Medication approval journey

atomoxetine (Strattera)

Approved for ADHD in pediatric patients 6 and older and adults

page first published · last updated

Also answers to “the scenic route” — its codename in our videos and posts. The full codebook

FDA approvedNon-stimulant ADHD medicationTaper risk: high

How this page reads

The page as written, with the clinical terms

Plain language uses the same facts, the same numbers and the same caveats. It does not leave anything out. Quotes from the FDA label are never reworded in either setting.

Before you stop or change your atomoxetine dose

Stopping abruptly can be dangerous — never do it without medical supervision

Clonidine and guanfacine must not be stopped abruptly — rebound high blood pressure is a real risk. Any change should be prescriber-supervised.

what the atomoxetine warnings mean

label facts below are read from the atomoxetine capsules FDA label on DailyMed, set id 6f6bea0c-297b-43ff-8960-ecc11243e06e, version 17, effective august 14, 2026, the version the dossier above cites. it is a generic of strattera (nda 021411) and carries strattera’s trial and side-effect tables. the brackets name the label section. every source is linked at the end of this section. last checked 2026-10-13.

atomoxetine was approved on november 26, 2002 under the brand strattera, and its label approves one thing: the treatment of adhd "in adults and pediatric patients 6 years of age and older" [label 1; approval]. it is not a stimulant. the label calls it a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, and it "is not a controlled substance"; in an abuse study in adults it "was not associated with stimulant or euphoriant properties", and after stopping there was "no evidence of symptom rebound" or a withdrawal syndrome, so the label says "no taper is needed" [label 1, 2.8, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3]. it carries one boxed warning, on suicidal thoughts and behaviors in children and adolescents. the federal survey this site uses for a scale line reports no usable count for atomoxetine in any year from 2014 to 2024: between 14 and 44 respondents reported it each year, under the 60 that ahrq’s reliability rule requires, so this page gives no all-payer number of people taking it [meps]. medicare part d records about 66,100 beneficiaries filling it in 2024, an upper bound on distinct people by the file’s own note, or about 1 in 820 of the 54,375,198 people with part d drug coverage; part d is mostly people 65 and over and people on disability, so it says nothing about how many children take it [partd]. this section says what the boxed warning means in plain words, what the other warnings ask for, what the approval trials measured, which side effects the label counts and how often, why a gene test appears on the label, and what independent research has found, in both directions. every number is from the label or a study in the library, and each source is linked at the end.

this is information to take to a prescriber. nothing here is a reason to start, stop or change a dose on your own. the two instructions the label gives patients and families directly, to watch children closely for suicidal thoughts and unusual changes in behavior and to report them, and to seek prompt medical attention for an erection lasting more than 4 hours, are the label’s, and they are quoted below.

the boxed warning, in plain words

the boxed warning reads, in full: "all atomoxetine-treated pediatric patients 6 years of age or older should be monitored and observed closely for suicidal thoughts and behavior, clinical worsening, or unusual changes in behavior, especially during the initial months of therapy or at times of dosage changes. families and caregivers should be advised of the need for close observation and communication with the health care provider. consider stopping atomoxetine in patients who experience emergent suicidal thoughts and behavior. atomoxetine increased the risk of suicidal ideation in pediatric patients aged 6 years of age and older with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (adhd) in short-term studies" [label boxed warning].

the number behind it is in section 5.1. across 12 pooled placebo-controlled studies of 6 to 18 weeks (11 in adhd, one in another condition) with over 2,200 children and adolescents, "the mean incidence of suicidal ideation in atomoxetine-treated pediatric patients was 0.4% (5/1,357) (including one patient with a suicide attempt) compared to 0% (0/851) in placebo-treated pediatric patients. no suicides occurred in these studies." the label adds three facts that shape what the warning means: "all the suicidal ideations occurred in pediatric patients 6 to 12 years of age, and all occurred during the first month", "it is unknown whether the risk of suicidal ideation in pediatric patients extends to longer-term use", and "a similar analysis in adult patients treated with atomoxetine for adhd did not reveal an increased risk of suicidal ideation or behavior" [label 5.1].

so in plain words: five children out of about 1,360 on the drug, none out of about 850 on placebo, all aged 6 to 12, all in the first month, none fatal. it is a small absolute number on a rare event, and with zero cases on placebo the label gives no ratio. what the label asks for is watching, not avoidance: families are to be "alerted about the need to monitor patients daily for the emergence of agitation, irritability, unusual changes in behavior, and mental health-related symptoms, as well as the emergence of suicidal thoughts and behavior, and to report such symptoms immediately", and the label lists anxiety, agitation, panic attacks, insomnia, irritability, hostility, aggressiveness, impulsivity, akathisia, hypomania and mania as symptoms reported with the drug that may be "precursors to emerging suicidality", while saying a causal link "has not been established" [label 5.1].

the other warnings, and what each one asks for

the rest of the label’s warnings, in its own order and words [label 5.2 to 5.11, 4]:

