprazole

Two claims datasets and one survey, covering different populations with different instruments — they cannot be reconciled by arithmetic, and where their sum crowds the all-payer estimate, that is a finding about the estimates rather than a percentage.

Medicare Part D · claims · 2024Medicaid · claims floor · 2024All-payer · survey · 2024Commercially insured adults · not publishedChildren · no per-drug data
Medicare Part D
Read the under-65 group correctly before the numbers: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population — among the sickest, highest-need people in the program — and reading their utilization as typical adult use would be a category error. The beneficiary total sums brand-level rows, so treat it as an upper bound on distinct people. 683,829 beneficiaries filled 4,109,192 claims in 2024 — 347,000 aged 65 and over, and 336,829 under 65.
Medicaid
At least 4,973,266 prescriptions in 2024 — a floor, because 303 of 1,651 national data rows are suppressed for privacy and contribute zero. Medicaid covers more children than any insurer in the country and publishes no age split — how much of this number is pediatric use is not knowable from public data.
All payers (survey estimate)
A survey estimate from 110 respondents, which we computed from AHRQ’s MEPS 2024 Prescribed Medicines file (people with at least one purchase, weighted; purchases include refills), puts the whole country at 8,246,932 purchases and 1,780,154 people in 2024. Subtracting the public programs from it would produce a number for everyone else — and we do not print that number, because subtracting a survey from claims counts manufactures precision that does not exist.
The population nobody counts
The commercially insured working-age adult — statistically, the likeliest person to be reading this page — is the one population with no public per-drug count anywhere. Private claims data exists and is sold, but nothing a patient can check is published. For children the record is thinner still: no public source counts pediatric use of aripiprazole specifically; the closest the public record comes is condition-level treatment rates for children, which we have traced for one condition in how childhood ADHD got counted.

Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers — by Geography and Drug, data.cms.gov, National rows, data year 2024 (published with ~17-month lag). Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data 2024, data.medicaid.gov, national aggregate rows. Retrieved 2026-09-01.

Who has been paying for aripiprazole, 2019–2024

Medicare Part D

Claims, all ages — the one payer with a public per-drug series.

20192024

3,361,484 → 4,109,192 claims

Medicare under 65

Beneficiaries, not ordinary working-age adults: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population. A gap is a suppressed split, not zero.

20192024

Not published for these years.

Medicaid

A floor each year — small-cell rows are suppressed federally and excluded from the sum.

20192024

3,810,410 → 4,973,266 prescriptions (floor)

Commercially insured adults

No public dataset publishes per-drug commercial claims for any year — the absence is the finding, and it is rendered, not interpolated. The population this library most wants to inform is the one with no public per-drug series, in any year — insurers and PBMs hold that data privately. What the federal surveys do measure — how many adults take these medications at all — is on the adult-usage page.

Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers by Geography and Drug (data.cms.gov, national rows, per data year); Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data (data.medicaid.gov, national rows). Claims, fills and beneficiaries are different units — compare each series only with itself.

The aripiprazole approval, step by step

  1. Step 1

    What the approval was actually based on

    Which studies did the FDA rely on, how long did they run, and who was in them?

    Efficacy of ABILIFY was established in the following adequate and well-controlled trials: Four short-term trials and one maintenance trial in adult patients... The efficacy of ABILIFY as monotherapy in the acute treatment of manic episodes was established in four 3-week, placebo-controlled trials in hospitalized patients who met the DSM-IV criteria for bipolar I disorder with manic or mixed episodes.

    FDA-approved labelling, 14 CLINICAL STUDIES — read the label on DailyMed

    Our reading

    The mania indication rests on four three-week trials in hospitalised patients. Read that against how the drug is actually used: for years, by outpatients, often as an add-on for depression. Three weeks in hospital and three years at home are not the same experiment.

  2. Step 2

    The approval

    When was it approved, under what application, and by whose review?

    Approved
    November 15, 2002
    Application
    NDA021436
    Review
    STANDARD
    Original sponsor
    Otsuka
    Holds it now
    Otsuka
    Label submissions since
    42

    Source: openFDA Drugs@FDA, original application ORIG-1

  3. Step 3

    What was added after it was on the market

    Which warnings arrived only after millions of people were already taking it?

  4. Step 4

    What independent research has found since

    What has been learned by people who were not selling it?

  5. Step 5

    What still is not known

    Which questions you might reasonably have has nobody answered yet?

    • Hospitalised patients under supervision for three weeks — what does that tell you about outpatient use over years?
    • Metabolic effects and tardive dyskinesia accumulate over time horizons far longer than any pivotal trial.
    • The dementia-mortality boxed warning applies to this class and came from post-market data, not from the approval package.

The aripiprazole legal and safety record

Settled and adjudicated matters only, from primary sources — including the litigation that was decided for the manufacturer, and the cases this drug is verifiably not part of.

Read the aripiprazole legal and safety record

Deciding about aripiprazole?

Open aripiprazole (Abilify) in veisund

The app has the full approval journey, the resources behind it, and people working through the same questions.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Browse the evidence library