  • severe liver injury: "postmarketing reports indicate that atomoxetine can cause severe liver injury". no liver injury was detected in trials of about 6,000 patients, but rare cases followed approval, including liver failure and "a case that resulted in a liver transplant"; most began within 120 days of starting. one patient’s injury came back when the drug was restarted, "providing evidence that atomoxetine likely caused the liver injury". the instruction: test liver function "upon the first symptom or sign of liver dysfunction (e.g., pruritus, dark urine, jaundice, right upper quadrant tenderness, or unexplained 'flu like' symptoms)", and the drug "should be discontinued and not restarted in patients with jaundice or laboratory evidence of liver injury" [label 5.2].
  • serious heart problems: sudden death has been reported in children "with structural cardiac abnormalities or other serious heart problems", and sudden deaths, stroke and heart attack in adults, where "the role of atomoxetine" is "also unknown". the label asks for a careful history, including any family history of sudden death or ventricular arrhythmia, and a physical exam before starting, and says it "generally should not be used" in children with known serious structural heart problems, cardiomyopathy or serious arrhythmias [label 5.3].
  • blood pressure and heart rate: measure both "at baseline, following atomoxetine dosage increases, and periodically while on therapy". it is contraindicated in severe heart or vascular disorders that would worsen with a rise of about 15 to 20 mmhg or 20 beats a minute [label 4, 5.4]. the label’s table 7 gives how often the trials crossed those lines at any point: a heart rate rise of 20 beats a minute or more in 23% of children on the drug against 12% on placebo, and 22% of adults against 8%; a diastolic rise of 15 mmhg or more in 22% of children against 14% [label table 7]. fainting was reported in 0.8% of children across the programme (46 of 5,596) [label 5.4].
  • psychosis and mania: hallucinations, delusional thinking and mania "in patients without a prior history of psychotic illness or mania can be caused by atomoxetine at the recommended dosage". patients are to be screened for a personal or family history of bipolar disorder before starting, because they "may be at increased risk of developing mania or mixed episodes" [label 2.1, 5.5, 5.6].
  • aggression or hostility: "there is evidence that atomoxetine may cause the emergence or worsening of aggressive behavior or hostility" [label 5.7].
  • allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis and angioedema, "although uncommon" [label 5.8].
  • urine flow: in adult trials, urinary retention was 1.7% against 0% on placebo and urinary hesitation 5.6% against 0.5% [label 5.9].
  • priapism: "prompt medical attention is required in the event of suspected priapism", defined as an erection lasting more than 4 hours, reported rarely in children and adults [label 5.10].
  • growth: "closely monitor growth (e.g., weight, height) in pediatric patients". in short trials children on the drug lost an average 0.4 kg while those on placebo gained 1.5 kg; in long open-label studies weight and height lagged for the first 9 to 12 months, then weight rebounded, and at about 3 years height was 0.4 cm below prediction overall, and 1.2 cm below in children who started before puberty [label 5.11].
  • interactions: it is contraindicated with or within 14 days of an maoi, with narrow angle glaucoma, and with pheochromocytoma. paroxetine and fluoxetine, which block the liver enzyme cyp2d6, raised atomoxetine exposure 6 to 8 fold in people with a normal enzyme, and the label asks for a slower titration with any strong cyp2d6 inhibitor [label 4, 2.5, 7, 12.3].

why a gene test is on the label

atomoxetine is broken down mainly by cyp2d6, and the label says to "consider genetic testing to determine the patient’s cyp2d6 metabolizer status" [label 2.5]. people with two non-working copies of the gene, called poor metabolizers, clear the drug far more slowly: its half-life is 21.6 hours against 5.2, it builds up 3.3 fold rather than 1.1 fold, and clearance is about a tenth of normal (0.03 against 0.35 l/hr/kg) [label table 9].

that shows up in side effects. in children, poor metabolizers had more insomnia (11% against 6%), tremor (5% against 1%), depression (7% against 4%) and fainting (3% against 1%); their average heart rate rise was 9.4 beats a minute against 5; 11% of them stopped because of side effects against 6% of others; and after two years their weight gain was 2.4 kg below prediction against 0.2 kg [label 5.4, 5.11, 6.1, table 4]. in adults, poor metabolizers had more dry mouth (35% against 17%), erectile dysfunction (21% against 9%) and urinary retention (6% against 1%) [label table 6]. the label’s response is a longer titration interval, 4 weeks rather than 3 days, if symptoms have not improved and the starting dose is tolerated; the starting, target and maximum doses stay the same [label 2.5].

what the trials measured, in whom, and for how long

the label rests on four short pediatric trials, one long pediatric maintenance trial and two adult trials, all placebo-controlled [label 14]. in children the measure was the clinician-scored adhd rating scale, parent version; in adults it was the clinician-rated conners adult adhd rating scale [label 14.1, 14.2].

the pediatric trials ran 6 to 9 weeks: 297 children aged 8 to 18 on fixed doses for 8 weeks, 171 aged 6 to 16 on one morning dose for 6 weeks, and two 9-week trials of 147 and 144 children aged 7 to 13 that also had a methylphenidate arm [label 14.1]. the drug beat placebo in all four. the fixed-dose trial adds two facts most summaries leave out: the lowest dose, 0.25 mg/kg twice a day, "was not superior to the placebo group", and the highest, 0.9 mg/kg twice a day, "did not provide any additional benefit" over 0.6 mg/kg; the dosing section says "no additional benefit has been demonstrated" above 1.2 mg/kg a day [label 2.3, 14.1]. the two adult trials ran 10 weeks in 280 and 256 adults at a mean of about 48 mg twice a day, and both beat placebo [label 14.2].

the maintenance trial took children aged 6 to 15 who responded during 10 weeks of open-label treatment and randomised 292 to stay on the drug and 124 to placebo; those who stayed well for about 8 months were randomised again, 81 and 82. in both phases those on the drug "experienced significantly longer times to relapse" [label 14.1]. this generic label prints the efficacy results as statements of statistical significance only: it gives no point differences or effect sizes for any of the seven trials, so this page cannot give one from the label. the size of the effect comes from the meta-analysis in the research block.

two safety trials matter for families weighing it against a stimulant: in 148 children with adhd and tourette syndrome or chronic tics, it "did not worsen tics" over 18 weeks, though 70% left the trial, mostly for lack of effect on adhd; and in children and adults with adhd and anxiety disorders it did not worsen anxiety [label 14.3].

side effects, with the label’s numbers

in the short pediatric trials, 1,597 children on the drug against 934 on placebo: headache 19% against 15%, abdominal pain 18% against 10%, decreased appetite 16% against 4%, somnolence 11% against 4%, vomiting 11% against 6%, nausea 10% against 5%, fatigue 8% against 3%, irritability 6% against 3%, dizziness 5% against 2%, and weight loss 3% against 0% [label table 2]. 3% of children stopped because of a side effect against 1.4% on placebo [label 6.1]. in the fixed-dose trial, 29.1% of children at the top dose lost at least 3.5% of their body weight, against 1.3% on placebo [label 5.11].

adults report a different pattern. in 1,697 adults on the drug against 1,560 on placebo: nausea 26% against 6%, dry mouth 20% against 5%, decreased appetite 16% against 3%, insomnia 15% against 8%, fatigue 10% against 6%, erectile dysfunction 8% against 1% (of men), constipation 8% against 3%, dizziness 8% against 3%, urinary hesitation 6% against 1%, and delayed ejaculation 4% against 1% [label table 5]. 11.3% of adults stopped because of a side effect against 3% on placebo [label 6.1]. the label says sexual side effects are "likely to underestimate their actual incidence" because patients and clinicians may not raise them, and asks prescribers to "routinely inquire about sexual dysfunction" [label 6.1].

after approval, reports added qt prolongation, raynaud’s phenomenon, seizures (including in people with no history or risk factors), tics, depression and anxiety [label 6.2]. no death has been reported from an overdose of atomoxetine alone, including intentional overdoses up to 1,400 mg; deaths have been reported in mixed overdoses with other drugs [label 10].

what the research says, in both directions

a limit to state first: this site’s library holds no row tagged atomoxetine yet. the research below is the label’s own trials and the cross-drug studies in the library that include it, and the library rows those studies sit on are written up for other adhd drugs.

in favour. the largest network meta-analysis of adhd medicines, 133 double-blind trials, found that on clinician ratings at about 12 weeks atomoxetine beat placebo in children and adolescents (standardised mean difference -0.56, 95% ci -0.66 to -0.45) and in adults (-0.45, -0.58 to -0.32) [cortese-2018]. it is the one adhd drug in a 2024 pharmacovigilance study of people aged 13 to 25 for which no association with reports of psychosis was found, where amphetamines were reported for psychosis more often than methylphenidate; that study counts reports, not rates [hamard-2024]. its label shows no abuse potential and no withdrawal syndrome, and trials found it did not worsen tics or anxiety [label 9.2, 9.3, 14.3].

against, or smaller than it sounds. in the same meta-analysis the effect in children was smaller than for amphetamines (-1.02) or methylphenidate (-0.78), head-to-head comparisons favoured amphetamines over atomoxetine in both age groups, teacher ratings showed a benefit over placebo only for methylphenidate and modafinil among the comparisons available, and adults were more likely to stop atomoxetine because of side effects than placebo (odds ratio 2.33, 95% ci 1.28 to 4.25); the authors recommended methylphenidate first for children and amphetamines first for adults, and found too little data to judge any drug at 26 or 52 weeks [cortese-2018]. a swedish study of 278,027 people with adhd linked each added year of adhd medicine use to a 4% higher risk of cardiovascular disease, mostly high blood pressure and arterial disease; that is a class finding across adhd medicines, written up in the library for methylphenidate, not a result for atomoxetine alone [zhang-2024]. the label’s own pediatric trials were 6 to 9 weeks long, and it reports no trial in people over 65 [label 8.5, 14].

for contrast, the stimulants carry a boxed warning on abuse, misuse and addiction that the fda updated across the class in 2023 [stimulant-warning]; atomoxetine’s boxed warning is a different one, about suicidal thoughts in children, and guanfacine, the other common non-stimulant, carries none [guanfacine-explainer; compare-guanfacine]. the side-by-side pages set the labels next to each other [compare-guanfacine; compare-methylphenidate].

questions to ask your prescriber about atomoxetine

each one comes from a warning or a study above. they are questions, not instructions; the answers depend on a history nobody here has.

  • the boxed warning asks families to watch a child daily for agitation, irritability, unusual changes in behavior and suicidal thoughts, especially in the first month and after dose changes. what should we watch for, and who do we call?
  • is there anything in my or my family’s history, such as bipolar disorder, mania or depression, that the label says should be screened for before starting?
  • the label asks for heart rate and blood pressure before starting, after each dose increase and periodically. when will those be checked, and what numbers would change the plan?
  • the label lists the first signs of liver injury as itching, dark urine, yellowing skin, pain under the right ribs or unexplained flu-like symptoms. if any appear, what should happen next?
  • the label suggests considering a cyp2d6 gene test, and poor metabolizers had more side effects. would a test change anything for me, and am i taking anything, such as fluoxetine or paroxetine, that blocks the same enzyme?
  • the label gives no time to effect, and its trials measured results at 6 to 10 weeks. how long should we give it before deciding whether it is working, and how will we measure that?
  • for a child, how will growth be tracked, given the label’s figures on weight in the first year?

questions people ask

does atomoxetine (strattera) have a black box warning?
yes, one: suicidal thoughts and behaviors in children and adolescents aged 6 and over. in 12 pooled short trials, suicidal ideation was reported in 0.4% of children on atomoxetine (5 of 1,357, including one suicide attempt) against 0% on placebo (0 of 851), with no suicides; all cases were in 6 to 12 year olds and in the first month. a similar analysis in adults found no increased risk. the label asks for close observation, especially early and after dose changes.
how long does atomoxetine take to work?
the label does not give a time to effect. its pediatric trials measured results after 6 to 9 weeks and its adult trials after 10 weeks. the dose is raised after a minimum of 3 days to the target, and in adults the label allows a move to the maximum only if response is not optimal after a further 2 to 4 weeks. in cyp2d6 poor metabolizers or with a strong cyp2d6 inhibitor, it recommends a 4-week titration interval. how long to wait before judging it is a question for the prescriber.
can atomoxetine cause liver damage?
rarely. no liver injury was seen in trials of about 6,000 patients, but after approval the label records rare cases of severe liver injury, including liver failure and one liver transplant, mostly within 120 days of starting. one case recurred on restarting, which the label calls evidence that atomoxetine likely caused it. the label asks for liver tests at the first sign, such as itching, dark urine, jaundice or unexplained flu-like symptoms, and says the drug should not be restarted after jaundice or lab evidence of liver injury.
is atomoxetine a stimulant or a controlled substance?
no to both. the label calls it a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, says it is not a controlled substance, and reports that in an adult abuse study it had no stimulant or euphoriant properties. after stopping, trials found no rebound or withdrawal syndrome, and the label says no taper is needed. its warnings are about suicidal thoughts in children, the liver, the heart and blood pressure rather than misuse.
what are the most common atomoxetine side effects?
in children: headache, abdominal pain (18% against 10% on placebo), decreased appetite (16% against 4%), sleepiness (11% against 4%), vomiting, nausea, fatigue and irritability. in adults: nausea (26% against 6%), dry mouth (20% against 5%), decreased appetite, insomnia, constipation, dizziness, erectile dysfunction (8% against 1% of men) and urinary hesitation. people who are cyp2d6 poor metabolizers had several of these more often.
how does atomoxetine compare with stimulants for adhd?
a 2018 network meta-analysis of 133 trials found atomoxetine better than placebo on clinician ratings in children and adults, but with a smaller effect than amphetamines or methylphenidate in children, and head-to-head comparisons favoured amphetamines. adults were more likely to stop it than placebo because of side effects. it is not a controlled substance and its label shows no abuse potential, while the stimulant labels carry a class boxed warning on abuse, misuse and addiction.

sources for this section

the library rows link to our one-page summary of each study, with the original paper, its funding and our evidence grade on that page.

  1. atomoxetine capsules prescribing information, fda label on dailymed (set id 6f6bea0c-297b-43ff-8960-ecc11243e06e, version 17, effective august 14, 2026; a generic of strattera): boxed warning, sections 1, 2.1 to 2.8, 4, 5.1 to 5.11, 6.1, 6.2, 7, 8.5, 9.1 to 9.3, 10, 12.3, 14.1 to 14.3 and tables 2 to 9
  2. drugs@fda, nda 021411 (strattera, atomoxetine), approved november 26, 2002
  3. ahrq medical expenditure panel survey, prescribed medicines public-use files 2014 (hc-168a) to 2024 (hc-254a): people with at least one atomoxetine purchase, weighted; no reportable year, with 14 to 44 respondents a year against ahrq’s minimum of 60; computed by veisund, method on the usage section of this page
  4. cms medicare part d prescribers by geography and drug, national rows, data year 2024: 66,109 beneficiaries across brand and generic rows, summed, an upper bound on distinct people; denominator cms medicare monthly enrollment 2024, 54,375,198 beneficiaries with drug coverage
  5. cortese s, et al. comparative efficacy and tolerability of medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents, and adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. lancet psychiatry 2018 (the library row is written up for methylphenidate; the atomoxetine findings were read from the pubmed abstract, pmid 30097390, on 2026-10-13) (library row)
  6. hamard j, rousseau v, durrieu g, et al. psychosis with use of amphetamine drugs, methylphenidate and atomoxetine in adolescent and adults. bmj mental health 2024 (a who vigibase pharmacovigilance study of reports, not rates; the library row is written up for lisdexamfetamine; the atomoxetine finding was read from the abstract via crossref, doi 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300876, on 2026-10-13) (library row)
  7. zhang l, et al. attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications and long-term risk of cardiovascular diseases. jama psychiatry 2024 (a class finding across adhd medicines; the library row is written up for methylphenidate) (library row)
  8. fda drug safety communication, 2023: fda updating warnings to improve safe use of prescription stimulants used to treat adhd and other conditions (stimulants only; cited here for contrast) (library row)
  9. what the guanfacine (intuniv) warnings mean, the companion explainer on this site for the other common non-stimulant
  10. atomoxetine vs guanfacine, this site’s side-by-side comparison of the two non-stimulant adhd labels
  11. atomoxetine vs methylphenidate, this site’s side-by-side comparison
we went and looked

every check quotes one sentence, links the original at the timestamp, and takes each assertion to the primary record. the full list: /checked.

How long the atomoxetine trials actually ran

We could not establish a longest trial length for atomoxetine. That is a gap in what we can show you — not evidence that the trials ran long.

The label carries a clinical studies section describing the trials the approval rested on.

The gap between how long the trials ran and how long people actually take these medications is the single most important thing on this page. It is not evidence that longer use is unsafe or ineffective. It is evidence that longer use was not what got tested.

People often stay on these drugs for far longer than the trials ran. The trials behind the approval ran 6 to 10 weeks.

That does not mean longer use is unsafe. It does not mean the drug stops working either. It means longer use was never the thing that got tested.

If you have been on it a long time, that is a fair thing to ask your prescriber about.

Boxed warning: suicidal thoughts and behaviors

The strongest warning the FDA puts on a label, often called a black box warning. It is reproduced below word for word, not summarised.

This is the strongest warning the FDA can put on a drug label. Some people call it a black box warning. We copied it word for word. We did not shorten it and we did not soften it.

The warning below is about suicidal thoughts in young patients. The label says every patient aged 6 and older on this drug should be watched closely. Watch for suicidal thoughts and behavior. Watch for the illness getting worse. Watch for odd changes in behavior. The label says to watch most closely in the first months and when the dose changes. It says to think about stopping the drug if suicidal thoughts or behavior show up.

The FDA’s own words follow, copied exactly.

WARNING: SUICIDAL THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIORS IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS 6 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER All atomoxetine-treated pediatric patients 6 years of age or older should be monitored and observed closely for suicidal thoughts and behavior, clinical worsening, or unusual changes in behavior, especially during the initial months of therapy or at times of dosage changes. Families and caregivers should be advised of the need for close observation and communication with the health care provider. Consider stopping atomoxetine in patients who experience emergent suicidal thoughts and behavior [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ]. Atomoxetine increased the risk of suicidal ideation in pediatric patients aged 6 years of age and older with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in short-term studies. WARNING: SUICIDAL THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIORS IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS 6 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. All atomoxetine-treated pediatric patients 6 years of age or older should be monitored and observed closely for suicidal thoughts and behavior, clinical worsening, or unusual changes in behavior, especially during the initial months of therapy or at times of dosage changes ( 5.1 ) Consider stopping atomoxetine in patients who experience emergent suicidal thoughts and behavior ( 5.1 ) Atomoxetine increased the risk of suicidal ideation in pediatric patients aged 6 years of age and older with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in short-term studies ( 5.1 )

FDA label effective August 14, 2026 — read the full label on DailyMed

What atomoxetine is FDA approved for, and the trials behind it

Approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults and pediatric patients 6 years of age and older in 2002, under application NDA 021411. Source: FDA Drugs@FDA.

Effectiveness in pediatric patients was established in four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of 297, 171, 147, and 144 patients aged 6 to 18, lasting 6 to 9 weeks; two of these also included a methylphenidate arm. In adults, two 10-week placebo-controlled studies of 280 and 256 patients showed significant improvement on the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale. A randomized-withdrawal study supported maintenance treatment in pediatric patients.

The FDA approved atomoxetine in 2002. The approved use was attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It covers adults and children aged 6 and older. The file number is NDA 021411. The source is Drugs@FDA, the FDA's own database.

In children and teens, four trials against a placebo backed the approval. People were sorted by chance. Nobody knew who got the drug (randomized, double-blind).

Those four enrolled 297, 171, 147, and 144 patients aged 6 to 18. They ran 6 to 9 weeks. Two of them also had a methylphenidate arm.

In adults, two 10-week trials against a placebo backed it. They held 280 and 256 patients. Both showed real gains on an adult ADHD rating scale.

One more study took people who were doing well and moved some to a placebo. It supported staying on the drug in children and teens.

Trials
6 placebo-controlled trials
Duration
6 to 10 weeks
Participants
1,613 pediatric patients and 541 adults received atomoxetine in acute placebo-controlled studies
Compared against
Placebo; methylphenidate in two pediatric studies
The effectiveness of atomoxetine in the treatment of ADHD was established in four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of pediatric patients 6 to 18 years of age (Studies 1, 2, 3, and 4).

Verbatim from the atomoxetine FDA label, Clinical Studies section, effective August 14, 2026 — read the full label on DailyMed.

Side effects of atomoxetine in the approval trials

Pediatric incidence among 1,597 patients on atomoxetine versus 934 on placebo in acute studies of up to 18 weeks, for reactions reported by 2% or more of treated patients and more often than on placebo. In adults, the most common reactions were constipation, dry mouth, nausea, decreased appetite, dizziness, erectile dysfunction, and urinary hesitation. The label cautions that trial rates cannot be directly compared with trials of other drugs and may not reflect rates observed in practice.

Read the limits first. The numbers for children and teens come from short studies of up to 18 weeks. 1,597 patients took the drug and 934 took a placebo.

The list holds problems reported by 2 or more out of every 100 patients on the drug. It holds them only where they came up more often than on the placebo.

In adults, the most common problems were different. They were constipation, dry mouth, feeling sick, less appetite, dizziness, trouble getting an erection, and trouble starting to pass urine.

The label warns that you cannot line these rates up against another drug’s trials. It warns that real life may not match them either.

  • Headache (19% vs 15% on placebo)
  • Abdominal pain (18% vs 10%)
  • Decreased appetite (16% vs 4%)
  • Somnolence (11% vs 4%)
  • Vomiting (11% vs 6%)
  • Nausea (10% vs 5%)
  • Fatigue (8% vs 3%)
  • Irritability (6% vs 3%)
  • Dizziness (5% vs 2%)
  • Decreased weight (3% vs 0%)
The most commonly observed adverse reactions in atomoxetine-treated patients (incidence of ≥5% and ≥ twice the incidence in placebo-treated patients), for either twice daily or once daily dosing were: nausea, vomiting, fatigue, decreased appetite, abdominal pain, and somnolence

From the atomoxetine FDA label, Adverse Reactions section, effective August 14, 2026 — DailyMed.

More from the atomoxetine label: drug abuse and dependence

  • Not a controlled substance

    Atomoxetine is not a controlled substance. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled abuse-potential study in adults, it was not associated with stimulant or euphoriant properties, and clinical data in over 2,000 adults and pediatric patients with ADHD showed only isolated incidents of inappropriate self-administration.

    FDA label, Drug Abuse and Dependence section.

  • No withdrawal syndrome reported

    After atomoxetine discontinuation, there was no evidence of symptom rebound or adverse reactions suggesting a discontinuation or withdrawal syndrome.

    FDA label, Drug Abuse and Dependence section.

How many Americans take atomoxetine

Survey-based federal estimates, published with a lag of about two years. They count prescriptions filled, not outcomes.

These are federal survey numbers. They come out about two years late. They count prescriptions filled. They do not tell you if the drug helped.

No year from 2014 to 2024 meets AHRQ’s reliability rule for this drug, so we print no count. Years not shown, under AHRQ’s reliability rule: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 (fewer than 60 survey respondents).

Correction (29 September 2026). An earlier version of this section took its numbers from ClinCalc DrugStats, a third-party site that republishes this survey; we now compute them from AHRQ’s public-use files ourselves. It showed 948,465 people and 4,208,253 prescriptions for 2024. No year meets AHRQ’s reliability rule for this drug, so that count is removed. It said prescriptions were up 64% since 2014; too few years meet the rule to show a trend, so that line is removed.

Source: AHRQ Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Prescribed Medicines public-use files, 2014 (HC-168A) through 2024 (HC-254A), computed by veisund. People with at least one purchase where the Multum generic name (RXDRGNAM) equals the drug, weighted by the year’s person weight; purchases include refills. Standard errors by Taylor linearization on VARSTR/VARPSU. AHRQ’s reliability rule: a year is not shown when fewer than 60 survey respondents reported the drug or the relative standard error is over 50%. AHRQ cautions that its 2018 questionnaire redesign and the 2020–2022 pandemic years make year-to-year comparisons less certain.

What people report to the FDA about atomoxetine

Read this before the numbers.

Anyone can file an adverse event report — patients, doctors, manufacturers — and nobody verifies that the drug caused what was reported. There is no denominator: tens of millions of prescriptions generate reports at an unknowable rate, and reporting rises with news coverage, not necessarily with harm. Counts below are report volumes, not rates, and cannot be compared between drugs. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical decisions — we show it because you deserve to see what is in the public record, with its limits stated plainly.

Read this before the numbers.

Anyone can send a report to the FDA. Patients can. Doctors can. Drug makers can. Nobody checks that the drug caused what the report describes.

There is also no bottom number. Tens of millions of prescriptions turn into reports at a rate nobody knows. Reports go up when a drug is in the news, and that is not the same as more harm.

So these are counts of reports. They are not rates. You cannot use them to compare one drug with another. The FDA itself says not to use this data to make medical choices.

We show it because it is on the public record, and you should get to see it with its limits named.

26,970
reports mentioning atomoxetine, all time
11,821
filed as serious (a report-level flag covering every drug and outcome in the report)
filed as serious. That flag covers the whole report, and one report can name more than one drug and more than one outcome.

Most-reported reactions

  • Drug ineffective2,955
  • Nausea2,251
  • Fatigue2,246
  • Headache1,843
  • Vomiting1,815
  • Off label use1,799
  • Dizziness1,708
  • Insomnia1,618
  • Depression1,478
  • Somnolence1,461

“Drug ineffective” ranking this high is worth noticing: a report of not being helped counts as an adverse event too, and people file them in large numbers.

It is worth noticing how high “drug ineffective” ranks. A report that the drug did not help counts as an adverse event too. People file a lot of them.

Source: FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), via openFDA, openFDA dataset refreshed 2026-07-30 (the refresh date of the query endpoint, not the date reports run through).

Drug interactions listed on the atomoxetine label

The FDA label’s interactions section, verbatim. A pharmacist checking your actual medication list beats any published list — including this one.

Below is the part of the FDA label that lists other drugs. It is copied word for word.

No list on the web can see what else you take. A pharmacist can. Ask one to check your full list.

Read the label’s interactions section

7 DRUG INTERACTIONS See Table 8 for clinically significant drug interactions with atomoxetine and other drugs. Table 8: Clinically Significant Drug Interactions with Atomoxetine Capsules and Other Drugs Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs) Prevention or Management Atomoxetine is contraindicated in patients taking MAOIs, including MAOIs such as linezolid or intravenous methylene blue, or in patients who stopped an MAOI within 14 days. Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) As with other drugs affecting brain monoamine concentrations, there have been reports of serious, sometimes fatal reactions (hyperthermia, rigidity, myoclonus, autonomic instability with fluctuations of vital signs, extreme agitation progressing to delirium/coma) with concomitant use of atomoxetine and an MAOI. Some cases presented with features resembling neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Strong CYP2D6 Inhibitors Prevention or Management With concomitant use of atomoxetine and a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor, increase the titration interval [see Dosage and Administration (2.5) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Atomoxetine is a CYP2D6 substrate. The concomitant use of atomoxetine and a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor increases atomoxetine exposure [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . Antihypertensive Drugs Prevention or Management Increase the frequency of monitoring blood pressure and adjust atomoxetine dosage as clinically appropriate. Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Because of increased risk of increased blood pressure, atomoxetine should be used cautiously with antihypertensive drugs, other drugs that increase blood pressure or pressor drugs (e.g., dopamine, dobutamine). Albuterol or Other Beta2 Agonists Prevention or Management Increase the frequency of monitoring blood pressure and heart rate and adjust atomoxetine dosage as clinically appropriate. Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Systemically administered albuterol (e.g., oral) can be potentiated by atomoxetine, resulting in increases in heart rate and blood pressure. [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors: Concomitant use contraindicated. ( 4 , 7 ) Strong CYP2D6 Inhibitors: With concomitant use of atomoxetine and strong CYP2D6 inhibitors, increase the titration intervals. ( 7 ) Antihypertensives: Increase the frequency of monitoring blood pressure and adjust atomoxetine dosage as clinically appropriate. ( 7 ) Albuterol (or other beta2 agonists): Increase the frequency of monitoring blood pressure and heart rate. ( 7 )

FDA label for atomoxetine, effective August 14, 2026 — DailyMed.

Label history: when this label changes, it is recorded in What changed.

Who pays for atomoxetine

Two claims datasets and one survey, covering different populations with different instruments — they cannot be reconciled by arithmetic, and where their sum crowds the all-payer estimate, that is a finding about the estimates rather than a percentage.

Medicare Part D · claims · 2024Medicaid · claims floor · 2024Commercially insured adults · not publishedChildren · no per-drug data
Medicare Part D
Read the under-65 group correctly before the numbers: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population — among the sickest, highest-need people in the program — and reading their utilization as typical adult use would be a category error. The beneficiary total sums brand-level rows, so treat it as an upper bound on distinct people. 66,109 beneficiaries filled 327,343 claims in 2024 — 24,096 aged 65 and over, and 42,013 under 65.
Medicaid
At least 1,651,014 prescriptions in 2024 — a floor, because 66 of 553 national data rows are suppressed for privacy and contribute zero. Medicaid covers more children than any insurer in the country and publishes no age split — how much of this number is pediatric use is not knowable from public data.
All payers (survey estimate)
No figure. In AHRQ’s MEPS 2024 Prescribed Medicines file, only 44 survey respondents reported it, under the 60 AHRQ requires before it publishes an estimate, so we do not print one.
The population nobody counts
The commercially insured working-age adult — statistically, the likeliest person to be reading this page — is the one population with no public per-drug count anywhere. Private claims data exists and is sold, but nothing a patient can check is published. For children the record is thinner still: no public source counts pediatric use of atomoxetine specifically; the closest the public record comes is condition-level treatment rates for children, which we have traced for one condition in how childhood ADHD got counted.

Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers — by Geography and Drug, data.cms.gov, National rows, data year 2024 (published with ~17-month lag). Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data 2024, data.medicaid.gov, national aggregate rows. Retrieved 2026-09-01.

Who has been paying for atomoxetine, 2019–2024

Medicare Part D

Claims, all ages — the one payer with a public per-drug series.

20192024

183,732 → 327,343 claims

Medicare under 65

Beneficiaries, not ordinary working-age adults: Medicare before 65 means the disabled and dual-eligible population. A gap is a suppressed split, not zero.

20192024

25,643 → 42,013 beneficiaries

Medicaid

A floor each year — small-cell rows are suppressed federally and excluded from the sum.

20192024

1,104,549 → 1,651,014 prescriptions (floor)

Commercially insured adults

No public dataset publishes per-drug commercial claims for any year — the absence is the finding, and it is rendered, not interpolated. The population this library most wants to inform is the one with no public per-drug series, in any year — insurers and PBMs hold that data privately. What the federal surveys do measure — how many adults take these medications at all — is on the adult-usage page.

Sources: Medicare Part D Prescribers by Geography and Drug (data.cms.gov, national rows, per data year); Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data (data.medicaid.gov, national rows). Claims, fills and beneficiaries are different units — compare each series only with itself.

The atomoxetine approval, step by step

  1. Step 1

    What the approval was actually based on

    Which studies did the FDA rely on, how long did they run, and who was in them?

    The effectiveness of STRATTERA in the treatment of ADHD was established in four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of pediatric patients 6 to 18 years of age (Studies 1, 2, 3, and 4). In these studies, approximately one-third of the patients met DSM-IV criteria for inattentive subtype and two-thirds met criteria for both inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive subtypes...

    FDA-approved labelling, 14 CLINICAL STUDIES — read the label on DailyMed

    Our reading

    The first non-stimulant approved for ADHD, and marketed hard on exactly that distinction. The acute pediatric trials ran six to nine weeks, adult trials about ten, with a longer maintenance study following. Two label facts arrived after approval and deserve to be read together with it: a boxed warning about suicidal ideation in children and adolescents was added in 2005, three years in — and the brand itself was later discontinued, so every Strattera prescription filled today is a generic riding on this application's evidence.

  2. Step 2

    The approval

    When was it approved, under what application, and by whose review?

    Approved
    November 26, 2002
    Application
    NDA021411
    Review
    STANDARD
    Original sponsor
    Eli Lilly and Company
    Holds it now
    Eli Lilly and Company
    Label submissions since
    37

    Source: openFDA Drugs@FDA, original application ORIG-1

  3. Step 3

    What was added after it was on the market

    Which warnings arrived only after millions of people were already taking it?

    We have not recorded a post-approval change to the atomoxetine label. That is the state of our record, not a finding that nothing was ever added.

  4. Step 4

    What independent research has found since

    What has been learned by people who were not selling it?

    We have not yet added independent post-approval research on atomoxetine to the evidence library. Absence here means we have not covered it, not that none exists.

  5. Step 5

    What still is not known

    Which questions you might reasonably have has nobody answered yet?

    • The suicidal-ideation boxed warning arrived in 2005, three years after approval. What did the pivotal trials measure that missed it?
    • Non-stimulant is a safety claim as much as a mechanism. Compared head-to-head with stimulants on outcomes, what is known?
    • Acute trials of six to ten weeks, for a condition treated for years — the standard question, no better answered here.

Deciding about atomoxetine?

Open atomoxetine (Strattera) in veisund

The app has the full approval journey, the resources behind it, and people working through the same questions.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Browse the evidence library